skip to main content
10.1145/3429551.3429570acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicibeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Comparative Study on the Use of Automation in a Shoe Manufacturing Warehousing with Conventional Warehousing

Published:10 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study aims to compare conventional warehouse practice with the use of an in house developed warehousing application used by a local shoe manufacturing company in the Philippines. Shelf management, inbound and outbound operations were the operation that has been improved by implementing the use of QR code scanning in the application. A comparative study was conducted to analyze and evaluate the current operation compared with the use of the application. The traditional warehousing operation shows that many processes that involve personnel to make decision and actions that can lead to human error that can contribute to decreasing the warehouse's operational effectiveness. The comparison shows unnecessary operations were eliminated after the use of the warehouse application thus it reduces manpower needed to manage the warehouse and it eliminated paper records that can lead to encoding wrong information in the ERP system.

References

  1. Bartholdi, J. J., & Hackman, S. T. (2019). WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION SCIENCE. Retrieved August 01, 2020, from https://www.warehouse-science.com/book/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bukhari, S. A. (2011). What is a Comparative Study? SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1962328Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bubb, H. (2005). Human reliability: A key to improved quality in manufacturing. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing,15 (4), 353-368. DOI:10.1002/hfm.20032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chouhan, N., Vig, H., & Desmukh, R. (2020, April). Footwear Market Size, Share & Growth: Research Report 2027. Retrieved July 29, 2020, from https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/footwear-marketGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Grosse, E. H., Glock, C. H., Jaber, M. Y., & Neumann, W. P. (2014). Incorporating human factors in order picking planning models: Framework and research opportunities. International Journal of Production Research, 53(3), 695-717. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2014.919424Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hambrick, J., & Broadwater, R. (2011). Advantages of Integrated System Model-Based Control for Electrical Distribution System Automation. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 44(1), 6117-6120. DOI:10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.01739Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kokemuller, N. (2016, October 26). Disadvantages of High Inventory Levels. Retrieved August 01, 2020, from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/disadvantages-high-inventory-levels-20400.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lyne, A., & Lyne, M. (2011, July 18). What Is A QR Code And Why Do You Need One? Retrieved August 01, 2020, from https://searchengineland.com/what-is-a-qr-code-and-why-do-you-need-one-27588Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. O'Connor, T. F., Yu, L. X., & Lee, S. L. (2016). Emerging technology: A key enabler for modernizing pharmaceutical manufacturing and advancing product quality. International Journal of Pharmaceutics,509 (1-2), 492-498. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.058Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Wang, Y., Ding, Y., Chen, G., & Jin, S. (2019). Human reliability analysis and optimization of manufacturing systems through Bayesian networks and human factors experiments: A case study in a flexible intermediate bulk container manufacturing plant. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 72, 241-251. DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2019.05.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wu, P., Low, S. P., & Jin, X. (2013). Identification of non-value adding (NVA) activities in precast concrete installation sites to achieve low-carbon installation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 81, 60-70. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.09.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIBE '20: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering
    September 2020
    235 pages
    ISBN:9781450387880
    DOI:10.1145/3429551

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 10 December 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format