skip to main content
10.1145/3429290.3429293acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesindiahciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards the Identification of Dark Patterns: An Analysis Based on End-User Reactions

Published:27 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

A dark pattern is a user interface that purposefully deceives users for the benefit of the business by influencing their decision making process. The objectives of this research paper are three-fold. The first objective is to determine the difference in the susceptibility of the users to the different types of dark patterns. The second is to identify the underlying factors that make users victims of the different types of dark patterns. The third objective is to identify the difference in the impact on the users, caused by the least identified and the most identified dark pattern. This paper presents five elements that play an important role in the identification of dark patterns by the users, even if they are not completely aware of the unethical intentions behind the design. In addition to that, a taxonomy is formed with the factors that trigger the users towards dark patterns. Strong correlations and associations between these five elements and the user's ability to identify dark patterns are found. It was also found that the correlations between the elements differ from the type of dark pattern in consideration. This paper helps in understanding the factors that influence the users to become victims of dark patterns and the difference in the impact of the different types of dark patterns on the user. The variables and factors of identification determined in this research can benefit the HCI community to understand the adverse effects of dark patterns on usability.

References

  1. Jamie Luguri and Lior Strahilevitz. 2019. Shining a Light on Dark Patterns. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431205Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dark Patterns: User Interfaces Designed to Trick People ... Retrieved October 9, 2020 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KVyFio8gw4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christoph Bösch, Benjamin Erb, Frank Kargl, Henning Kopp, and Stefan Pfattheicher. 2016. Tales from the Dark Side: Privacy Dark Strategies and Privacy Dark Patterns. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2016, 4: 237–254. http://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2016-0038Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Jason Brier, and Colin M. Gray. 2018. Dark Intentions or Persuasion? Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - DIS '18. http://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205417Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bj Fogg. 2009. A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive '09. http://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B.j. Fogg. 2003. Computers as persuasive social actors. Persuasive Technology: 89–120. http://doi.org/10.1016/b978-155860643-2/50007-xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Colin M. Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L. Toombs. 2018. The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. http://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Colin M. Gray and Shruthi Sai Chivukula. 2019. Ethical Mediation in UX Practice. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. http://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300408Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jill J. Francis, Marie Johnston, Clare Robertson, 2010. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology & Health 25, 10: 1229–1245. http://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Daniel Kahneman. 2015. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Maximilian Maier. 2019. Dark patterns – An end user perspective. Retrieved 2020 from http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1330920/FULLTEXT01.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Şebnem Özdemir. 2019. Digital nudges and dark patterns: The angels and the archfiends of digital communication. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 35, 2: 417–428. http://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Susan Weinschenk. 2013. How to get people to do stuff: master the art and science of persuasion and motivation. New Riders, Berkeley, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin Books, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ari Ezra Waldman. 2020. Cognitive biases, dark patterns, and the ‘privacy paradox.’ Current Opinion in Psychology 31: 105–109. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.025Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Chris Lewis. 2014. Understanding Motivational Dark Patterns. Irresistible Apps:99–102. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-6422-4_8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IndiaHCI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 2020
    129 pages
    ISBN:9781450389440
    DOI:10.1145/3429290

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 December 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate33of93submissions,35%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format