skip to main content
10.1145/3429789.3429843acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconetsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Usability Evaluation of "Inventory Information System" Design of Disaster Management in Yogyakarta Province - Indonesia

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

"Inventory Management System" is a website-based information system for disaster relief goods inventory designed for the Sleman Regency Regional Disaster Management Agency. Usability interface measurement has not been done when designing the information system. The usability interface is a quality attribute that is used to evaluate the convenience of people in obtaining information on a product, system, or service. This study aims to measure the usability of the existing website design interface and compare the usability value with the improved website design interface. Heuristic evaluation and usability testing methods are used to determine the usability interface design, both before and after repair. The results show that there were 18 problems found by evaluators. After interface improvements, the level of efficiency, effectiveness, satisfaction on all tasks, and usability values based on web-use have increased.

References

  1. Lawrence, B. (2012). Ring of Fire: Indonesia dalam Lingkaran Api. Jakarta: Ufuk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kovacs, G., & Spens, K. (2007). Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 99--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., & Tullis, T. (2012). Designing Noticeable Bricklets by Tracking User's Eye Movements. Hawaii International Conference on IEEE, pp. 525--532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ISO 9241:11. 2018. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. Retrieved from http://iso.org accessed on 13 April 2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Holzinger, A. (2005). Usability Engineering Methods for Software Developers. Communication of The ACM, pp. 71--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nielsen, J. (1994, November 1). How to Conduct a Heuristic Evaluation Retrieved from NN/g Nielsen Norman Group: http://www.nngroup.com accessed on 15 April 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Penha, M., Correia, W. F., Campos, F. F., & Barros, M. d. (2014). Heuristic Evaluation of Usability - A Case Study with The Learning Management System (LMS) of IFPE. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 295--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiew, T. K., & Salim, S. S. (2003). WEBUSE: Website Usability Evaluation Tool. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 47--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mazumder, F. K., & Das, U. K. (2014). Usability Guidelines for Usable User Interface. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 9, pp. 79--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Nielsen, J. (2012, January 2). Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. Retrieved from NN/g Nielsen Norman Group: http://nngroup.com accessed on 15 April 2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nielsen, J. (1994, November 1). Summary of Usability Inspection Methods. Retrieved from NN/g Nielsen Norman Group: http://www.nngroup.com accessed on 15 April 2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. California: Morgan KaufmannGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nielsen, J. (2006, June 26). Quantitative Studies: How Many users to Test. Retrieved from NN/g Nielse Norman Group: http://www.nngroup.com accessed on 15 April 2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, D. R., & Chindler, P. S. (2006). Business Research Method 9th Edition. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ahmed, S. Z. (2008). A Comparison of Usability Techniques for Evaluating Information Retrieval System Interfaces. Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 48--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bevan, N. (2009). International Standards for Usability Should Be More Widely Used. Journal of Usability, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 106--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D., & Beale, R. (2004). Human Computer Interaction 3rd Edition. London: Pearson Education Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Few, S. (2006). Information Dashboard Design. Italy: O'Reilly Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Satzinger, J. W., Jackson, R. B., & Burd, S. D. (2012). Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World (6th ed.). Boston: Joe Sabatino.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research 2nd Edition. United States: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Usability Evaluation of "Inventory Information System" Design of Disaster Management in Yogyakarta Province - Indonesia

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICONETSI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Engineering and Information Technology for Sustainable Industry
      September 2020
      466 pages
      ISBN:9781450387712
      DOI:10.1145/3429789

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 November 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader