research-article

Scaling Data Physicalization – How Does Size Influence Experience?

Authors:

Irene López García,

Eva HorneckerAuthors Info & Claims

TEI '21: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Article No.: 8, Pages 1 - 14

https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440627

Published: 14 February 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Given the material nature of data physicalization, their creators need to make many design decisions, including material choices and scale. Our study explores the impact of scale in physicalization, motivated by the assumption that size can affect user experience. We created two different physicalizations (for the same dataset) in three sizes each, and evaluated the resulting six objects with a questionnaire approach and interviews. Our findings highlight that scale needs to be chosen wisely given its impact on representation legibility (ease of viewing and understanding) and affordances for interaction. We discuss factors to take into account when designing large-scale physicalizations and in further research on the potential role of scale in physicalizaton. In particular, we argue that for large-scale physicalizations, scale should matter and communicate meaning, for instance, supporting an intuitive understanding of magnitudes, or a specific experience. Thus, scale needs to be an explicit design decision, that interacts with other design parameters.

References

[1]

Andre G. Afonso, Ecem Ergin, and Ava Fatah gen. Schieck. 2019. Flowing Bodies: Exploring the Micro and Macro Scales of Bodily Interactions with Urban Media Installations. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1183–1193. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322378

Digital Library

[2]

Jason Alexander, Anne Roudaut, Jürgen Steimle, Kasper Hornbæk, Miguel Bruns Alonso, Sean Follmer, and Timothy Merritt. 2018. Grand Challenges in Shape-Changing Interface Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173873

Digital Library

[3]

Christopher Andrews, Alex Endert, and Chris North. 2010. Space to Think: Large High-Resolution Displays for Sensemaking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753336

Digital Library

[4]

Karl Aspelund. 2014. The principles of design: Proportion and scale. In Designing: an introduction. Fairchild Books, Bloomsbury, UK, 108–111.

[5]

AttrakDiff. 2019. Assessment. Retrieved March 9, 2019 from https://esurvey.uid.com/project#!login

[6]

Robert Ball, Chris North, and Doug A. Bowman. 2007. Move to Improve: Promoting Physical Navigation to Increase User Performance with Large Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240656

Digital Library

[7]

Stephen Barrass. 2014. Acoustic Sonification of Blood Pressure in the Form of a Singing Bowl. In SoniHED – Conference on Sonification of Health and Environmental Data, Vol. 12. York, UK, 6.

[8]

Stan’s Café. [n.d.]. Of All The People In All The World. Retrieved December 12, 2019 from http://www.stanscafe.co.uk/project-of-all-the-people.html See also http://dataphys.org/list/of-all-the-people-in-all-the-world-stats-with-rice/.

[9]

Sandy Claes and Andrew Vande Moere. 2015. The Role of Tangible Interaction in Exploring Information on Public Visualization Displays. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757733

Digital Library

[10]

Marcelo Coelho and Jamie Zigelbaum. 2011. Shape-Changing Interfaces. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 15, 2 (Feb. 2011), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0311-y

Digital Library

[11]

Paul Cummins. 2014. Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red. Retrieved December 13, 2019 from https://www.paulcumminsceramics.com/blood-swept/

[12]

Schloss Dagstuhl. 2018. Dagstuhl seminar on Data Physicalization: October 28 - November 2, 2018. Retrieved August 22, 2018 from https://www.dagstuhl.de/en/program/calendar/semhp/?semnr=18441

[13]

Pierre Dragicevic, Yvonne Jansen, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2019. Data Physicalization. In Springer Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, Jean Vanderdonckt (Ed.). Springer.

[14]

Nick Dulake and Ian Gwilt. 2017. Flying with data: Openness, forms and understanding.The Design Journal 20 (7 2017), S3863–S3872. Issue sup1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352889

[15]

Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. InFORM: Dynamic Physical Affordances and Constraints through Shape and Object Actuation. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom) (UIST ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502032

Digital Library

[16]

User Interface Design GmbH. 2013. AttrakDiff. Retrieved December 14, 2019 from http://attrakdiff.de/sience-en.html

[17]

Steve Guest, Jean Marc Dessirier, Anahit Mehrabyan, Francis McGlone, Greg Essick, George Gescheider, Anne Fontana, Rui Xiong, Rochelle Ackerley, and Kevin Blot. 2011. The development and validation of sensory and emotional scales of touch perception. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 73 (2 2011), 531–550. Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0037-y

[18]

Ian Gwilt, Alaster Yoxall, and Koutaro Sano. 2012. Enhancing the understanding of statistical data through the creation of physical objects. In DS 73-1 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC), Volume 1 (Glasgow, UK). the Design Society, 117–126. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/32468

[19]

Marc Hassenzahl. 2004. The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products. Human-Computer Interaction 19 (12 2004), 319–349. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2

Digital Library

[20]

William R. Hazlewood, Nick Dalton, Paul Marshall, Yvonne Rogers, and Susanna Hertrich. 2010. Bricolage and Consultation: Addressing New Design Challenges When Building Large-Scale Installations. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858244

Digital Library

[21]

Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale, Alice Thudt, Anthony Tang, and Michael Mauerer. 2014. Constructive Visualization. In Proceedings of the 2014 SIGCHI Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598566

Digital Library

[22]

Mikkel R Jakobsen, Yvonne Jansen, Sebastian Boring, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Should I Stay or Should I Go? Selecting Between Touch and Mid-Air Gestures for Large-Display Interaction. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler(Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22698-9_31

Digital Library

[23]

Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2013. Evaluating the Efficiency of Physical Visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2593–2602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481359

Digital Library

[24]

Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, Johan Kildal, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3227–3236. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702180

Digital Library

[25]

Yvonne Jansen and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. A Psychophysical Investigation of Size as a Physical Variable. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22 (2016), 479–488. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467951

Digital Library

[26]

Andrea Jelić, Gaetano Tieri, Federico De Matteis, Fabio Babiloni, and Giovanni Vecchiato. 2016. The enactive approach to architectural experience: A neurophysiological perspective on embodiment, motivation, and affordances. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016), 481. Issue MAR. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00481

[27]

Rohit Ashok Khot, Larissa Hjorth, and Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller. 2014. Understanding Physical Activity Through 3D Printed Material Artifacts. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3835–3844. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557144

Digital Library

[28]

Susan J. Lederman and Roberta L. Klatzky. 1987. Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition.Cognitive psychology 19 (7 1987), 342–68. Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90008-9

[29]

Sang-su Lee, Youn-kyung Lim, and Kun-Pyo Lee. 2012. Exploring the Effects of Size on Deformable User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Companion (San Francisco, California, USA) (MobileHCI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/2371664.2371682

Digital Library

[30]

Minn_Lab. 2017. Orbacles. Retrieved November 29, 2019 from http://minnlab.squarespace.com/orbacles/

[31]

Andrew Vande Moere. 2008. Beyond the Tyranny of the Pixel: Exploring the Physicality of Information Visualization. In 2008 12th International Conference Information Visualisation. IEEE, London, UK, 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2008.84

Digital Library

[32]

Andrew Vande Moere and Sandy Claes. 2015. Towards Recognizing the Tacit Qualities of Physical Data Visualization. Workshop on Exploring the Challenges of Making Data Physical, co-located with CHI’15.

[33]

Fatemeh Moradi, Mikael Wiberg, and Mikael Hansson. 2018. Scaling Interaction—: From Small-Scale Interaction to Architectural Scale. ACM Interactions 25, 6 (Oct. 2018), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274574

Digital Library

[34]

Ken Nakagaki, Luke Vink, Jared Counts, Daniel Windham, Daniel Leithinger, Sean Follmer, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2016. Materiable: Rendering Dynamic Material Properties in Response to Direct Physical Touch with Shape Changing Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2764–2772. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858104

Digital Library

[35]

Juhani Pallasmaa. 2005. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses (2nd. ed. ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

[36]

Stuart L Pimm, Gareth J Russell, John L Gittleman, and Thomas M Brooks. 1995. The Future of Biodiversity. Science 269 (7 1995), 347 LP – 350. Issue 5222. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5222.347

[37]

Biljana Puric. 2016. How Scale in Art Influences the Viewing Experience. Retrieved December 12, 2019 from https://www.widewalls.ch/scale-in-art/

[38]

Majken K. Rasmussen, Esben W. Pedersen, Marianne G. Petersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. Shape-Changing Interfaces: A Review of the Design Space and Open Research Questions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 735–744. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207781

Digital Library

[39]

Abigail Reynolds. 2003. Mount Fear East London. Retrieved December 13, 2019 from http://www.abigailreynolds.com/works/44/mount-fear-east-london/

[40]

Mikkel Rønne Jakobsen and Kasper Hornbæk. 2011. Sizing up Visualizations: Effects of Display Size in Focus+context, Overview+detail, and Zooming Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979156

Digital Library

[41]

Adrien Segal. [n.d.]. Grewingk Glacier. Retrieved December 12, 2019 from https://www.adriensegal.com/grewingk-glacier/

[42]

Orit Shaer and Eva Hornecker. 2009. Tangible User Interfaces: Past, Present, and Future Directions. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 3 (1 2009), 1–137. Issue 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000026

Digital Library

[43]

Simon Stusak, Moritz Hobe, and Andreas Butz. 2016. If Your Mind Can Grasp It, Your Hands Will Help. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839476

Digital Library

[44]

Simon Stusak, Jeannette Schwarz, and Andreas Butz. 2015. Evaluating the Memorability of Physical Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3247–3250. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702248

Digital Library

[45]

Simon Stusak, Aurélien Tabard, Franziska Sauka, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Andreas Butz. 2014. Activity Sculptures: Exploring the Impact of Physical Visualizations on Running Activity. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (Dec 2014), 2201–2210. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2352953

[46]

Faisal Taher, John Hardy, Abhijit Karnik, Christian Weichel, Yvonne Jansen, Kasper Hornbæk, and Jason Alexander. 2015. Exploring Interactions with Physically Dynamic Bar Charts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3237–3246. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702604

Digital Library

[47]

Desney S Tan, Darren Gergle, Peter Scupelli, and Randy Pausch. 2003. With Similar Visual Angles, Larger Displays Improve Spatial Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642650

Digital Library

[48]

Desney S Tan, Randy Pausch, Randy Pausch, Randy Pausch, Jeanine K Stefanucci, Dennis R Proffitt, and Dennis R Proffitt. 2002. Kinesthetic Cues Aid Spatial Memory. In CHI ’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 806–807. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506607

Digital Library

[49]

Christopher Tweed. 2000. A phenomenological framework for describing architectural experience. In Phenomenology and Culture. University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, 1–9. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/95941/

[50]

Björn van der Hoort and H Henrik Ehrsson. 2014. Body ownership affects visual perception of object size by rescaling the visual representation of external space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 76 (2014), 1414–1428. Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0664-9

[51]

Björn van der Hoort, Arvid Guterstam, and H. Henrik Ehrsson. 2011. Being Barbie: The Size of One’s Own Body Determines the Perceived Size of the World. PLoS ONE 6 (5 2011), e20195. Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020195

[52]

Yun Wang, Xiaojuan Ma, Qiong Luo, and Huamin Qu. 2016. Data Edibilization: Representing Data with Food. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892570

Digital Library

[53]

Yun Wang, Adrien Segal, Roberta L. Klatzky, Daniel F. Keefe, Petra Isenberg, Jörn Hurtienne, Eva Hornecker, Tim Dwyer, and Stephen Barrass. 2019. An Emotional Response to the Value of Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 39 (2019), 8–17. Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2019.2923483

Digital Library

[54]

Data Physicalization Wiki. [n.d.]. Data Physicalization. Retrieved August 22, 2018 from http://dataphys.org/

[55]

Wikipedia. [n.d.]. Timeline of extinctions in the Holocene. Retrieved March 19, 2019 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_extinctions_in_the_Holocene

[56]

Wesley Willett, Yvonne Jansen, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2017. Embedded Data Representations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23 (2017), 461–470. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598608

Digital Library

[57]

Nathan Yau. 2013. Data Points: Visualization That Means Something. Wiley.

[58]

Johannes Zagermann, Ulrike Pfeil, Daniel Fink, Philipp von Bauer, and Harald Reiterer. 2017. Memory in Motion: The Influence of Gesture- and Touch-Based Input Modalities on Spatial Memory. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1899–1910. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026001

Digital Library

[59]

Jack Zhao and Andrew Vande Moere. 2008. Embodiment in Data Sculpture: A Model of the Physical Visualization of Information. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1145/1413634.1413696

Digital Library

Cited By

Friedenberger THurtienne J(2025)Size Doesn’t Matter? Down-Scaling a Data Physicalization Does Not Measurably Change Viewers’ Mediated Social InteractionsProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3689050.3704947(1-14)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689050.3704947
Thieme Mvan Koningsbruggen RPotts DHornecker E(2025)AR versus Physical Data Representations: A Comparison of User Engagement and Spatial Exploration PatternsProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3689050.3704946(1-16)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689050.3704946
Mahecha Arango VOvais MYoussef YDas SVan Koningsbruggen RHornecker ECiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)`A Fair Game?': Using Narrative Sensification and Embodied Metaphors for AwarenessProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633375(1-12)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3633375
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Scaling Data Physicalization – How Does Size Influence Experience?
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Enhancing the design process by embedding HCI research into experience triggers
Ergo'IA '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée Conference - Design, Ergonomie et IHM: quelle articulation pour la co-conception de l'interaction

Over the last decade, User Experience (UX) has become a core concept in the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Beyond the fact of understanding and assessing the User Experience derived from the use of interactive systems, practitioners and ...
The construal of experience in HCI

Self-reports are commonly applied in HCI but differ in the aspects of experience which they access.Presents a framework for understanding fundamental differences between retrospective and momentary assessments.Illustrated with examples in health and ...
The experience of interactive storytelling: comparing “fahrenheit” with “façade”
ICEC'11: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Entertainment Computing

At the intersection of multimedia, artificial intelligence, and gaming technology, new visions of future entertainment media arise that approximate the “Holodeck” ® idea of interactive storytelling. We report exploratory experiments on the user ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

TEI '21: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 2021

908 pages

ISBN:9781450382137

DOI:10.1145/3430524

Editor:
Raphael Wimmer
University of Regensburg, Germany
,
General Chairs:
Martin Kaltenbrunner
University of Art and Design Linz, Austria
,
Martin Murer
University of Salzburg, Austria
,
Program Chairs:
Katrin Wolf
Beuth University of Applied Sciences, Berlin, Germany
,
Ian Oakley
UNIST, Ulsan, Republic of Korea

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 February 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

TEI '21

TEI '21: Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

February 14 - 17, 2021

Salzburg, Austria

Acceptance Rates

TEI '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 136 submissions, 29%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

17
Total Citations
View Citations
715
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)125
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Friedenberger THurtienne J(2025)Size Doesn’t Matter? Down-Scaling a Data Physicalization Does Not Measurably Change Viewers’ Mediated Social InteractionsProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3689050.3704947(1-14)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689050.3704947
Thieme Mvan Koningsbruggen RPotts DHornecker E(2025)AR versus Physical Data Representations: A Comparison of User Engagement and Spatial Exploration PatternsProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3689050.3704946(1-16)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689050.3704946
Mahecha Arango VOvais MYoussef YDas SVan Koningsbruggen RHornecker ECiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)`A Fair Game?': Using Narrative Sensification and Embodied Metaphors for AwarenessProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633375(1-12)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3633375
Jones LGrip GKourtoukov BGuljajeva VCanet Sola MNabil SCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)Knitting Interactive Spaces: Fabricating Data Physicalizations of Local Community Visitors with Circular Knitting MachinesProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633359(1-14)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3633359
Van Koningsbruggen RHaliburton LRossmy BGeorge CHornecker EHengeveld BCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)Metaphors and `Tacit' Data: the Role of Metaphors in Data and Physical Data RepresentationsProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633355(1-17)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3633355
Herman BJackson CKeefe D(2024)Touching the Ground: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Data Physicalizations for Spatial Data Analysis TasksIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345637731:1(875-885)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456377
Bae SFujiwara TYnnerman ADo ERivera MSzafir D(2024)A Computational Design Pipeline to Fabricate Sensing Network PhysicalizationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332719830:1(913-923)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327198
Biørn-Hansen ALindrup MEriksson EPargman DLaaksolahti J(2024)Dealing with carbon: physicalisation of academic flying to support collective meaning-making for a low-carbon academiaBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.240836643:14(3371-3388)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2408366
Perera DVerdezoto Dias NLannon SGwilliam JEslambolchilar P(2024)Exploring the design of physical artefacts to visualise household consumption for encouraging sustainable practicesBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.239867343:14(3356-3370)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2398673
Cooper CBuur J(2024)Exploring bike-commuter habits through data physicalisation engagementBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.239643343:14(3340-3355)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2396433
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten