skip to main content
10.1145/3428757.3429122acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Web-based Applications and Services of Annotation in Electronic Commerce

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the advent of the web 2.0, user-centric, consumers are increasingly becoming producers of information. He can express his opinions on the monetary exchange of goods, services and information through annotations. An annotation takes many different forms and is used for many different functions. This annotative activity is carried out by systems specially developed to annotate the products or services of an online commerce web site. In the literature, many tools have been developed to annotate various products and services. In this article, we present a classification of thirty annotation tools developed by industry and academia. This organization of annotation tools is built on the basis of functionalities that they offer. From this classification, we present our observations and the limits of these systems.

References

  1. B. Bickart and R. M. Schindler, 2001. Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information, Journal of interactive marketing, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 31--40. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.1014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. Chaparro-Peláez, A. Hernández-García and A. Urueña-López, 2015. The role of emotions and trust in service recovery in business-to-consumer electronic commerce, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 77--90. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762015000200006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Cui, H. K. Lui, and X. Guo, 2012. The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 39- 58. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415170102 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Lehuédé, 2009. L'internet participatif redonne confiance aux consommateurs, Consommation et modes de vie, no. 222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. P. Singh, S. Irani, N. P. Rana, Y. K. Dwivedi, S. Saumya, and P. K. Roy, 2017. Predicting the "helpfulness" of online consumer reviews, Journal of Business Research, vol. 70, pp. 346--355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. A. Hendrawan, E. Suryani, and R. Oktavia, 2017. Evaluation of e-commerce product reviews based on structural, metadata, and readability characteristics, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 124, pp. 280--286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.157Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. T. Beauvisage, J.S. Beuscart, V. Cardon, K. Mellet, and M. Trespeuch, 2013. Notes et avis des consommateurs sur le web, Réseaux, no. 1, pp. 131--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kalboussi, N. Omheni, O. Mazhoud, and A. H. Kacem, 2015.How to organize the annotation systems in humancomputer environment: Study, classification and observations. In Proceedings of the 15th IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, INTERACT'15, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Springer, (pp. 115--133). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22668-2_11Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bai, Y., Zhang, G., Wang, P., Chen, J., Zhang, T., Cai, F., ... & Liu, L, 2014. The Comparative Analysis between Sensory and Cognitive in Online Customer Reviews of Baby Formula. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (Vol. 2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Kalboussi, O. Mazhoud, and A. H. Kacem, 2013. Annotative Activity as a Potential Source of Web Service Invocation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, WEBIST'13, SciTePress, (pp.288-292).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. 2010. Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS quarterly, 185--200. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Beauvisage, T., Beuscart, J. S., Cardon, V., Mellet, K., & Trespeuch, M. Online Consumer Reviews Design and Consequences of a New Valuation Device.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Kotha, 1998. Competing on the internet: The case of amazon. com, European Management Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 212--222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00089-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. Lendle, M. Olarrega, S. Schropp, and P. L. Vezina, 2013. ebay's anatomy, Economics Letters, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 115--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. C. Vasquez, 2011. Complaints online: The case of tripadvisor, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1707--1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Fogel and S. Zachariah, 2017. Intentions to use the yelp review website and purchase behavior after reading reviews, Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 53--67. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762017000100005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. N. Dutta and A. K. Bhat, 2014. Flipkart: journey of an indian ecommerce start-up, Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/EEMCS-03-2014-0064Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Jensen, 2015. Tripadvisor og trustpilot bestemmer ferie. digital. business. dk. retrieved 17.01. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. B. Tan, S. L. Pan, X. Lu, and L. Huang, 2015. The role of is capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: the digital ecosystem strategy of alibaba. com, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 2. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00393Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Singh, B. Ghutla, R. L. Jnr, A. F. Mohammed, and M. A. Rashid, Walmart's sales data analysis-a big data analytics perspective, in 2017 4th Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE). IEEE, 2017, pp. 114--119. https://doi.org/10.1109/APWConCSE.2017.00028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J.P. Mellinas, S.M. M. María-Dolores, and J. J. B. García, 2015. Booking. com: The unexpected scoring system, Tourism Management, vol. 49, pp. 72--74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. R. E. Petty, J. T. Cacioppo, and D. Schumann, 1983. Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement, Journal of consumer research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 135--146. https://doi.org/10.1086/208954Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. U. Matzat and C. Snijders, 2012. Rebuilding trust in online shops on consumer review sites: Sellers' responses to usergenerated complaints, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 62--79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01594.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. V. Sharma and H. Karnick, 2016. Automatic tagging and retrieval of e-commerce products based on visual features, in Proceedings of the NAACL Student Research Workshop, pp. 22--28. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. A. Kalboussi, O. Mazhoud, and A. H. Kacem, 2016. Comparative study of web annotation systems used by learners to enhance educational practices: features and services. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(2), 129--150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2016.078081 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. K.P. Yee, 2002. Critlink: advanced hyperlinks enable public annotation on the web, University of California, Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. S. Asharaf and M. S. Abdulla, 2013. Scope of ontological annotation in e-commerce, International Journal of Business Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 335--347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2013.056721 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. K. Tanaka, K. Kunze, M. Iwata, and K. Kise, 2014. Memory specs: an annotation system on google glass using document image retrieval, in Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, UbiComp'14, pp. 267--270. https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2638775 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. B. Hernàndez, J. Jiménez, and M. J. Martin, 2010. Customer behavior in electronic commerce: The moderating effect of e-purchasing experience, Journal of business research, vol. 63, no. 9-10, pp. 964--971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. K. Tanaka, M. Iwata, K. Kunze, M. Iwamura, and K. Kise, 2013. Share me-a digital annotation sharing service for paper documents with multiple clients support, in 2013 2nd IAPR Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, pp. 779--782. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACPR.2013.182 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. T. Hayashi, Y. Wang, Y. Kawai, and K. Sumiya, 2018. An ecommerce recommender system using complaint data and review data. in IUI Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S.C. Necula, V.D. Pavaloaia, C. Strîmbei, and O. Dospinescu, 2018. Enhancement of e-commerce websites with semantic web technologies, Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 1955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061955Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. R. East, K. Hammond, and M. Wright, 2007. The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category study, International journal of research in marketing, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175--184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.12.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. M. Lee, S. Rodgers, and M. Kim, 2009. Effects of valence and extremity of ewom on attitude toward the brand and website, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2009.10505262Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. H. Liu, Y. Feng, X. Song, and L. Chen, 2019. The impact of merchant's response to negative reviews on consumers' purchase intention, in the 16th International Con- ference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM). IEEE, pp. 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887857Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. C. M. Cheung, M. K. Lee, and C. Wagner, Introduction to social media and e-business transformation minitrack, in 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2014, pp. 550--550. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.94 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. M. N. Hajli, 2014. A study of the impact of social media on consumers, International Journal of Market Research, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 387--404. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2014-025Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. N. Hajli, 2015. Social commerce constructs and consumer's intention to buy, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 183--191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. P. Pu, L. Chen, and R. Hu, 2011. A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems, in Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pp. 157--164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2043932.2043962 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Y. Lu, R. Dong, and B. Smyth, 2018. Coevolutionary recommendation model: Mutual learning between ratings and reviews, in Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference WWW'18, pp. 773--782. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186158 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. S. Aciar, D. Zhang, S. Simoff, and J. Debenham, 2007. Informed recommender: Basing recommendations on consumer product reviews, IEEE Intelligent systems, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 39--47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.55 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. X. Fang and J. Zhan, 2015. Sentiment analysis using product review data, Journal of Big Data, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-015-0015-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Kalboussi, A., Mazhoud, O., Omheni, N., & Kacem, A. H. 2014. A new annotation system based on a semantic analysis of a learner's annotative activity to invoke web services. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 9(4), 350--370. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2014.065447 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Kalboussi, A., Omheni, N., Mazhoud, O., & Kacem, A. H. 2015a. An interactive annotation system to support the learner with web services assistance. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT'15, (pp. 409--410). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.57 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Kalboussi, A., Mazhoud, O., & Kacem, A. H. 2016b. Functionalities provided by annotation systems for learners in educational context: An overview. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(2), 4--11. https://doi.org/10.3991/iiet.v11i02.5166Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Chehab, K., Kalboussi, A., & Kacem, A. H. (2018). Study of Annotations in e-health Domain. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Smart homes and health Telematics, ICOST'18, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Springer, (pp. 189--199). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94523-117Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Web-based Applications and Services of Annotation in Electronic Commerce

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      iiWAS '20: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
      November 2020
      492 pages

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 January 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader