skip to main content
10.1145/3429360.3468179acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasian-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HyperButton: In-video Question Answering via Interactive Buttons and Hyperlinks

Published:07 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the advantages of video-based learning content, the video involves learners as passive viewers instead of active participants. We first conducted formative interviews with 12 participants to investigate natural user behaviors when learners have questions while watching online video lectures, and the result reveals that learners usually use web search to find answers for questions. Based on the formative interview results, we designed and developed HyperButton, an interactive video interface that supports collaborative question answering via in-video buttons and hyperlinks. In the user study, we find that HyperButton significantly improves the usability of the video interface. We further discuss design implications for an interactive video interface augmented with learner-generated material at scale.

References

  1. M. Bochicchio and N. Fiore. 2005. Teacher-Centered Production of Hypervideo for Distance Learning. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol. 3 (2005), 19–34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Nuno Correia and Teresa Chambel. 1999. Active Video Watching Using Annotation. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Part 2) (Orlando, Florida, USA) (MULTIMEDIA ’99). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/319878.319919Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bintao Dai, Yuan Zhang, Dejun Cai, and Anman Wang. 2017. HTML5-based interactive media editing system. In 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC). IEEE, 1185–1189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. John Doherty, Andreas Girgensohn, Jonathan Helfman, Frank Shipman, and Lynn Wilcox. 2003. Detail-on-Demand Hypervideo. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Berkeley, CA, USA) (MULTIMEDIA ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 600–601. https://doi.org/10.1145/957013.957140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. DuFour and R. DuFour. 2013. Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work TM. Solution Tree Press. https://books.google.ad/books?id=9mQXBwAAQBAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Elena L. Glassman, Juho Kim, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2015. Mudslide: A Spatially Anchored Census of Student Confusion for Online Lecture Videos. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1555–1564. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Philip J. Guo, Julia M. Markel, and Xiong Zhang. 2020. Learnersourcing at Scale to Overcome Expert Blind Spots for Introductory Programming: A Three-Year Deployment Study on the Python Tutor Website. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (Virtual Event, USA) (L@S ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 301–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386527.3406733Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. I. Kazanidis, G. Palaigeorgiou, . Papadopoulou, and A. Tsinakos. 2018. Augmented Interactive Video : Enhancing Video Interactivity for the School Classroom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Juho Kim. 2014. Learnersourcing : Improving video learning with collective learner activity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Juho Kim, Philip J. Guo, Carrie J. Cai, Shang-Wen (Daniel) Li, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, and Robert C. Miller. 2014. Data-driven Interaction Techniques for Improving Navigation of Educational Videos. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (UIST ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647389Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Juho Kim, Phu Tran Nguyen, Sarah Weir, Philip J. Guo, Robert C. Miller, and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2014. Crowdsourcing Step-by-step Information Extraction to Enhance Existing How-to Videos. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4017–4026. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556986Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ines Kožuh, Zoran Jeremić, Andrej Sarjaš, Julija Lapuh Bele, Vladan Devedžić, and Matjaž Debevc. 2015. Social presence and interaction in learning environments: The effect on student success. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 18, 1 (2015), 223–236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Britta Meixner. 2017. Hypervideos and Interactive Multimedia Presentations. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 1, Article 9 (March 2017), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3038925Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Nathan, K. Koedinger, and M. Alibali. 2001. Expert Blind Spot : When Content Knowledge Eclipses Pedagogical Content Knowledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. George Palaigeorgiou, Anthia Papadopoulou, and Ioannis Kazanidis. 2019. Interactive Video for Learning: A Review of Interaction Types, Commercial Platforms, and Design Guidelines. In Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education, Meni Tsitouridou, José A. Diniz, and Tassos A. Mikropoulos (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 503–518.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Filip Radlinski, Robert Kleinberg, and Thorsten Joachims. 2008. Learning diverse rankings with multi-armed bandits. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning. 784–791.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C.M. Reigeluth and A.A. Carr-Chellman. 2009. Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume III: Building a Common Knowledge Base. Number v. 3 in Instructional-design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=csqLAgAAQBAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nitin ”Nick” Sawhney, David Balcom, and Ian E. Smith. [n.d.]. In Hypertext.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Niels Seidel. 2015. Interaction Design Patterns for Spatio-Temporal Annotations in Video Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (Kaufbeuren, Germany) (EuroPLoP ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2855321.2855338Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Frank Shipman, Andreas Girgensohn, and Lynn Wilcox. 2005. Hypervideo Expression: Experiences with Hyper-Hitchcock. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Salzburg, Austria) (HYPERTEXT ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/1083356.1083401Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joseph Jay Williams, Juho Kim, Anna Rafferty, Samuel Maldonado, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Walter S. Lasecki, and Neil Heffernan. 2016. AXIS: Generating Explanations at Scale with Learnersourcing and Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (Edinburgh, Scotland, UK) (L@S ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2876042Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wei Zhu, Jun Zang, and Hiroaki Tobita. 2020. Wordy: Interactive Word Cloud to Summarize and Browse Online Videos to Enhance eLearning. In 2020 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). IEEE, 879–884.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    Asian CHI '21: Proceedings of the Asian CHI Symposium 2021
    May 2021
    228 pages

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 September 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format