skip to main content
10.1145/3429290.3429297acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesindiahciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Rethinking Design of Digital Platforms for Emergent Users: Findings from a Study with Rural Indian Farmers

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

With increasing penetration of low cost smartphones and affordable data plans in developing countries like India, there is a definite potential that the benefits of access to information can reach a wider audience. However, researchers have also been cognizant that many from this segment are first time users of digital technology and are limited by low text-literacy and low capability to handle and use digital platforms. The established norms of application building for a more tech-savvy and text-literate audience might need to be revisited. We conduct detailed interviews in an ecologically valid setting with 20 farmers from rural Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh to understand the information seeking behaviour and culture of digital platform usage among these populations. Through these interviews we are able to distill some very salient characteristics of the new Internet users and draw a broad set of guidelines for designing information systems for these users. We find the constructs of trust, external invisibility, peers and family play a very important role in the uptake of digital platforms in addition to the accessibility features of text-free design.

References

  1. Agrimedia. [n.d.]. AgriMedia Video App. http://www.agrimediavideoapp.com/. Accessed: 18/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Abhijit Ahaskar. 2019. India has second-largest population of monthly active internet users: report. https://www.livemint.com/technology/tech-news/india-has-second-largest-population-of-monthly-active-internet-users-report-1569500591581.html. Accessed: 18/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Steven J. Jackson, Maruf Zaber, Mehrab Bin Morshed, Md. Habibullah Bin Ismail, and Sharmin Afrose. 2013. Ecologies of Use and Design: Individual and Social Practices of Mobile Phone Use within Low-Literate Rickshawpuller Communities in Urban Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Computing for Development (Cape Town, South Africa) (ACM DEV-4 ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2537052.2537066Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Agri App. [n.d.]. Agri App. https://www.agriapp.co.in/page?name=about-us. Accessed: 18/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Devanuj Balkrishan, Anirudha Joshi, Chandni Rajendran, Nazreen Nizam, Chinmay Parab, and Sujit Devkar. 2016. Making and breaking the user-usage model: Whatsapp adoption amongst emergent users in India. In Proceedings of the 8th Indian Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 52–63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Christine L. Borgman. 1996. Why are online catalogs still hard to use?Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47, 7(1996), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199607)47:7<493::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-PGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dipanjan Chakraborty. 2018. Building ICT-Based Information Flows to Improve Citizen-Government Engagement. Ph.D. Dissertation. IIT Delhi, IIT Delhi, New Delhi, India, 110016. http://www.cse.iitd.ac.in/~dipanjan/misc/thesis.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dipanjan Chakraborty, Mohd Sultan Ahmad, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2017. Findings from a Civil Society Mediated and Technology Assisted Grievance Redressal Model in Rural India. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Lahore, Pakistan) (ICTD ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dipanjan Chakraborty, Akshay Gupta, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2019. Experiences from a Mobile-based Behaviour Change Campaign on Maternal and Child Nutrition in Rural India. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Ahmedabad, India) (ICTD ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287110Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dipanjan Chakraborty, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2013. Man Versus Machine: Evaluating IVR Versus a Live Operator for Phone Surveys in India. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development (Bangalore, India) (ACM DEV ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442882.2442891Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dipanjan Chakraborty and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2015. Building Citizen Engagement into the Implementation of Welfare Schemes in Rural India. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Singapore, Singapore) (ICTD ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. William Davies. 2020. What’s wrong with WhatsApp. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jul/02/whatsapp-groups-conspiracy-theories-disinformation-democracy. Accessed: 05/07/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Renee Dutta. 2009. Information needs and information-seeking behavior in developing countries: A review of the research. The International Information & Library Review 41, 1 (2009), 44 – 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iilr.2008.12.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. The Indian Express. 2019. Only 44.2% class 5 students in govt schools can read class 2 level text: ASER report. https://indianexpress.com/article/education/only-44-2-class-5-students-can-read-class-2-level-text-aser-report-5539647/. Accessed: 18/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Marie Fazio. 2020. 3 Die in New Mexico After Drinking Hand Sanitizer, Officials Say. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/26/us/3-dead-drinking-hand-sanitizer.html. Accessed: 30/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Google. [n.d.]. The Next Billion Users. https://www.blog.google/technology/next-billion-users/. Accessed: 18/03/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacek Gwizdka. 2010. Distribution of cognitive load in Web search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 11 (2010), 2167–2187. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21385Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Morten Hertzum, Hans H.K Andersen, Verner Andersen, and Camilla B Hansen. 2002. Trust in information sources: seeking information from people, documents, and virtual agents. Interacting with Computers 14, 5 (10 2002), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(02)00023-1 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-pdf/14/5/575/2091166/iwc14-0575.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Manuela Hinderhofer. 2017. It really has the potential to cause problems!südostasien–Zeitschrift für Politik• Kultur• Dialog 33, 3(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ya-Hui Hsieh and Chin-Chung Tsai. 2014. Students’ Scientific Epistemic Beliefs, Online Evaluative Standards, and Online Searching Strategies for Science Information: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Load Experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology 23, 3 (01 Jun 2014), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9464-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Matt Jones, Simon Robinson, Jennifer Pearson, Manjiri Joshi, Dani Raju, Charity Chao Mbogo, Sharon Wangari, Anirudha Joshi, Edward Cutrell, and Richard Harper. 2017. Beyond “yesterday’s tomorrow”: future-focused mobile interaction design by and for emergent users. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 21, 1 (2017), 157–171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Anirudha Joshi. 2013. Technology adoption by ’emergent’ users: the user-usage model. In Proceedings of the 11th Asia Pacific conference on computer human interaction. 28–38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Zahir Koradia and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2012. PhonePeti: exploring the role of an answering machine system in a community radio station in India. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Atlanta, Georgia) (ICTD ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1145/2160673.2160708Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Robin Mansell. 2002. From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge societies. Current sociology 50, 3 (2002), 407–426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Dominic W. Massaro, Michael M. Cohen, Sharon Daniel, and Ronald A. Cole. 1999. Chapter 7 - Developing and Evaluating conversational Agents. In Human Performance and Ergonomics, P.A. Hancock (Ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, 173 – 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012322735-5/50008-7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. I. Medhi, A. Sagar, and K. Toyama. 2006. Text-Free User Interfaces for Illiterate and Semi-Literate Users. In 2006 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTD.2006.301841Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sohini Mitter. 2020. With half a billion active users, Indian internet is more rural, local, mobile-first than ever. https://yourstory.com/2020/05/half-billion-active-users-indian-internet-rural-local-mobile-first. Accessed: 18/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Aparna Moitra, Vishnupriya Das, Gram Vaani, Archna Kumar, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2016. Design Lessons from Creating a Mobile-based Community Media Platform in Rural India. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (ICTD ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909609.2909670Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. World Summit on the Information Society. 2003. Declaration of Principles. Building the Information Society: a global challenge in the new Millennium. https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html. Accessed: 17/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jennifer Pearson, Simon Robinson, Thomas Reitmaier, Matt Jones, Shashank Ahire, Anirudha Joshi, Deepak Sahoo, Nimish Maravi, and Bhakti Bhikne. 2019. StreetWise: Smart speakers vs human help in public slum settings. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Archana Prasad, Sean Blagsvedt, Tej Pochiraju, and Indrani Medhi Thies. 2019. Dara: A Chatbot to Help Indian Artists and Designers Discover International Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition. 626–632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Agha Ali Raza, Farhan Ul Haq, Zain Tariq, Mansoor Pervaiz, Samia Razaq, Umar Saif, and Roni Rosenfeld. 2013. Job opportunities through entertainment: Virally spread speech-based services for low-literate users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2803–2812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Isabella Richiello. 2018. Women’s experience of a sexual and reproductive health chatbot.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nithya Sambasivan, Nimmi Rangaswamy, Ed Cutrell, and Bonnie Nardi. 2009. Ubicomp4D: Infrastructure and Interaction for International Development–the Case of Urban Indian Slums. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Orlando, Florida, USA) (UbiComp ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1145/1620545.1620570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Vivek Srinivasan, Vibhore Vardhan, Snigdha Kar, Siddhartha Asthana, Rajendran Narayanan, Pushpendra Singh, Dipanjan Chakraborty, Amarjeet Singh, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2013. Airavat: An Automated System to Increase Transparency and Accountability in Social Welfare Schemes in India. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes - Volume 2 (Cape Town, South Africa) (ICTD ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2517899.2517937Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Kisaan Knowledge Management System. [n.d.]. Kisaan Call Centre. https://dackkms.gov.in/account/aboutus.aspx. Accessed: 18/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Didem Tali. 2015. India’s Rural Farmers Struggle to Read and Write. Here’s How “AgriApps” Might Change That. https://www.good.is/articles/agricultural-apps-bridge-literacy-gaps-in-india. Accessed: 18/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Indrani Medhi Thies, Nandita Menon, Sneha Magapu, Manisha Subramony, and Jacki O’neill. 2017. How do you want your chatbot? An exploratory Wizard-of-Oz study with young, urban Indians. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 441–459.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. UNESCO. 2013. Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Teaching and Learning: Achieving Quality for all. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000225654. Accessed: 18/06/2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Gram Vaani. 2018. Personal Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Aditya Vashistha and William Thies. 2012. IVR Junction: Building Scalable and Distributed Voice Forums in the Developing World. In 6th Usenix/ACM Workshop on Networked Systems for Developing regions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Rajesh Veeraraghavan. 2013. Dealing with the Digital Panopticon: The Use and Subversion of ICT in an Indian Bureaucracy. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers - Volume 1 (Cape Town, South Africa) (ICTD ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1145/2516604.2516631Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Marion Walton, Vera Vukovic’, and Gary Marsden. 2002. ’Visual literacy’as challenge to the internationalisation of interfaces: a study of South African student web users. In CHI’02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 530–531.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. David L. Waltz. 1978. An English Language Question Answering System for a Large Relational Database. Commun. ACM 21, 7 (July 1978), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1145/359545.359550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Susan Wyche. 2015. Exploring Mobile Phone and Social Media Use in a Nairobi Slum: A Case for Alternative Approaches to Design in ICTD. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Singapore, Singapore). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Lotfi A. Zadeh. 2006. Chapter 9 From search engines to question answering systems - The problems of world knowledge, relevance, deduction and precisiation. In Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web, Elie Sanchez (Ed.). Capturing Intelligence, Vol. 1. Elsevier, 163 – 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-9576(06)80011-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jennifer Zamora. 2020. 28 Days Later: New Internet Users in Brazil and India Try a Lite Smartphone for a Month. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (Ecuador) (COMPASS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3378393.3402247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IndiaHCI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 2020
    129 pages
    ISBN:9781450389440
    DOI:10.1145/3429290

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 December 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate33of93submissions,35%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format