Lee-Wen Yang
- DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor Independence, Low Balling, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 3(2), 113-127.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Berle, A. and Means, G. C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Indiana Law Journal. 8(8), 514-516.Google Scholar
- Jensen, M. C. and Meekling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3, 305-360.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DeFond, M. and Jiambalvo, J. 1994. Debt Covenant Violations and Manipulation of Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 17, 145-176.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Francis, J. and Krishnan, J. 1999. Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research. 16, 135-165.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., and Nelson, K. K. 2002. The relation between auditors’ fee for nonaudit services and earning management. The Accounting Review. 77, 71-105.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Warfield, T. D., Wild, J. J., and Wild, K. L. 1995. Managerial Ownership, Accounting Choices, and Informativeness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 20, 61-92.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lys, T. and Watts, R.1994. Lawsuits against Auditors. Journal of Accounting Research. 32, 65-102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Duke, J. C. and Hunt III, G. 1990. An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 12 (1-3), 45-63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Press, E. G. and Weintrop, J. B.1990. Accounting-based constraints in public and private debt agreements: Their association with leverage and impact on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 12 (1-3), 65-95.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DeAngelo, H. L., DeAngelo, L., and D. J. Skinner (1994). Accounting choice in troubled companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 17, 113-144.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., and Sweeney, A. P. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review. 70, 193-226.Google Scholar
- Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., and Subramanyam, K. R. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research. 15, 1-24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., and Young, S. 2001. Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 32(7-8), 1311-1346.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., and Sweeney, A. P. 1996. Causes and consequences of earning manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 1-36.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Do Characteristics of Audit Firm Affect Timeliness of Audit Report? Empirical Evidence from China
BCGIN '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Second International Conference on Business Computing and Global InformatizationThis study's mainly purpose is to investigate whether characteristics of audit firm can affect timeliness of audit report base on empirical evidence from stock market of China. The characteristics we think that may have significant effects on timeliness ...
Comments