skip to main content
10.1145/3431943.3431962acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hybrid Automated Brain Tumor Detection by Using FKM, KFCM Algorithm with Skull Stripping

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Brain tumor detection from MRI images is a time consuming and precarious task due to irregular characteristics of tumor tissue image segmentation. In MR images permit convincing evidence and play a decisive part in diagnosing the different kinds of tumors. The segmentation recognition and extraction of tumor area from (MRI) magnetic resonance image are an initial interest. The clinical or radiologist specialists performed a time-consuming and tedious task but their precision relies on their experience. Therefore, the usage of computer-aided expertise becomes mandatory to overcome that limitation. A sophisticated fully automated tumor recognition system is proposed to have the maximum accuracy, specificity and sensitivity with a minimum error rate, computational time and competently extract tumor from MRI images. The current study emphases on tumor and edema segmentation that is built on kernel-based fuzzy C-means and skull stripping method. The clustering method amended by merging multiple kernels established on spatial information. Furthermore, once the acquired image is de-noised the automated brain tumor recognition algorithm stripped the outer boundaries of the irrelevant tissue and then the segmentation algorithm is applied to extract the tumor area precisely. For analysis and recording of the experimental result, hundred MRI images are used. The algorithm in the current study is compared and after the experimental result, the algorithms certify having the detection of brain tumor with accuracy i.e. 98.7%, specificity 90.0%, sensitivity 92.8% with minimum error rate 0.002% given by the improved algorithm KFCM while the minimum computation time i.e. 1.64 seconds achieved by Fuzzy K-means (FKM).

References

  1. J. P. Lerch , “Studying neuroanatomy using MRI,” Nat. Neurosci., 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. M. Dale and E. Halgren, “Spatiotemporal mapping of brain activity by integration of multiple imaging modalities,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 202–208, Apr. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. F. B. Mesfin and M. A. Al-Dhahir, Cancer, Brain, Gliomas. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. J. Nissi , “Multi-parametric MRI characterization of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage,” J. Orthop. Res., 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. B. Praveen and A. Agrawal, “Hybrid approach for brain tumor detection and classification in magnetic resonance images,” Int. Conf. Commun. Control Intell. Syst. CCIS 2015, pp. 162–166, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. V. Govindaraj and P. R. Murugan, “A complete automated algorithm for segmentation of tissues and identification of tumor region in T1, T2, and flair brain images using optimization and clustering techniques,” Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 313–325, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Prastawa, E. Bullitt, S. Ho, and G. Gerig, “A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 275–283, Sep. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. H. A. Vrooman , “Multi-spectral brain tissue segmentation using automatically trained k-Nearest-Neighbor classification,” Neuroimage, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 71–81, Aug. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Demirhan, M. Toru, and I. Guler, “Segmentation of Tumor and Edema Along with Healthy Tissues of Brain Using Wavelets and Neural Networks,” IEEE J. Biomed. Heal. Informatics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1451–1458, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Demirhan and I. Güler, “Image segmentation using self-organizing maps and gray level co-occurrence matrices,” J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., vol. 25, no. 2, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ö. Ertürk Çetin, C. İşler, M. Uzan, and Ç. Özkara, “Epilepsy-related brain tumors,” Seizure, vol. 44, pp. 93–97, Jan. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Z. Akkus, A. Galimzianova, A. Hoogi, D. L. Rubin, and B. J. Erickson, “Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions,” Journal of Digital Imaging. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. K. Adhikari, J. K. Sing, D. K. Basu, and M. Nasipuri, “Conditional spatial fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm for segmentation of MRI images,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. L. Xiao, H. Ouyang, and C. Fan, “An improved Otsu method for threshold segmentation based on set mapping and trapezoid region intercept histogram,” Optik (Stuttg)., vol. 196, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. X. Sun , “Histogram-based normalization technique on human brain magnetic resonance images from different acquisitions,” Biomed. Eng. Online, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. D. Gupta and S. Choubey, “Discrete Wavelet Transform for Image Processing,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng., 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Sridevi and C. Mala, “Self-organizing neural networks for image segmentation based on multiphase active contour,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 31, no. S2, pp. 865–876, Feb. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. Ren, H. Wang, H. Feng, C. Xu, G. Liu, and P. Ding, “Study on the improved fuzzy clustering algorithm and its application in brain image segmentation,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Y. T. Chen, “Medical Image Segmentation Using Independent Component Analysis-Based Kernelized Fuzzy c-Means Clustering,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2017, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. B. Garg and G. K. Sharma, “A quality-aware Energy-scalable Gaussian Smoothing Filter for image processing applications,” Microprocess. Microsyst., vol. 45, pp. 1–9, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. ShanmugaPriya and A. Valarmathi, “Efficient fuzzy c-means based multilevel image segmentation for brain tumor detection in MR images,” Des. Autom. Embed. Syst., vol. 22, no. 1–2, pp. 81–93, Jun. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. N. B. Bahadure, A. K. Ray, and H. P. Thethi, “Image Analysis for MRI Based Brain Tumor Detection and Feature Extraction Using Biologically Inspired BWT and SVM,” Int. J. Biomed. Imaging, vol. 2017, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. National Cancer Institute, “Downloading TCIA Images - TCIA Online Help - Cancer Imaging Archive Wiki.” [Online]. Available: https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/NBIA/Downloading+TCIA+Images#DownloadingTCIAImages-DownloadingtheNBIADataRetriever. [Accessed: 04-Dec-2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. N. Sulaiman and N. A. M. Isa, “Adaptive fuzzy-K-means clustering algorithm for image segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBBS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Science
    October 2020
    142 pages
    ISBN:9781450388658
    DOI:10.1145/3431943

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 January 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format