ABSTRACT
Due to the characteristics and rapid development of social media, social commerce allows the original traditional e-commerce to break through the old framework, forming a new e-commerce framework that combines social commerce and social media. As social media gets closer and closer to consumers, companies are willing to establish communication channels with consumers in social commerce, making social commerce a major research area in today's e-commerce. This study reviews the previous literature on social commerce and finds that the main research topics are purchase intention, loyalty, co-creation, and trust in social commerce. In addition, we suggest possible research gaps in social commerce as a reference for further research.
- Adel M. Aladwani. 2018. A quality-facilitated socialization model of social commerce decisions. Int. J. Inf. Manage., 40, 1--7. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baymond A. Bauer. 1960. Consumer behavior as risk taking. Chicago, IL, 384--398.Google Scholar
- Hatem Bugshan. and Razaz Waheeb Attar. 2020. Social commerce information sharing and their impact on consumers. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change., 153, 119875.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Efthymios Constantinides and Stefan J. Fountain. 2008. Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues. J. Interact. Market, 9(3), 231--244.Google Scholar
- Francesca Cabiddu, Manuela De Carlo and Gabriele Piccoli. 2014. Social media affordances: Enabling customer engagement. Ann. tour. res., 48, 175--192.Google Scholar
- Jun Chen, and Xiao-Liang Shen. 2015. Consumers' decisions in social commerce context: An empirical investigation. Decis. Support Syst., 79, 55--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xusen Cheng, Yu Gu, and Jia Shen. 2019. An integrated view of particularized trust in social commerce: An empirical investigation. Int. J. Inf. Manage., 45, 1--12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xueyan Dong, and Tienan Wang. 2018. Social tie formation in Chinese online social commerce: The role of IT affordances. Int. J. Inf. Manage., 42, 49--64.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Samira Farivar, Ofir Turel, and Yufei Yuan. 2018. Skewing users' rational risk considerations in social commerce: An empirical examination of the role of social identification. Inf. Manage., 55(8), 1038--1048.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yu-Hui Fang, and Chia-Ying Li. 2020. Leveraging sociability for trust building on social commerce sites. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 40, 100907.Google ScholarDigital Library
- James J. Gibson. 2014. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Omer Gibreel, Dhari A. AlOtaibi and Jörn Altmann. 2018. Social commerce development in emerging markets. Electron Commer Res Appl., 27, 152--162.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grabner-Kräuter Sonja. 2009. Web 2.0 social networks: the role of trust. J. Bus. Ethics., 90(4), 505--522.Google Scholar
- Kuo-Lun Hsiao, Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin, Xiang-Ying Wang, His-Peng Lu and Hueiju Yu. 2010. Antecedents and consequences of trust in online product recommendations. Online Information Review.Google Scholar
- Nick Hajli. 2015. Social commerce constructs and consumer's intention to buy. Int. J. Inf. Manage., 35(2), 183--191. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nick Hajli, Yichuan Wang, Mina Tajvidi and M. Sam Hajli. 2017. People, technologies, and organizations interactions in a social commerce era. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage, 64(4), 594--604.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tao Hu, Hua Dai, and A. F. Salam. 2019. Integrative qualities and dimensions of social commerce: Toward a unified view. Inf. Manage., 56(2), 249--270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhao Huang and Benyoucef Morad. 2013. From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 12(4), 246--259.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sanghyun Kim and Hyunsun Park. 2013. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers' trust and trust performance. Int. J. Inf. Manage., 33(2), 318--332.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sang-Heui Lee, David DeWester, and So Ra Park. 2008. Web 2.0 and opportunities for small businesses. Service Business, 2(4), 335--345.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter Leitner, and Grechenig Thoms. Scalable social software services: towards a shopping community model based on analyses of established web service components and functions. 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul M. Leonardi. 2011. When flexible routines meeting flexible technologies affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q., 147--167. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ting-Peng Liang and Efraim Turban. 2011. Introduction to the special issue social commerce: a research framework for social commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commer., 16(2), 5--14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul M. Leonardi. 2013. When does technological use enable network chance in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q., 749--775. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baozhou Lu, Weiguo Fan, and Mi Zhou. 2016. Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Comput. Hum. Behav., 56, 225--237. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiabao Lin, Zhimei Luo, Xusen Cheng and Lei Li. 2019. Understanding the interplay of social commerce affordances and swift guanxi: An empirical study. Inf. Manage., 56(2), 213--224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chia-Ying Li. 2019. How social commerce constructs influence customers' social shopping intention? An empirical study of a social commerce website. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change., 144, 282--294.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xiaolin Lin, Xuequn Wang and Nick Hajli. 2019. Building E-commerce satisfaction and boosting sales: The role of social commerce trust and its antecedents. Int. J. Electron. Commer., 23(3), 328--363.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jiabao Lin, Jinyuan Guo, Ofir Turel and Shan Liu. 2020. Purchasing organic food with social commerce: An integrated food-technology consumption values perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manage., 51, 102033.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lai-Ying Leong, Teck-Soon Hew, Keng-Boon Ooi and Alain Yee-Loong Chong. 2020. Predicting the antecedents of trust in social commerce--A hybrid structural equation modeling with neural network approach. J. Bus. Res., 110, 24--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeff McCarthy, Jennifer Rowley, Jane Ashworth Catherine and Pioch, Elke. 2014. Managing brand presence through social media: the case of UK football clubs. Internet res.Google Scholar
- Sebastian Molinillo, Rafael Anaya-Sánchez, and Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas. 2020. Analyzing the effect of social support and community factors on customer engagement and its impact on loyalty behaviors toward social commerce websites. Comput. Hum. Behav., 108, 105980.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Celeste See-Pui Ng. 2013. Intention to purchase on social commerce websites across cultures: A cross-regional study. Inf. Manage., 50(8), 609--620. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Coimbatore K. Prahalad, and Venkat Ramaswamy. 2004. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Market., 18(3), 5--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hyojung Park and Glen T. Cameron. 2014. Keeping it real: Exploring the roles of conversational human voice and source credibility in crisis communication via blogs. Journal Mass Commun Q., 91(3), 487--507.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric W. K. See-To, and Kevin K. W. Ho. 2014. Value co-creation and purchase intention in social network sites: The role of electronic Word-of-Mouth and trust--A theoretical analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav., 31, 182--189. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohana Shanmugam, Shiwei Sun, Asra Amidi, Farzad Khani and Fariborz Khani. 2016. The applications of social commerce constructs. Int. J. Inf. Manage., 36(3), 425--432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuan Sun, Xiang Shao, Xiaotong Li, Yue Guo and Kun Nie. 2019. How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance perspective. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 37, 100886.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mina Tajvidi, Yichuan Wang, Nick Hajli and Peter. E.D. Love. 2017. Brand value Co-creation in social commerce: The role of interactivity, social support, and relationship quality. Comput. Hum. Behav., 105238.Google Scholar
- Mina Tajvidi, Marine-Odile Richard, YiChung Wang and Nick Hajli. 2018. Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media. J. Bus. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
- Rolf T. Wigand, Robert I. Benjamin and Johanna L. H. Birkland. (2008, August). Web 2.0 and beyond: implications for electronic commerce. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Electronic commerce (pp. 1--5). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ping Zhang and Chingning Wang. 2012. The evolution of social commerce: an examination from the people, business, technology, and information perspective. Communications of the AIS (CAIS), 31, 105--127.Google Scholar
- Imene Ben Yahia, Nasser Al-Neama and Laoucine Kerbache. 2018. Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 41, 11--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jewoo Yeon, Inyoung Park and Daeho Lee. 2019. What creates trust and who gets loyalty in social commerce? J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 50, 138--144.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chun-Lin Yuan, Hakil Moon, Kyuan Hoon Kim and Shuman Wang. 2019. The influence of parasocial relationship in fashion web on customer equity. J. Bus. Res. (in press).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lina Zhuo, Ping Zhang, and Hans-Dieter Zimmermann. 2013. Social commerce research: An integrated view. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 12(2), 61--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Social Commerce Research: A Literature Review
Recommendations
The driving forces of Facebook social commerce
Trust is viewed as a crucial factor in social commerce due to the prominent role and significant amount of peer-generated contents. The current study aims to investigate the relationship between trust in social commerce and customers' purchase ...
Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention
Lacking the presence of human and social elements is claimed one major weakness that is hindering the growth of e-commerce. The emergence of social commerce might help ameliorate this situation. Social commerce is a new evolution of e-commerce that ...
Does friendship quality matter in social commerce? An experimental study of its effect on purchase intention
Friendship plays a critical role in social commerce in contemporary societies. This study aims to theorize and examine how friendship quality impacts purchase intention. Product-related risk is introduced to gain insight into its moderating effects on ...
Comments