skip to main content
10.1145/3429630.3429650acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Promoting Sustainable Development Education through Competency-based Education Supported by Online Resources

Published:28 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a case study on integrating sustainable development (SD) into a Bachelor's degree curriculum. The research is being conducted at Tecnologico de Monterrey (TEC), Mexico, where the lead author is Professor. TEC is one of the world's largest universities, with 26 campuses nationwide and more than 91,000 students. A case study was developed to investigate curriculum interventions, utilizing surveys to students to gather data on their responses to the development of sustainability competencies, an approach that promotes higher order skills in the students. Responses are explored through comparing the semesters in which Sustainability contents and assessment criteria were added to the curriculum. The results reveal that the students recognized significant advances in their recognition and development of sustainability competencies as a result of these interventions. An Online Space has been created as part of the project in order to develop an incremental learning on SD, to share the results for the current study with the community of practice (professors and students) and to establish the means for continuing to disseminate and debate pedagogical developments within the field of SD. The paper concludes by proposing that the findings of the study indicate that this pedagogical approach has the potential to contribute significantly to sustainable development education (SDE).

References

  1. Garza, D. 2019. Challenged to rise, The Latin America University Rankings, Times Higher Education site. Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., Loeblein, P., & Perkins, K. K. 2010. Teaching Physics Using PhET Simulations”. The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225–227. http://doi:10.1119/1.3361987Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jang, H., Lasry, N., Miller, K., & Mazur, E. 2017. Collaborative exams: Cheating? Or learning? American Journal of Physics, 85(3), 223–227. http://doi:10.1119/1.4974744Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kolb. D., Boyatzis. R., Mainemelis, Ch.1999. Experiential Learning Theory: Previous Research and New Directions. Weatherhead School of Management. Case Western Reserve UniversityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dewey. J. 1991 / 1938. Logic. The theory of inquiry. The Later works of John Dewey Vol. 12 Edited by Jo Ann Boydston (Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mezirow, J. 1990. How Critical Reflection triggers Transformative Learning’ Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood, A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning Critical Reflection, San Francisco, United States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Miettinen, R. 2000. The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’ s theory of reflective thought and action’ International Journal of lifelong education, Vol. 19, No. 1. 54± 72. University of Helsinki, FinlandGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Passarelli, A.M., Kolb, D.A. 2012. The Learning Way: Learning from Experience as the Path to Lifelong Learning and Development, (Book Chapter). The Oxford Handbook of Lifelong Learning. Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United StatesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. UNESCO, Education for Sustainable Development. 2018. [Online] Extracted from: https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development [29/12/2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pascal F. and Stanszus L. 2019. Transforming Consumer Behavior: Introducing Self-Inquiry-Based and Self-Experience-Based Learning for Building Personal Competencies for Sustainable Consumption. Sustainability 11(9), 2550; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092550Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Abdel, E. and Collins, M. 2017. Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching, Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Vol. 8, pp. 229-241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Demssieab, Y., Wesselinka R., Biemansa, J.,, Muldera, M., 2019. Think outside the European box: Identifying sustainability competencies for a base of the pyramid context https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.255Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tecnologico de Monterrey, 2018. Modelo de evaluación del aprendizaje, (Folleto Morado). p. 7 – 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Núñez, M.E., Rojas-López J.C. and Rodríguez-Paz, M. 2019. Real-time distance courses to improve satisfaction and competence - A case study on the performance of students observing their grades. Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference EDUCON 2019, p. 549-555, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Nuñez, M. E. and Rojas J.C. 2018. Real-time distance courses to improve satisfaction and competence: A case study of international professors and local students. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE). https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-86877Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nuñez, M.E. 2019. Integrating Sustainable Development into the Curriculum - A case study on the developing of Sustainability competencies in Industrial Design students at a Bachelor level in Mexico. International Higher Education Teaching and Learning Education, UK. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000018022Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Emblen-Perry 2019. Can sustainability audits provide effective, hands-on business sustainability learning, teaching and assessment for business management undergraduates? Worcester Business School, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2018-0181Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICDTE '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education
    September 2020
    97 pages
    ISBN:9781450388528
    DOI:10.1145/3429630

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format