skip to main content
10.1145/3430116.3430117acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictrsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Role of Space Weather in Determining the State of the Ionosphere

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The influence of space weather on the state of the ionosphere is most pronounced during disturbances. In the present paper, this effect is estimated from changes of the total electron content TEC and the critical frequency foF2. For the study, March 2012 was selected, which includes two periods: March 7-17 and March 21-31. The first period includes four strong magnetic storms and is well documented in the literature in terms of the behavior of solar and geomagnetic parameters. The second period is characterized by an increase in TEC over almost the entire period. Latitudinal variations of TEC in the range 30° - 80° N near the meridian of 15° E and their correlation coefficients with solar and geomagnetic parameters are obtained. Using vertical sounding data (foF2) for four European stations near the selected meridian, the latitudinal dependence of the equivalent slab thickness of the ionosphere was constructed over the entire range. This dependence made it possible to obtain the latitudinal response of the frequency foF2 on disturbances and to reveal features such as the transition from the zone of negative disturbances at high latitudes to positive disturbances at low latitudes in the first period, daily excess over the median in the second period. This response was compared with frequency behavior for the International Reference Ionosphere model IRI. It was shown that the IRI model does not adequately reflect the variation of foF2 during disturbances, however, an assessment of the latitudinal dependence of the accuracy of the model, when compared with the median, showed that the model provides results for the high-latitude region at level of the middle-latitude values with a decrease in accuracy with decreasing latitude.

References

  1. Dieter Bilitza, David Altadill, Vladimir Truhlik, Valentin Shubin, Ivan Galkin, Bodo Reinisch and Xueqin Huang, 2017. International Reference Ionosphere 2016: From ionospheric climate to real-time weather predictions, Space Weather, 15, 418--429. DOI:10.1002/2016SW001593.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruce T. Tsurutani, Ezequiel Echer, Kazunari Shibata, Olga P. Verkhoglyadova, Anthony J. Mannucci, Walter D. Gonzalez, Janet U. Kozyra and Martin Patzold, 2014. The interplanetary causes of geomagnetic activity during the 7-17 March 2012 interval: a CAWSES II overview, Journal of Space Weather Space Climate, 4, A02, 1--8. DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2013056.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Anna Belehaki, Ivan Kutiev, Pencho Marinov, Ioanna Tsagouri, Kostas Koutroumbas and Panagiotis Elias, 2017. Ionospheric electron density perturbations during the 7-10 March 2012 geomagnetic storm period, Advances in Space Research, 59, 1041--1056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.11.031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Olga P. Verkhoglyadova, Bruce T. Tsurutani, Anthony J. Mannucci, Martin G. Mlynczak, Linda A. Hunt and Larry J. Paxton, 2014. Ionospheric TEC, thermospheric cooling and Σ[O/N2] compositional changes during the 6-17 March 2012 magnetic storm interval (CAWSES II), Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 115--116, 41 -51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2013.11.009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Veneta Guineva, Irina V. Despirak and Boris V. Kozelov, 2016. Substorms observations during two strongly disturbed periods - in March 2012 and March 2015, Sun and Geosphere, 11(2), 101--105. ISSN 1819-0839.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fasgibe Tesema, Baylie Damtie and Melessew Nigussie, 2015. The response of the ionosphere to intense geomagnetic storms in 2012 using GPS-TEC data from East Africa longitudinal sector, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 135, 143--151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.10.021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Olga A. Maltseva and Tatyana V. Nikitenko, 2020. The effect of space weather on the ionosphere at the 15° meridian during CAWSES-II, In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 862(2), paper N° 022067, 1--6. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/862/2/022067.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiaping Lan, Baiqi Ning, Guozhu Li, Zhengping Zhu, Lianhuan Hu and Wenjie Sun, 2018. Observation of short-period ionospheric disturbances using a portable digital ionosonde at Sanya, Radio Science, 53, 1521 -- 1532. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RS006699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. David Themens, Thuyyil Jayachandran, Ivan Galkin and Chris Hall, 2017. The Empirical Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Model (E-CHAIM): NmF2 and hmF2, Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics, 122, 9015 -- 9031. https://doi:10.1002/2017JA024398.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Olga Maltseva, 2019. Choice of a Model of the Ionosphere to Use in High Latitudes, In ICTRS'19, September 16-17, 2019, Rhodes, Greece ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-7669-3/19/09, 5--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357767.3357768. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. John M. Goodman, 2005. Operational communication systems and relationships to the ionosphere and space weather, Advances in Space Research, 36, 2241--2252. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2003.05.063.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Role of Space Weather in Determining the State of the Ionosphere

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICTRS 2020: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Telecommunications and Remote Sensing
      October 2020
      50 pages
      ISBN:9781450377300
      DOI:10.1145/3430116

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 November 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ICTRS 2020 Paper Acceptance Rate7of15submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate7of15submissions,47%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader