skip to main content
10.1145/3429395.3429406acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmisncConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Determinants of We-intention for Continue Playing FPS Game: Cooperation and Competition

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This research explores factors that influence players' we-intention in first-person shooting (FPS) games. We-intention reflects one's perception of a task in the perspective of groups. Specifically, FPS as a multiplayer online games requires team efforts and interdependence between two or among more players. Therefore, the intention for continue playing is no longer one's personal decision. In order to understand the causes and consequences of we-intention in FPS games, this research draws on the perspectives of cooperation and competition, with spatial presence as the moderating variable. A research model was developed and empirically examined with 165 contributors from popular Facebook gaming communities in Taiwan. Data from the online survey was analyzed and results show that group cohesion is positively associated with we-intention for continue playing FPS game, and that social identity is positively associated with we-intention. In contrast, influences of team goal commitment and situational competitiveness on we-intention, and the moderating effects of social identity was not supported.

References

  1. Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A. 1988. Comments on the Motivational Status of Self-esteem in Social Identity and Intergroup Discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 317--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Anderson C. A., and Carnagey, N. N. 2009. Causal Effects of Violent Sports Video Games on Aggression: Is it Competitiveness or Violent Content? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 731--739.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Aube C., and Rousseau, V. 2005. Team Goal Commitment and Team Effectiveness: The Role of Task Interdependence and Supportive Behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 9(3), 189--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bagozzi, R. P. 2007. The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bagozzi, R. P., Bergami, M., Marzocchi, G. L., and Morandin, G. 2012. Customer--organization Relationships: Development and Test of a Theory of Extended Identities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 63--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., and Dholakia, U. M. 2002. Intentional Social Action in Virtual Communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 2--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., and Dholakia, U. M. 2006. Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups. Management Science, 52(7), 1099--1115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bagozzi, R. P., and Lee, K. H. 2002. Multiple Routes for Social Influence: The Role of Compliance, Internalization and Social Identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(3), 226--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. 1988. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Rubió, I., Quero, S., García-Palacios, A., and Alcañiz, M. L. 2008. Presence and Emotions in Virtual Environments: The Influence of Stereoscopy. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11(1), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bessière, K., Seay, A., and Kiesler, S. 2007. The Ideal Elf: Identity Exploration in World of Warcraft. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 530--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Burke, K., Aytes K., and Chidambaram, L. 2001. Media Effects on the Development of Cohesion and Process Satisfaction in Computer-supported Workgroups-An Analysis of Results from two Longitudinal Studies. Information Technology and People, 14(2), 122--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Carron, A., Widmeyer, W. N., and Brawley, L. 1985. The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. The Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cheung, C. M. K., and Lee, M. K. O. 2010. A Theoretical Model of Intentional Social Action in Online Social Networks. Decision Support Systems, 49, 24--30 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Chung, N., Han H., and Koo, C. 2015. Adoption of Travel Information in User-generated Content on Social Media: The Moderating Effect of Social Presence. Behaviour and Information Technology, 34(9), 902--919. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi R. P., and Pearo, L. K. 2004. A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network and Small-group-based Virtual Communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241--263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. de Oliveira, M. J., and Huertas, M. K. Z. 2015. Does Life Satisfaction Influence the Intention (We-intention) to Use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 205--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Entertainment Software Association (2016). Game Player Data. Retrieved from http://www.theesa.com/facts/gamer_data.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., and Ouwerkerk, J. W. 1999. Self-categorisation, Commitment to the Group and Group self-esteem as Related but Distinct Aspects of Social Identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2-3), 371--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Frederick-Recascino, C. M., and Schuster-Smith, H. 2003. Competition and Intrinsic Motivation in Physical Activity: A comparison of Two Groups. Journal of Sport Behavior. 26(3), 240--254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Graziano, W. G., Hair E. C., and Finch, J. F. 1997. Competitiveness Mediates the Link Between Personality and Group Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1394--1408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (Ed.). 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hartmann, T., Wirth, W., Schramm, H., Klimmt, C., Vorderer, P., Gysbers, A., Böcking, S., Ravaja, N., Laarni, J., Saari, T., Gouvela, F., and Sacau, A. M. 2015. The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES): A Short Self-report Measure for Diverse Media Settings. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(1), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Harman, H. H. 1976. Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hertel, G., Niedner, S., and Herrmann, S. 2003. Motivation of Software Developers in Open Source Projects: An Internet-based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel. Research Policy, 32(7), 1159--1177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Hunton, J. E., Arnold, V., and Gibson, D. 2001. Collective User Participation: A Catalyst for Group Cohesion and Perceived Respect. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2(1), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Hunton, J. E., and Gibson, D. 1999. Soliciting User-input During the Development of an Accounting Information System: Investigating the Efficacy of Group Discussion. Accounting Organizations and Society, 24(7), 597--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Janz, B. D. 1999. Self-directed Teams in IS: Correlates for Improved Systems Development Work Outcomes. Information and Management, 35(3), 171--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., and Walton, A. 2008. Measuring and Defining the Experience of Immersion in Games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(9), 641--661. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jiang, C., Zhao, W., Sun, X, Zhang, K, Zheng, R., and Qu, W. 2016. The Effects of the Self and Social Identity on the Intention to Microblog: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 754--759. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Keyton, J. 2000. Introduction: The relational side of groups. Small Group Research 31(4), 387--396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wright, P. M., and Deshon, R. P. 2001. The Assessment of Goal Commitment: A Measurement Model Metaanalysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(1), 32--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Lee, J. 2009. A Study on Factors to Affect Reuse Intention and Conversion Intention by Evaluation After Game Use - with Two FPS Games as a Main Consideration -. Journal of Korea Game Society, 9(6), 69--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu, Y. 2002. What does Research Say About the Nature of Computer-mediated Communication: Task-oriented, Social-emotion-oriented, or Both. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 6(1), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu, J., and Wei, Z. 2017. Network, Popularity and Social Cohesion: A Game-theoretic Approach. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. 1997. At the Heart of it all: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Grabe, M. E., Bracken, C. C., and Ditton, T. B. 2000. Presence and Television: The Role of Screen Size. Human Communication Research 26(1), 75--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Marker, A. M., and Staiano, A. E. 2015. Better Together: Outcomes of Cooperation Versus Competition in Social Exergaming. Games for Health Journal, 4(1), 25--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. McGrath, J., E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Morschheuser, B., Riar, M., Hamari, J., and Maedche, A. 2017. How Games Induce Cooperation? A Study on the Relationship Between Game Features and We-intentions in an Augmented Reality Game. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 169--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Mulligan, J., Patrovsky, B., and Koster, R. (2003). Developing Online Games: An Insider's Guide. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Nelson, L. D., and Norton, M. I. 2005. From Student to Superhero: Situational Primes Shape Future Helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 423--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Newzoo. 2019a. Most Popular Core PC Games | Global. Retrieved from https://newzoo.com/insights/rankings/top-20-core-pc-games/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Newzoo. 2019b. Zooming In on the Biggest Franchises in Esports: 71% of Fans Watch Only One Game. Retrieved from https://newzoo.com/insights/articles/zooming-in-on-the-biggest-franchises-in-esports-71-of-fans-watch-only-one-game/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Peng, W., and Hsieh, G. 2012. The Influence of Competition, Cooperation, and Player Relationship in a Motor Performance Centered Computer Game. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2100--2106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Piper, W., Marrache, M., Lacroix, R., Richardsen, A., and Jones, B. 1983. Cohesion as a Basic Bond in Groups. Human Relations, 36(2), 93--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Pitta, D. A., and Fowler, D. C. 2005. Internet Community Forums: An Untapped Resource for Consumer Marketers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(5), 265--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Plass, J. K., O'Keefe, P. A., Homer, B. D., Case, J., Hayward, E. O., Stein, M. M., and Perlin, K. 2013. The Impact of Individual, Competitive, and Collaborative Mathematics Game Play on Learning, Performance, and Motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Prapavessis, H., and Carron, A. V. 1997. Sacrifice, cohesion, and conformity to norms in sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(3), 231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Ravaja, N., Salminen, M., Holopainen, J., Saari, T., Laarni, J., and Järvinen, A. 2004. Emotional Response Patterns and Sense of Presence During Video Games. In Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '04), 339--347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Salas, E., Bowers, C., and Cannon-Bowers, J. A. 1995. Military Team Research: 10 Years of Progress. Military Psychology, 7(2), 55--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Salazar, J. 2009. Analyzing Social Identity (Re) Production: Identity Liminal Events in MMORPGs. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(3).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Taggar, S. 2002. Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Schubert, T. W. 2009. A New Conception of Spatial Presence: Once Again, with Feeling. Communication Theory, 19(2), 161--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Searle, J. R. 1990. Collective Intentions and Actions. Intentions in Communication, 401--415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Seo, W. J., Green, C., Ko, Y. J., Lee S., and Schenewark, J. 2007. The Effect of Web Cohesion, Web Commitment, and Attitude Toward the Website on Intentions to Use NFL Teams' Websites. Sport Management Review, 10(3), 231--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Sepehr, S., and Head, M. 2018. Understanding the Role of Competition in Video Gameplay Satisfaction. Information and Management, 55(4), 407--421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Shen, X., Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, M. K., and Chen, H. 2009. An Investigation into Contribution I-intention and We-intention in Open Web-based Encyclopedia: Roles of Joint Commitment and Mutual Agreement. Proceeding of the 13th International Conference on Information Systems, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Shen, X., Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, M. K., and Chen, H. 2010. Gender Differences in Intentional Social Action: We-intention to Engage in Social Network-facilitated Team Collaboration. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 152--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Sheridan, T. B. 1992. Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 120--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Song, H., Kim, J., Tenzek, K. E., and Lee, K. M. 2013. The Effects of Competition and Competitiveness Upon Intrinsic Motivation in Exergames. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1702--1708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Steam (2018). Retrieved from https://store.steampowered.com/stats/?l=tchineseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Tajfel, H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. CUP Archive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Tamborini, R., and Skalski, P. 2006. The Role of Presence in the Experience of Electronic Games. Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences, 225--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Tauer, J., and Harackiewicz, J. 2004. The Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86, 849--861.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Tuomela, R. 1995. The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Tuomela, R. 2005. We-intentions Revisited. Philosophical Studies, 125(3), 327--369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Tuomela, R. 2011. Cooperation as joint action. Analyse and Kritik, 33(1), 65--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., and Hartmann, T. 2003. Explaining the Enjoyment of Playing Video games: The role of Competition. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing, (January), 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., and Ritterfeld, U. 2004. Enjoyment: At the Heart of Media Entertainment. Communication Theory, 14, 388--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Velez, J. A., and Ewoldsen, D. R. 2013. Helping Behaviors During Video Game Play. Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications, 25(4), 190--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Wang, K., Lu, H., and Chang, K. 2018. Determinants of We-Intention for Continuance in MMORPG: Social Interaction and Norm Factors. In Proceedings of the 5th Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference (MISNC '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Welch, R. B. 1999. How Can We Determine if the Sense of Presence Affects Task Performance? Presence, 8(5), 574--577. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., and Biocca, H. 2007. A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences. Media Psychology, 9(3), 493--525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Witmer, B. G., Jerome, C. J., and Singer, M. J. 2005. The Factor Structure of the Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(3), 298--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Wright, T., Boria, E., and Breidenbach, P. 2002. Creative Player Actions in FPS Online Video Games - Playing Counter-Strike. Game Studies, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Yang, X., Tong, Y., and Teo, H. H. 2015. Fostering Fast-response Spontaneous Virtual Team: Effects of Member Skill Awareness and Shared Governance on Team Cohesion and Outcomes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(11), 919.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Yee, N. 2006. Motivations for Play in Online Games. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9(6), 772--775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Determinants of We-intention for Continue Playing FPS Game: Cooperation and Competition

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MISNC2020&IEMT2020: Proceedings of the 7th Multidisciplinary in International Social Networks Conference and The 3rd International Conference on Economics, Management and Technology
        October 2020
        178 pages
        ISBN:9781450389457
        DOI:10.1145/3429395

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 December 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate57of97submissions,59%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader