skip to main content
10.1145/3428361.3428405acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

StickyWSD: Investigating Content Positioning on a Windshield Display for Automated Driving

Published: 22 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Windshield displays (WSDs) are a promising new technology to augment the entire windscreen with additional information about vehicle state, highlight critical objects in the surrounding, or use the screen as replacement for a conventional display. Typically, augmentation is provided in a screen-fixed manner as overlay on the windscreen. However, it is unclear to date if this is optimal in terms of usability/UX and further there is no golden standard suggesting where to place and how to manage content on such large displays in a vehicular environment. In this work, we propose ”StickyWSD” – a world-fixed positioning strategy – and evaluate its impact on quantitative and qualitative measures compared to screen-fixed positioning. Results from a user study conducted in a virtual reality driving simulator (N = 23) suggest that the dynamic world-fixed positioning technique shows increased task performance and lowered error rates as well as faster take-over times. Subjective evaluations show no clear preferences between both conditions. We propose to display text content on the WSD in world-fixed modality but further studies on context- and content-awareness are required.

References

[1]
Lotfi Abdi, Faten Ben Abdallah, and Aref Meddeb. 2015. In-Vehicle Augmented Reality Traffic Information System: A New Type of Communication Between Driver and Vehicle. Procedia Computer Science 73 (2015), 242 – 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.024 International Conference on Advanced Wireless Information and Communication Technologies (AWICT 2015).
[2]
Christiane Attig, Sebastian Mach, Daniel Wessel, Thomas Franke, Franziska Schmalfuß, and Josef Krems. 2018. Technikaffinität als Ressource für die Arbeit in Industrie 4.0. https://doi.org/10.14464/aw&i%20conference.v3i0.251
[3]
Karlin Bark, Cuong Tran, Kikuo Fujimura, and Victor Ng-Thow-Hing. 2014. Personal Navi: Benefits of an Augmented Reality Navigational Aid Using a See-Thru 3D Volumetric HUD. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(AutomotiveUI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667329
[4]
Louise Barkhuus and Jennifer A. Rode. 2007. From Mice to Men - 24 Years of Evaluation in CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.2180963
[5]
Pavlo Bazilinskyy, Sebastiaan M Petermeijer, Veronika Petrovych, Dimitra Dodou, and Joost CF de Winter. 2018. Take-over requests in highly automated driving: A crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 56 (2018), 82–98.
[6]
BMW. [n.d.]. BMW Head Up Display: How It Works and What Information Can You See. https://www.bmwux.com/bmw-performance-technology/bmw-technology/bmw-head-up-display-explained/. Accessed: 2019-07-19.
[7]
Harry N Boone and Deborah A Boone. 2012. Analyzing likert data. Journal of extension 50, 2 (2012), 1–5.
[8]
Gary Burnett and R.A. Donkor. 2012. Evaluating the impact of head-up display complexity on peripheral detection performance: A driving simulator study. Advances in Transportation Studies (01 2012), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.4399/97888548555261
[9]
SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee. 2018. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems.
[10]
Meredyth Daneman and Patricia A. Carpenter. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19, 4 (1980), 450 – 466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
[11]
Swaroop Darbha and J K. Hedrick. 1999. Constant Spacing Strategies for Platooning in Automated Highway Systems. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-transactions of The Asme - J DYN SYST MEAS CONTR 121 (09 1999). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2802497
[12]
Fred D. Davis. 1993. User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 38, 3 (March 1993), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
[13]
Joost CF De Winter, Riender Happee, Marieke H Martens, and Neville A Stanton. 2014. Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 27 (2014), 196–217.
[14]
Cyriel Diels and Jelte E Bos. 2016. Self-driving carsickness. Applied ergonomics 53(2016), 374–382.
[15]
Ebru Dogan, Mohamed-Cherif Rahal, Renaud Deborne, Patricia Delhomme, Andras Kemeny, and Jérôme Perrin. 2017. Transition of control in a partially automated vehicle: Effects of anticipation and non-driving-related task involvement. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 46 (2017), 205–215.
[16]
Joseph L Gabbard, Gregory M Fitch, and Hyungil Kim. 2014. Behind the Glass: Driver Challenges and Opportunities for AR Automotive Applications. Proc. IEEE 102, 2 (2014), 124–136.
[17]
Renate Haeuslschmid, Yixin Shou, John O’Donovan, Gary Burnett, and Andreas Butz. 2016. First Steps towards a View Management Concept for Large-sized Head-up Displays with Continuous Depth. In the 8th International Conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–8.
[18]
Renate Häuslschmid, Sven Osterwald, Marcus Lang, and Andreas Butz. 2015. Augmenting the Driver’s View with Peripheral Information on a Windshield Display. ACM, New York, New York, USA.
[19]
Renate Häuslschmid, Donhao Ren, Florian Alt, Andreas Butz, and Tobias Höllerer. 2019. Personalizing Content Presentation on Large 3D Head-Up Displays. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality 27, 1 (2019), 80–106.
[20]
Renate Häuslschmid, Max von Bülow, Bastian Pfleging, and Andreas Butz. 2017. SupportingTrust in Autonomous Driving. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces(IUI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025198
[21]
Brian L Hills. 1980. Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception 9, 2 (1980), 183–216.
[22]
Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, Levko Ivanchuk, Srikanth Kirshnamachari Sridharan, and Pourang Irani. 2014. SmartColor: Real-time color correction and contrast for optical see-through head-mounted displays. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, 187–194.
[23]
William J Horrey, Christopher D Wickens, and Amy L Alexander. 2003. The effects of head-up display clutter and in-vehicle display separation on concurrent driving performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 47. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1880–1884.
[24]
ISO. 2018. ISO 9241-11 Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts.
[25]
Sofia Jorlöv, Katarina Bohman, and Annika Larsson. 2017. Seating Positions and Activities in Highly Automated Cars–A Qualitative Study of Future Automated Driving Scenarios. In International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact.
[26]
Pooja Kavathekar and YangQuan Chen. 2011. Vehicle platooning: A brief survey and categorization. In ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 829–845.
[27]
Robert S. Kennedy, Norman E. Lane, Kevin S. Berbaum, and Michael G. Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
[28]
Robert S. Kennedy, Kay M. Stanney, and William P. Dunlap. 2000. Duration and Exposure to Virtual Environments: Sickness Curves During and Across Sessions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9, 5(2000), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566952 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566952
[29]
Hyungil Kim, Xuefang Wu, Joseph L. Gabbard, and Nicholas F. Polys. 2013. Exploring Head-up Augmented Reality Interfaces for Crash Warning Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(AutomotiveUI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 224–227. https://doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516566
[30]
Hyang Sook Kim, Sol Hee Yoon, Meen Jong Kim, and Yong Gu Ji. 2015. Deriving Future User Experiences in Autonomous Vehicle. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(AutomotiveUI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809734
[31]
SeungJun Kim and Anind K. Dey. 2009. Simulated Augmented Reality Windshield Display As a Cognitive Mapping Aid for Elder Driver Navigation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518724
[32]
Yung-Ching Liu and Ming-Hui Wen. 2004. Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 5 (2004), 679 – 697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.06.002
[33]
Robert E Llaneras, Jeremy Salinger, and Charles A Green. 2013. Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: Drivers’ allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. (2013).
[34]
Anthony D McDonald, Hananeh Alambeigi, Johan Engström, Gustav Markkula, Tobias Vogelpohl, Jarrett Dunne, and Norbert Yuma. 2019. Toward computational simulations of behavior during automated driving takeovers: a review of the empirical and modeling literatures. Human factors 61, 4 (2019), 642–688.
[35]
Zeljko Medenica, Andrew L. Kun, Tim Paek, and Oskar Palinko. 2011. Augmented Reality vs. Street Views: A Driving Simulator Study Comparing Two Emerging Navigation Aids. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services(MobileHCI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037414
[36]
Erick Mendez and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2009. Importance masks for revealing occluded objects in augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 247–248.
[37]
Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Nicole Perterer, Alexander Mirnig, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. The Vehicle: A Workplace of the Future. In Mensch und Computer 2016 – Workshopband, Benjamin Weyers and Anke Dittmar (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Aachen.
[38]
David Miller, Annabel Sun, Mishel Johns, Hillary Ive, David Sirkin, Sudipto Aich, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Distraction becomes engagement in automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 59. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1676–1680.
[39]
Jane Moeckli, Tim Brown, Ben Dow, Linda Ng Boyle, Chris Schwarz, and Huimin Xiong. 2015. Evaluation of adaptive cruise control interface requirements on the national advanced driving simulator. Technical Report.
[40]
Frederik Naujoks, Yannick Forster, Katharina Wiedemann, and Alexandra Neukum. 2016. Speech improves human-automation cooperation in automated driving. In Mensch und Computer 2016 – Workshopband, Benjamin Weyers and Anke Dittmar (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Aachen.
[41]
Frederik Naujoks, Simon Höfling, Christian Purucker, and Kathrin Zeeb. 2018. From partial and high automation to manual driving: relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 121 (2018), 28–42.
[42]
J. Navarro, M. François, and F. Mars. 2016. Obstacle avoidance under automated steering: Impact on driving and gaze behaviours. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 43 (2016), 315 – 324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.007
[43]
Arthur Padilha and Veronica Teichrieb. 2015. Motion-Aware Ghosted Views for Single Layer Occlusions in Augmented Reality. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Workshops. IEEE, 60–67.
[44]
Byoung-Jun Park, Jeong-Woo Lee, Changrak Yoon, and Kyong-Ho Kim. 2015. Augmented reality and representation in vehicle for safe driving at night. In 2015 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). IEEE, 1261–1263.
[45]
Hye Sun Park, Min Woo Park, Kwang Hee Won, Kyong Ho Kim, and Soon Ki Jung. 2013. In-Vehicle AR-HUD System to Provide Driving-Safety Information. ETRI journal 35, 6 (Dec. 2013), 1038–1047.
[46]
Yiyun Peng, Linda Ng Boyle, and John D Lee. 2014. Reading, typing, and driving: How interactions with in-vehicle systems degrade driving performance. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 27 (2014), 182–191.
[47]
Yu Peng, Jesse S Jin, Suhuai Luo, Min Xu, and Yue Cui. 2012. 3D pose estimation of front vehicle towards a better driver assistance system. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops. IEEE, 522–527.
[48]
Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating User Needs for Non-driving-related Activities During Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia(MUM ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012735
[49]
Bryan Reimer, Anthony Pettinato, Lex Fridman, Joonbum Lee, Bruce Mehler, Bobbie Seppelt, Junghee Park, and Karl Iagnemma. 2016. Behavioral impact of drivers’ roles in automated driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 217–224.
[50]
Ronald A Rensink, J Kevin O’Regan, and James J Clark. 1997. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological science 8, 5 (1997), 368–373.
[51]
Andreas Riegler, Bilal Aksoy, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2020. Gaze-based Interaction with Windshield Displays for Automated Driving: Impact of Dwell Time and Feedback Design on Task Performance and Subjective Workload. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 151–160.
[52]
Andreas Riegler, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2019. AutoWSD: Virtual Reality Automated Driving Simulator for Rapid HCI Prototyping. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3345366
[53]
Andreas Riegler, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2019. Virtual Reality Driving Simulator for User Studies on Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings(AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 502–507. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3349595
[54]
Andreas Riegler, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2018. Investigating User Preferences for Windshield Displays in Automated Vehicles. In the 7th ACM International Symposium. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–7.
[55]
Andreas Riegler, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2019. Augmented Reality Windshield Displays and Their Potential to Enhance User Experience in Automated Driving. i-com 18, 2 (2019), 127–149.
[56]
Clemens Schartmüller, Andreas Riener, Philipp Wintersberger, and Anna-Katharina Frison. 2018. Workaholistic: on balancing typing-and handover-performance in automated driving. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 1–12.
[57]
Clemens Schartmüller, Klemens Weigl, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Marco Steinhauser. 2019. Text Comprehension: Heads-Up vs. Auditory Displays: Implications for a Productive Work Environment in SAE Level 3 Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344547
[58]
Martin Schrepp, Andreas Hinderks, and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2017. Design and Evaluation of a Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 4 (01 2017), 103. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001
[59]
Ronald Schroeter and Fabius Steinberger. 2016. Pokémon DRIVE: Towards Increased Situational Awareness in Semi-Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction(OzCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010973
[60]
Tal Sharfi and David Shinar. 2014. Enhancement of road delineation can reduce safety.Journal of safety research 49 (2014), 61–8.
[61]
Missie Smith, Joseph L Gabbard, and Christian Conley. 2016. Head-up vs. head-down displays: examining traditional methods of display assessment while driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 185–192.
[62]
Society of Automotive Engineers. 2016. SAE J3114 - Human Factors Definitions for Automated Driving and Related Research Topics.
[63]
Srinath Sridhar and Victor Ng-Thow-Hing. 2012. Generation of virtual display surfaces for in-vehicle contextual augmented reality. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, 317–318.
[64]
Srikanth Kirshnamachari Sridharan, Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, David R Flatla, and Pourang Irani. 2013. Color correction for optical see-through displays using display color profiles. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 231–240.
[65]
Philipp Wintersberger, Anna-Katharina Frison, Andreas Riener, and Tamara von Sawitzky. 2019. Fostering User Acceptance and Trust in Fully Automated Vehicles: Evaluating the Potential of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 27, 1 (March 2019), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00320
[66]
Philipp Wintersberger, Clemens Schartmüller, and Andreas Riener. 2019. Attentive User Interfaces to Improve Multitasking and Take-Over Performance in Automated Driving: The Auto-Net of Things. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) 11, 3(2019), 40–58.
[67]
J.S Wolffsohn, N.A McBrien, G.K Edgar, and T Stout. 1998. The influence of cognition and age on accommodation, detection rate and response times when using a car head-up display (HUD). Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 18, 3 (1998), 243 – 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0275-5408(97)00094-X
[68]
Wen Wu, Fabian Blaicher, Jie Yang, Thomas Seder, and Dehua Cui. 2009. A Prototype of Landmark-based Car Navigation Using a Full-windshield Head-up Display System. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Ambient Media Computing(AMC ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1631005.1631012
[69]
Herbert Yoo. 1999. Display of HUD warnings to drivers: Determining an optimal location. (1999).
[70]
Changrak Yoon, Kyongho Kim, Hye Sun Park, Min Woo Park, and Soon Ki Jung. 2014. Development of augmented forward collision warning system for Head-Up Display. In 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 2277–2279.
[71]
Kristie Young, Michael Regan, and M Hammer. 2007. Driver distraction: A review of the literature. Distracted driving 2007(2007), 379–405.
[72]
Mark S Young and Neville A Stanton. 2002. Attention and automation: new perspectives on mental underload and performance. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science 3, 2 (2002), 178–194.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)In-vehicle full-window augmented reality system (FARS) for passengers: effects on spatial knowledge and user experienceVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-01068-y29:1Online publication date: 5-Feb-2025
  • (2023)From Me to We: Combining Driving Simulation and Traffic Simulation for Holistic Usability and Safety ResearchAdjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3581961.3609840(294-296)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Spot’Em: Interactive Data Labeling as a Means to Maintain Situation AwarenessProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3580585.3607163(72-80)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MUM '20: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
November 2020
353 pages
ISBN:9781450388702
DOI:10.1145/3428361
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 November 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. augmented reality
  2. automated driving
  3. focus distance
  4. user study
  5. virtual reality
  6. windshield display

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MUM 2020

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)61
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)In-vehicle full-window augmented reality system (FARS) for passengers: effects on spatial knowledge and user experienceVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-01068-y29:1Online publication date: 5-Feb-2025
  • (2023)From Me to We: Combining Driving Simulation and Traffic Simulation for Holistic Usability and Safety ResearchAdjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3581961.3609840(294-296)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Spot’Em: Interactive Data Labeling as a Means to Maintain Situation AwarenessProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3580585.3607163(72-80)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Human-Vehicle Interaction to Support Driver's Situation Awareness in Automated Vehicles: A Systematic ReviewIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles10.1109/TIV.2022.32008268:3(2551-2567)Online publication date: Mar-2023
  • (2023)A Set of Design Principles for Personalized Information in Automated Driving User Interfaces Based on Theory and Empirical Evidence2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)10.1109/IV55152.2023.10186755(1-6)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Towards Personalized 3D Augmented Reality Windshield Displays in the Context of Automated DrivingFrontiers in Future Transportation10.3389/ffutr.2022.8106983Online publication date: 3-Feb-2022
  • (2022)In-Vehicle Transitional Interfaces: User Journey in Virtual RealityAdjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3544999.3552317(30-33)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2022
  • (2022)A Lab-Based Investigation of Reaction Time and Reading Performance using Different In-Vehicle Reading Interfaces during Self-DrivingProceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3543174.3545254(96-107)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Multimodal Error Correction for Speech-to-Text in a Mobile Office Automated Vehicle: Results From a Remote StudyProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3490099.3511131(496-505)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2022
  • (2022)Content Presentation on 3D Augmented Reality Windshield Displays in the Context of Automated Driving2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR51125.2022.00074(543-552)Online publication date: Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media