skip to main content
10.1145/3429290.3429308acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesindiahciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

AasaNatak - Assisting Amateur theatre groups through live performance tracking and group management: A study on amateur theatre groups using user centric research methodologies to provide possible solutions for streamlining play practice and performance

Published:27 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Theatre play creation is a long process which may take anywhere from a few weeks to a year. Creating a theatre production requires persistence from a theatre group and its members. In amateur theatre groups, this can be difficult, since coordinating a group of people for a certain amount of time becomes a challenge when most members juggle between their day job and practice sessions. This often results in lower turnout of members during practice sessions which impacts the production's creative vision. Second, through this study, it was identified that error rates were significantly high in sound and light management in productions with less practice time. The study included several methods such as contextual inquiry, competitive analysis, Hierarchical Task Analysis, SHERPA and a questionnaire. Based on insights gained, the proposed intervention is a HCI based solution consisting of a mobile application paired with a wearable computing device and optional sensors for voice within the performing space. This concept will make communication faster and enhance coordination among group members. It will also reduce the impact of absence of a theatre member on play quality and will help in error-reduction in light and sound management.

References

  1. Chandra, P., & Jairazbhoy, N. (2018, May 28). Modern theatre. Retrieved August 08, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/art/South-Asian-arts/Modern-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. . Nicholson, H., Holdsworth, N., & Milling, J. (2019). The ecologies of amateur theatre. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50810-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ananda Lal, “Group Theatre” in The Oxford Companion to Indian Theatre ed. Ananda Lal (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2004), 138-39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2007). Performing arts and the art of performing – On co-construction of project work and professional identities in theatres. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 354-364. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.00Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Richmond, F. P., Swann, D. L., & Zarrilli, P. B. (2007). Indian theatre: traditions of performance. M. Banarsidass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Holdsworth, N., Milling, J., & Nicholson, H. (2017). Theatre, Performance, and the Amateur Turn. Contemporary Theatre Review, 27(1), 4-17. doi:10.1080/10486801.2017.1266229Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ridout, N. (2013). Passionate Amateurs: Theatre, Communism, and Love. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1gk08bnGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8. Raven, M. E., & Flanders, A. (1996). Using contextual inquiry to learn about your audiences. ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation, 20 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/227614.227615Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gault, R. H. (1907). A History of the Questionnaire Method of Research in Psychology. The Pedagogical Seminary, 14 (3), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08919402.1907.10532551Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hollnagel, E. (2010). Handbook of cognitive task design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Presss. doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9781410607775Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stanton, N. (2004). Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA). Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. doi:10.1201/9780203489925.ch37Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Fleisher, C. S., & Bensoussan, B. E. (2009). Business and competitive analysis: Effective application of new and classic methods. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development,53 (4), 5-23. doi:10.1007/bf02504682Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14J ohnson, K. A. (2011, June 04). Theatrical Productions and Digital Technology: Innovations in and Implications of Digital Production Technology in Regional Theatre. Retrieved August 8, 2020, from https://library.uoregon.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]Hume, M., Mort, G. S., & Winzar, H. (2007). Exploring repurchase intention in a performing arts context: Who comes? and why do they come back? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing,12 (2), 135-148. doi:10.1002/nvsm.284Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IndiaHCI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 2020
    129 pages
    ISBN:9781450389440
    DOI:10.1145/3429290

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 December 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate33of93submissions,35%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format