View Based Review Exploration
Pages 218 - 222
Abstract
In an e-commerce site, reviews help augment basic product descriptions with detailed user experiences and opinions on the product. These reviews greatly influence the purchase decisions of oncoming customers. Since these reviews are haphazardly presented, they call for befitting review exploration techniques. We propose a novel view based review exploration system that can be used to control the depth and content of the retrieved reviews. We propose three views depending on the depth personified by them: the Bird-eye view, the Unidirectional view, and the Microscopic view. The views present a ranked list of relevant reviews that meet the view criteria. The proposed view based exploration recorded precision as high as 0.85.
References
[1]
Christy MK Cheung, Matthew KO Lee, and Neil Rabjohn. 2008. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet research 18, 3 (2008), 229–247.
[2]
Prerna Chikersal, Soujanya Poria, and Erik Cambria. 2015. SeNTU: sentiment analysis of tweets by combining a rule-based classifier with supervised learning. In SemEval 2015. 647–651.
[3]
Alton YK Chua and Snehasish Banerjee. 2015. Understanding review helpfulness as a function of reviewer reputation, review rating, and review depth. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, 2(2015), 354–362.
[4]
Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Gueorgi Kossinets, Jon Kleinberg, and Lillian Lee. 2009. How opinions are received by online communities: a case study on amazon. com helpfulness votes. In WWW. ACM, 141–150.
[5]
Günes Erkan and Dragomir R Radev. 2004. Lexrank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of artificial intelligence research 22 (2004), 457–479.
[6]
Xing Fang and Justin Zhan. 2015. Sentiment analysis using product review data. Journal of Big Data 2, 1 (2015), 5.
[7]
Yihong Gong and Xin Liu. 2001. Generic text summarization using relevance measure and latent semantic analysis. In ACM SIGIR. ACM, 19–25.
[8]
Ruining He and Julian McAuley. 2016. Ups and downs: Modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering. In WWW. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 507–517.
[9]
Nitin Jindal and Bing Liu. 2006. Identifying comparative sentences in text documents. In ACM SIGIR. ACM, 244–251.
[10]
Thorsten Joachims. 2006. Training linear SVMs in linear time. In ACM SIGKDD. ACM, 217–226.
[11]
Nikolaos Korfiatis, Elena GarcíA-Bariocanal, and Salvador Sánchez-Alonso. 2012. Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 11, 3(2012), 205–217.
[12]
Nanda Kumar and Izak Benbasat. 2006. Research note: the influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research 17, 4 (2006), 425–439.
[13]
J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics (1977), 363–374.
[14]
Mengwen Liu, Yi Fang, Dae Hoon Park, Xiaohua Hu, and Zhengtao Yu. 2016. Retrieving Non-Redundant Questions to Summarize a Product Review. In ACM SIGIR. ACM, 385–394.
[15]
Yang Liu, Xiangji Huang, Aijun An, and Xiaohui Yu. 2008. Modeling and predicting the helpfulness of online reviews. In ICDM. IEEE, 443–452.
[16]
A Jenifer Jothi Mary and L Arockiam. 2017. ASFuL: Aspect based sentiment summarization using fuzzy logic. In ICAMMAET. IEEE, 1–5.
[17]
Rada Mihalcea and Paul Tarau. 2004. Textrank: Bringing order into text. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 404–411.
[18]
Susan M Mudambi and David Schuff. 2010. What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. (2010).
[19]
Jahna Otterbacher. 2009. ’Helpfulness’ in online communities: a measure of message quality. In SIGCHI. ACM, 955–964.
[20]
Maria Pontiki, Dimitris Galanis, Haris Papageorgiou, Ion Androutsopoulos, Suresh Manandhar, AL-Smadi Mohammad, Mahmoud Al-Ayyoub, Yanyan Zhao, Bing Qin, Orphée De Clercq, 2016. SemEval-2016 task 5: Aspect based sentiment analysis. In SemEval-2016. 19–30.
[21]
Mohammad Salehan and Dan J Kim. 2016. Predicting the performance of online consumer reviews: A sentiment mining approach to big data analytics. Decision Support Systems 81 (2016), 30–40.
[22]
Jiwei Tan, Xiaojun Wan, and Jianguo Xiao. 2015. Learning to Recommend Quotes for Writing. In AAAI. 2453–2459.
[23]
G Vinodhini and RM Chandrasekaran. 2017. A sampling based sentiment mining approach for e-commerce applications. Information Processing & Management 53, 1 (2017), 223–236.
[24]
Tao Wang, Yi Cai, Ho-fung Leung, Raymond YK Lau, Qing Li, and Huaqing Min. 2014. Product aspect extraction supervised with online domain knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems 71 (2014), 86–100.
Recommendations
Active exploration for learning rankings from clickthrough data
KDD '07: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data miningWe address the task of learning rankings of documents from search enginelogs of user behavior. Previous work on this problem has relied onpassively collected clickthrough data. In contrast, we show that anactive exploration strategy can provide data ...
Balancing exploration and exploitation in listwise and pairwise online learning to rank for information retrieval
As retrieval systems become more complex, learning to rank approaches are being developed to automatically tune their parameters. Using online learning to rank, retrieval systems can learn directly from implicit feedback inferred from user interactions. ...
A Model and Framework for Visualization Exploration
Visualization exploration is the process of extracting insight from data via interaction with visual depictions of that data. Visualization exploration is more than presentation; the interaction with both the data and its depiction is as important as ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
January 2021
453 pages
ISBN:9781450388177
DOI:10.1145/3430984
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 02 January 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CODS COMAD 2021
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 197 of 680 submissions, 29%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 41Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)3
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format