skip to main content
10.1145/3428361.3428466acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Non-Urgent Smart Home Notifications using a Smart Plant System

Published:22 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the rise of the Internet of Things, home appliances become connected and they can proactively provide status information to users. Facing a steadily increasing number of notification sources, it is unclear how information from smart home devices should be provided without overloading the users’ attention. In this paper, we investigate the design of non-urgent smart home notifications using a smart plant system. Based on feedback from focus groups, we designed four notification types and compared them in an eight-week in-situ study. We show that notifications displayed on smart home devices are preferred to those received on smartphones. Event-based notifications are unobtrusive, actionable and are preferred to persistent notifications. We derive guidelines that address the need of being in control, opportune locations for notification delivery at opportune moments, notification blindness, the importance of discretizing continuous information, and combining related notifications.

References

  1. Mark Altosaar, Roel Vertegaal, Changuk Sohn, and Daniel Cheng. 2006. AuraOrb: Using Social Awareness Cues in the Design of Progressive Notification Appliances. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments(Sydney, Australia) (OZCHI ’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228175.1228204Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brian P. Bailey and Shamsi T. Iqbal. 2008. Understanding Changes in Mental Workload During Execution of Goal-directed Tasks and Its Application for Interruption Management. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 14, 4, Article 21 (Jan. 2008), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314683.1314689Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Björn Bittner, Ilhan Aslan, Chi Tai Dang, and Elisabeth André. 2019. Of Smarthomes, IoT Plants, and Implicit Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Tempe, Arizona, USA) (TEI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295618Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ann Blandford, Dominic Furniss, and Stephann Makri. 2016. Qualitative HCI research: going behind the scenes. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 9, 1(2016), 1–115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Adam Bodnar, Richard Corbett, and Dmitry Nekrasovski. 2004. AROMA: Ambient Awareness Through Olfaction in a Messaging Application. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (State College, PA, USA) (ICMI ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1145/1027933.1027965Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Susanne Boll, Wilko Heuten, Eike Michael Meyer, and Markus Meis. 2010. Development of a multimodal reminder system for older persons in their residential home. Informatics for health and Social Care 35, 3-4 (2010), 104–124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacky Bourgeois, Janet van der Linden, Gerd Kortuem, Blaine A. Price, and Christopher Rimmer. 2014. Conversations with My Washing Machine: An In-the-wild Study of Demand Shifting with Self-generated Energy. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Seattle, Washington) (UbiComp ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Stephen Brewster, David McGookin, and Christopher Miller. 2006. Olfoto: Designing a Smell-based Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (CHI ’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124869Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yung-Ju Chang, Yi-Ju Chung, Yi-Hao Shih, Hsiu-Chi Chang, and Tzu-Hao Lin. 2017. What Do Smartphone Users Do when They Sense Phone Notifications?. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers(Maui, Hawaii) (UbiComp ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 904–909. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123024.3124557Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, Terry Hemmings, and Steve Benford. 2003. Finding a Place for UbiComp in the Home. In UbiComp 2003: Ubiquitous Computing, Anind K. Dey, Albrecht Schmidt, and Joseph F. McCarthy (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 208–226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mary Czerwinski, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Shamsi Iqbal, and Gloria Mark. 2016. Challenges for Designing Notifications for Affective Computing Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (Heidelberg, Germany) (UbiComp ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1554–1559. https://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968548Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mary Czerwinski, Eric Horvitz, and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A Diary Study of Task Switching and Interruptions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria) (CHI ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Davis, E. B. Owusu, L. Marcenaro, L. Feijs, C. Regazzoni, and J. Hu. 2017. Effects of Ambient Lighting Displays on Peripheral Activity Awareness. IEEE Access 5(2017), 9318–9335. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2703866Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Anja Exler, Christian Dinse, Zeynep Günes, Nadim Hammoud, Steffen Mattes, and Michael Beigl. 2017. Investigating the Perceptibility Different Notification Types on Smartphones Depending on the Smartphone Position. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Maui, Hawaii) (UbiComp ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 970–976. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123024.3124560Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Joel E. Fischer, Chris Greenhalgh, and Steve Benford. 2011. Investigating Episodes of Mobile Phone Activity As Indicators of Opportune Moments to Deliver Notifications. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Stockholm, Sweden) (MobileHCI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Joel E. Fischer, Chris Greenhalgh, and Steve Benford. 2011. Investigating episodes of mobile phone activity as indicators of opportune moments to deliver notifications. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services - MobileHCI ’11 (2011), 181. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rebecca Hansson, Peter Ljungstrand, and Johan Redström. 2001. Subtle and public notification cues for mobile devices. In Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 240–246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Doris Hausen, Sebastian Boring, Clara Lueling, Simone Rodestock, and Andreas Butz. 2012. StaTube: Facilitating State Management in Instant Messaging Systems. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction(Kingston, Ontario, Canada) (TEI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1145/2148131.2148191Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2010. Notifications and Awareness: A Field Study of Alert Usage and Preferences. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Savannah, Georgia, USA) (CSCW ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718926Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sung Woo Kim, Min Chul Kim, Sang Hyun Park, Young Kyu Jin, and Woo Sik Choi. 2004. Gate Reminder: A Design Case of a Smart Reminder. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques(Cambridge, MA, USA) (DIS ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013128Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jennifer Mankoff, Anind K. Dey, Gary Hsieh, Julie Kientz, Scott Lederer, and Morgan Ames. 2003. Heuristic Evaluation of Ambient Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642642Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Gloria Mark, Mary Czerwinski, and Shamsi T. Iqbal. 2018. Effects of Individual Differences in Blocking Workplace Distractions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal, QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2018/02/pn1612-markA.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gloria Mark, Stephen Voida, and Armand Cardello. 2012. ”A Pace Not Dictated by Electrons”: An Empirical Study of Work Without Email. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207754Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tara Matthews, Anind K. Dey, Jennifer Mankoff, Scott Carter, and Tye Rattenbury. 2004. A Toolkit for Managing User Attention in Peripheral Displays. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Santa Fe, NM, USA) (UIST ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029676Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Andrii Matviienko, Vanessa Cobus, Heiko Müller, Jutta Fortmann, Andreas Löcken, Susanne Boll, Maria Rauschenberger, Janko Timmermann, Christoph Trappe, and Wilko Heuten. 2015. Deriving Design Guidelines for Ambient Light Systems. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Linz, Austria) (MUM ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1145/2836041.2836069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Andrii Matviienko, Maria Rauschenberger, Vanessa Cobus, Janko Timmermann, Jutta Fortmann, Andreas Löcken, Heiko Müller, Christoph Trappe, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2015. Towards new ambient light systems: a close look at existing encodings of ambient light systems. Interaction Design and Architecture (s). 2015;(26): 10-24. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. McGee-Lennon, A. Smeaton, and S. Brewster. 2012. Designing home care reminder systems: Lessons learned through co-design with older users. In 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops. 49–56. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248684Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Marilyn Rose McGee-Lennon, Maria Klara Wolters, and Stephen Brewster. 2011. User-centred Multimodal Reminders for Assistive Living. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2105–2114. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Heiko Müller, Anastasia Kazakova, Martin Pielot, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2013. Ambient Timer – Unobtrusively Reminding Users of Upcoming Tasks with Ambient Light. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 211–228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jörg Müller, Dennis Wilmsmann, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, Albrecht Schmidt, Tim Jay, and Antonio Krüger. 2009. Display Blindness: The Effect of Expectations on Attention towards Digital Signage. In Pervasive Computing, Hideyuki Tokuda, Michael Beigl, Adrian Friday, A. J. Bernheim Brush, and Yoshito Tobe(Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jasmin Niess and Paweł W Woźniak. 2020. Embracing Companion Technologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07198(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. T. Okoshi, J. Ramos, H. Nozaki, J. Nakazawa, A. K. Dey, and H. Tokuda. 2015. Attelia: Reducing user’s cognitive load due to interruptive notifications on smart phones. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2015.7146515Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Martin Pielot, Bruno Cardoso, Kleomenis Katevas, Joan Serrà, Aleksandar Matic, and Nuria Oliver. 2017. Beyond Interruptibility: Predicting Opportune Moments to Engage Mobile Phone Users. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 91 (Sept. 2017), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Martin Pielot, Rodrigo de Oliveira, Haewoon Kwak, and Nuria Oliver. 2014. Didn’T You See My Message?: Predicting Attentiveness to Mobile Instant Messages. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3319–3328. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556973Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Martin Pielot and Luz Rello. 2017. Productive, Anxious, Lonely: 24 Hours Without Push Notifications. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Vienna, Austria) (MobileHCI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098526Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ivan Poupyrev, Shigeaki Maruyama, and Jun Rekimoto. 2002. Ambient Touch: Designing Tactile Interfaces for Handheld Devices. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Paris, France) (UIST ’02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/571985.571993Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Zachary Pousman and John Stasko. 2006. A Taxonomy of Ambient Information Systems: Four Patterns of Design. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Venezia, Italy) (AVI ’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133277Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Thijs Roumen, Simon T. Perrault, and Shengdong Zhao. 2015. NotiRing: A Comparative Study of Notification Channels for Wearable Interactive Rings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2497–2500. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702350Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Niels Henze, Tilman Dingler, Martin Pielot, Dominik Weber, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Large-scale Assessment of Mobile Notifications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3055–3064. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ben Shneiderman. 2003. The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations. In The Craft of Information Visualization, BENJAMIN B. BEDERSONand BEN SHNEIDERMAN (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 364 – 371. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-155860915-0/50046-9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ben Shneiderman. 2005. Shneiderman’s eight golden rules of interface design. Retrieved July 25(2005), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Daniel Siewiorek, Asim Smailagic, Junichi Furukawa, Neema Moraveji, Kathryn Reiger, and Jeremy Shaffer. 2003. SenSay: A context-aware mobile phone. Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2003. Proceedings. (2003), 248–249. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2003.1241422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Martin Tomitsch, Karin Kappel, Andreas Lehner, and Thomas Grechenig. 2007. Towards a Taxonomy for Ambient Information Systems.. In Ambient Information Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Martijn H. Vastenburg, David V. Keyson, and Huib de Ridder. 2007. Considerate home notification systems: a field study of acceptability of notifications in the home. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 12, 8 (20 Jun 2007), 555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0176-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Martijn H. Vastenburg, David V. Keyson, and Huib de Ridder. 2009. Considerate Home Notification Systems: A User Study of Acceptability of Notifications in a Living-room Laboratory. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67, 9 (Sept. 2009), 814–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Alexandra Voit, Tonja Machulla, Dominik Weber, Valentin Schwind, Stefan Schneegass, and Niels Henze. 2016. Exploring Notifications in Smart Home Environments. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (Florence, Italy) (MobileHCI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 942–947. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2962661Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Alexandra Voit, Sven Mayer, Valentin Schwind, and Niels Henze. 2019. Online, VR, AR, Lab, and In-Situ: Comparison of Research Methods to Evaluate Smart Artifacts. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 507, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300737Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Alexandra Voit, Marie Olivia Salm, Miriam Beljaars, Stefan Kohn, and Stefan Schneegass. 2018. Demo of a Smart Plant System As an Exemplary Smart Home Application Supporting Non-urgent Notifications. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 936–939. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240231Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Alexandra Voit, Dominik Weber, and Stefan Schneegass. 2016. Towards Notifications in the Era of the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Internet of Things (Stuttgart, Germany) (IoT’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 173–174. https://doi.org/10.1145/2991561.2998472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Torben Wallbaum, Maria Rauschenberger, Janko Timmermann, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne C.J. Boll. 2018. Exploring Social Awareness: A Design Case Study in Minimal Communication. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article CS08, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3174365Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. David Warnock, Marilyn McGee-Lennon, and Stephen Brewster. 2011. The Role of Modality in Notification Performance. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011, Pedro Campos, Nicholas Graham, Joaquim Jorge, Nuno Nunes, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler(Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 572–588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. David Warnock, Marilyn R. McGee-Lennon, and Stephen Brewster. 2011. The Impact of Unwanted Multimodal Notifications. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (Alicante, Spain) (ICMI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/2070481.2070510Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Dominik Weber, Alexandra Voit, Philipp Kratzer, and Niels Henze. 2016. In-situ Investigation of Notifications in Multi-device Environments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Heidelberg, Germany) (UbiComp ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1259–1264. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971732Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J. Higgins. 2011. The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analyses Using Only Anova Procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Manuela Züger, Christopher Corley, André N. Meyer, Boyang Li, Thomas Fritz, David Shepherd, Vinay Augustine, Patrick Francis, Nicholas Kraft, and Will Snipes. 2017. Reducing Interruptions at Work: A Large-Scale Field Study of FlowLight. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MUM '20: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
    November 2020
    353 pages
    ISBN:9781450388702
    DOI:10.1145/3428361

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format