skip to main content
10.1145/3429789.3429853acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconetsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Beyond Socio-Technical Innovation: Lesson Learned from Jatropha Fuel Development in Indonesia

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper focuses on a socio-technical innovation of Jatropha development in Grobogan district, Indonesia. The aim of this study is to understand that despite technical feasibility, financial support from the government and private sector involvement, Jatropha-based fuel development in the area failed to survive. The analysis is performed via combining functions of innovation system, which focuses on the presence of entrepreneur, knowledge diffusion, legitimacy and market and Strategic Niche Management, which focuses on learning, networking, and articulating expectation. The result of this study shows that an innovation design of Jatropha development was able to travel from the engineers' laboratory work, the policy makers' offices into the farmers' land through continuous adjustments of adding new policies, introducing new business model in a limited time. Analysis of this paper suggests that biofuel development, Jatropha in particular, can only be survive either through innovation, of continuously adjusting the design and implementation or through embedding it to the existing market. The Grobogan case shows that Jatropha development failed to survive due to the absence of both possibilities.

References

  1. Republic of Indonesia, "Indonesia: First Nationally Determined Contribution," no. November, p. 18, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Tacconi and M. Z. Muttaqin, "Reducing emissions from land use change in Indonesia: An overview," For. Policy Econ., vol. 108, no. July, p. 101979, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. J. Groom, E. M. Gray, and P. A. Townsend, "Biofuels and biodiversity: Principles for creating better policies for biofuel production," Conserv. Biol., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 602--609, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. W. Jaung et al., "Spatial assessment of degraded lands for biofuel production in Indonesia," Sustain., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1--17, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. H. Baral, "Potential of bioenergy production from degraded ( peat ) lands in Indonesia," no. June, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Ahmed, B. B. Campion, and A. Gasparatos, "Biofuel development in Ghana: policies of expansion and drivers of failure in the jatropha sector," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 70, no. November 2016, pp. 133--149, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y. A. Fatimah, "Fantasy, values, and identity in biofuel innovation: Examining the promise of Jatropha for Indonesia," Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 108--116, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. P. Hekkert, R. A. A. Suurs, S. O. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R. E. H. M. Smits, "Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 413--432, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. O. Negro, M. P. Hekkert, and R. E. Smits, "Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion-A functional analysis," Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 925--938, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. H. E. Edsand, "Identifying barriers to wind energy diffusion in Colombia: A function analysis of the technological innovation system and the wider context," Technol. Soc., vol. 49, pp. 1--15, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. Kemp, J. Schot, and R. Hoogma, "Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management," Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 175--198, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Schot and F. W. Geels, "Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy," Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 537--554, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Strauss and J. Corbin, "Grounded theory methodology," Handb. Qual. Res., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 273--285, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Walker and F. Myrick, "Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure," Qual. Health Res., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 547--559, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Rip and R. Kemp, "Chapter 6 Technological change," Hum. Choice Clim. Chang., 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Smith and R. Raven, "What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability," Res. Policy, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1025--1036, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. F. W. Geels, "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study," Res. Policy, vol. 31, no. 8--9, pp. 1257--1274, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. N. E. J. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. MIT press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Callon, Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. Routledge, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Beaton and L. Lontoh, "Lessons Learned from Indonesia's Attempts to Reform Fossil-fuel Subsidies," Int. Inst. Sustain. Dev., no. October, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. H. S. Dillon, T. Laan, and H. S. Dillon, Government Support for Ethanol and Biodiesel in Indonesia, no. December. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. F. A. Envest, "Feasability Study Development of Jatropha Curcas Oil for Bio-energy in Rural Areas," Indones. Jakarta, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. B. B. N. Timnas, "Bahan Bakar Nabati: Bahan Bakar Alternatif dari Tumbuhan sebagai Pengganti Minyak Bumi dan Gas," Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. E. Beerkens, "Centres of excellence and relevance: The contextualisation of global models," Sci. Technol. Soc., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 153--175, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. S. Yuliar, I. Nurlaila, and S. Amir, "Cultivating energy, reducing poverty: biofuel development in an Indonesian village," Perspect. Glob. Dev. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 113--132, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. D. C. Korten, "Community organization and rural development: A learning process approach," Public Adm. Rev., pp. 480--511, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D. Mosse, "Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice," Dev. Change, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 639--671, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Beyond Socio-Technical Innovation: Lesson Learned from Jatropha Fuel Development in Indonesia

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICONETSI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Engineering and Information Technology for Sustainable Industry
      September 2020
      466 pages
      ISBN:9781450387712
      DOI:10.1145/3429789

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 November 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader