skip to main content
research-article

Urban Accessibility as a Socio-Political Problem: A Multi-Stakeholder Analysis

Published: 05 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Traditionally, urban accessibility is defined as the ease of reaching destinations. Studies on urban accessibility for pedestrians with mobility disabilities (e.g., wheelchair users) have primarily focused on understanding the challenges that the built environment imposes and how they overcome them. In this paper, we move beyond physical barriers and focus on socio-political challenges in the civic ecosystem that impedes accessible infrastructure development. Using a multi-stakeholder approach, we interviewed five primary stakeholder groups (N=25): (1) people with mobility disabilities, (2) caregivers, (3) accessibility advocates, (4) department officials, and (5) policymakers. We discussed their current accessibility assessment and decision-making practices. We identified the key needs and desires of each group, how they differed, and how they interacted with each other in the civic ecosystem to bring about change. We found that people, politics, and money were intrinsically tied to underfunded accessibility improvement projects "without continued support from the public and the political leadership, existing funding may also disappear. Using the insights from these interviews, we explore how may technology enhance our stakeholders" decision-making processes and facilitate accessible infrastructure development.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (v4cscw209aux.zip)
Supplementary Materials ????????????????? Includes Codebook for qualitative study analysis of interview study data.

References

[1]
Rediet Abebe, Solon Barocas, Jon Kleinberg, Karen Levy, Manish Raghavan, and David G. Robinson. Roles for Computing in Social Change. In FAT* 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 252--260. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372871
[2]
Lauren C. Abercrombie, James F. Sallis, Terry L. Conway, Lawrence D. Frank, Brian E. Saelens, and James E. Chapman. 2008. Income and Racial Disparities in Access to Public Parks and Private Recreation Facilities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34, 1: 9--15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.030
[3]
Isabelle Anguelovski, James J. T. Connolly, Laia Masip, and Hamil Pearsall. 2018. Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: a longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona. Urban Geography 39, 3: 458--491. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987
[4]
Pablo Aragón, Claudia Flores-Saviaga, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Christopher A. Le Dantec, and Jorge Saldivar. 2020. Civic Technologies: Research, Practice and Open Challenges. In CSCW 2020 Workshop.
[5]
Mariam Asad and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2015. Illegitimate civic participation: Supporting community activists on the ground. In CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1694--1703. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675156
[6]
Mariam Asad and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2017. Tap the "Make this public" button: A design: Based inquiry into issue advocacy and digital civics. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 6304--6316. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026034
[7]
Mariam Asad, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Becky Nielsen, and Kate Diedrick. 2017. Creating a Sociotechnical API: Designing City-Scale Community Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 2295--2306. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025963
[8]
Yicheng Bai, Wenyan Jia, Hong Zhang, Zhi-Hong Mao, and Mingui Sun. 2014. Landmark-Based Indoor Positioning for Visually Impaired Individuals. International conference on signal processing proceedings. International Conference on Signal Processing 2014: 678--681. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSP.2014.7015087
[9]
Juan Pablo Bocarejo S. and Daniel Ricardo Oviedo H. 2012. Transport accessibility and social inequities: a tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments. Journal of Transport Geography 24: 142--154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.004
[10]
Kirsten Boehner and Carl Disalvo. 2016. Data, design and civics: An exploratory study of civic tech. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2970--2981. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858326
[11]
N. Bolten, S. Mukherjee, V. Sipeeva, A. Tanweer, and A. Caspi. 2017. A pedestrian-centered data approach for equitable access to urban infrastructure environments. IBM Journal of Research and Development 61, 6: 101--1012. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2017.2736279
[12]
Mark Bovens. 2007. Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal 13, 4: 447--468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
[13]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101. Retrieved July 11, 2014 from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[14]
Jane Campbell and Mike Oliver. 2013. Disability politics: Understanding our past, changing our future. Routledge.
[15]
Soon Ae Chun, Stuart Shulman, Rodrigo Sandoval, and Eduard Hovy. 2010. Government 2.0: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government. Information Polity 15, 1,2: 1--9. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2010-0205
[16]
Richard L. Church and James R. Marston. 2003. Measuring Accessibility for People with a Disability. Geographical Analysis 35, 1: 83--96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.2003.tb01102.x
[17]
Civil Rights Division United States Department of Justice. 1990. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Pub. L. No. 101--336, 104 Stat. 328. Retrieved September 14, 2017 from https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/history/35th/thelaw/ada.html
[18]
Colding, Barthel, and Sörqvist. 2019. Wicked Problems of Smart Cities. Smart Cities 2, 4: 512--521. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities2040031
[19]
Eric Corbett and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2018. The problem of community engagement: Disentangling the practices of municipal government. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174148
[20]
Clara Crivellaro, Rob Anderson, Daniel Lambton-Howard, Tom Nappey, Patrick Olivier, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Alexander Wilson, and Pete Wright. 2019. Infrastructuring public service transformation: Creating collaborative spaces between communities and institutions through HCI research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26, 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3310284
[21]
M. Q. Dalvi and K. M. Martin. 1976. The measurement of accessibility: Some preliminary results. Transportation 5, 1: 17--42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165245
[22]
Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2019. Infrastructures of Digital Civics: Transportation, Advocacy, and Mobile Computing. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 169--184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20725-0_8
[23]
Christopher A. Le Dantec, Mariam Asad, Aditi Misra, and Kari E. Watkins. 2015. Planning with Crowdsourced Data: Rhetoric and Representation in Transportation Planning. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15, 1717--1727. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675212
[24]
Christopher A. Le Dantec, Kari E. Watkins, Russ Clark, and Elizabeth Mynatt. 2015. Cycle atlanta and OneBusAway: Driving innovation through the data ecosystems of civic computing. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 327--338. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21006-3_32
[25]
Christopher A Le Dantec. 2014. Data-Based Civic Participation. In Second AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing.
[26]
Kevin C. Desouza and Akshay Bhagwatwar. 2012. Citizen Apps to Solve Complex Urban Problems. Journal of Urban Technology 19, 3: 107--136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2012.673056
[27]
Kevin C. Desouza and Akshay Bhagwatwar. 2014. Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of U.S. Cities. Journal of Urban Technology 21, 4: 25--50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.954898
[28]
Talitha Dubow, Axelle Devaux, Christian Stolk, and Catriona Manville. 2017. Civic Engagement: How can digital technologies underpin citizen-powered democracy? RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/cf373
[29]
Ahmed El-Geneidy, David Levinson, Ehab Diab, Genevieve Boisjoly, David Verbich, and Charis Loong. 2016. The cost of equity: Assessing transit accessibility and social disparity using total travel cost. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 91: 302--316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.07.003
[30]
Elizabeth Ellcessor. 2010. Bridging disibility divides: A critical history of web content accessibility through 2001. Information Communication and Society 13, 3: 289--308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180903456546
[31]
Rosemary D. F Bromley, David L. Matthews, and Colin J. Thomas. 2007. City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.009
[32]
Jenille Fairbanks, Kenneth D. Plowman, and Brad L. Rawlins. 2007. Transparency in government communication. Journal of Public Affairs 7, 1: 23--37. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.245
[33]
Navid Fallah, Ilias Apostolopoulos, Kostas Bekris, and Eelke Folmer. 2012. The user as a sensor: navigating users with visual impairments in indoor spaces using tactile landmarks. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, 425. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207735
[34]
Marcus Foth, Leonardo Parra Agudelo, and Robin Palleis. 2013. Digital soapboxes: towards an interaction design agenda for situated civic innovation. 725--728. https://doi.org/10.1145/2494091.2495995
[35]
Lance Freeman. 2005. Displacement or Succession?: Residential Mobility in Gentrifying Neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review 40, 4: 463--491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404273341
[36]
Jon E. Froehlich, Anke M. Brock, Anat Caspi, João Guerreiro, Kotaro Hara, Reuben Kirkham, Johannes Schöning, and Benjamin Tannert. 2019. Grand challenges in accessible maps. Interactions 26, 2: 78--81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301657
[37]
Jon E. Froehlich, Michael Saugstad, Manaswi Saha, and Matthew Johnson. 2020. Towards Mapping and Assessing Sidewalk Accessibility Across Socio- cultural and Geographic Contexts. In AVI Workshop on Data4Good - Designing for Diversity and Development (To Appear), 6.
[38]
Adriana Alvarado Garcia and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2018. Quotidian report: Grassroots data practices to address public safety. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274286
[39]
Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Alyson L. Young, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2017. On making data actionable: How activists use imperfect data to foster social change for human rights violations in Mexico. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW: 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134654
[40]
Amin Gharebaghi, Mir-Abolfazl Mostafavi, Seyed Chavoshi, Geoffrey Edwards, and Patrick Fougeyrollas. 2018. The Role of Social Factors in the Accessibility of Urban Areas for People with Motor Disabilities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7, 4: 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7040131
[41]
Amin Gharebaghi and Mir Abolfazl Mostafavi. 2016. A New Ontological Perspective For Integration Of Social And Physical Environments: Disability And Rehabilitation Context. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences III-2: 137--142. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-2-137-2016
[42]
Sucheta Ghoshal, Andrea Grimes Parker, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Carl Disalvo, Lilly Irani, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. Design and the Politics of Collaboration: A Grassroots Perspective. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 468--473. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359438
[43]
Ruth Glass. 1964. London?: aspects of change. MacGibbon & Kee, London.
[44]
Jonathan Glick. 2008. Gentrification and the Racialized Geography of Home Equity. Urban Affairs Review 44, 2: 280--295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408316971
[45]
George Grier. 1978. Urban displacement?: a reconnaissance. Grier Partnership, Bethesda Md.
[46]
Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen. 2012. Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: an experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences 78, 1: 50--73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429667
[47]
Carl Grodach and Anastasia Loukaitou?Sideris. 2007. Cultural Development Strategies and Urban Revitalization: A Survey of US Cities. International Journal of Cultural Policy 13, 4: 349--370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701683235
[48]
Sihui Guo, Ci Song, Tao Pei, Yaxi Liu, Ting Ma, Yunyan Du, Jie Chen, Zide Fan, Xianli Tang, Yong Peng, and Yanbin Wang. 2019. Accessibility to urban parks for elderly residents: Perspectives from mobile phone data. Landscape and Urban Planning 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103642
[49]
H Hahn. 1986. Disability and the urban environment: a perspective on Los Angeles. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 4, 3: 273--288. https://doi.org/10.1068/d040273
[50]
Harlan Hahn. 1985. Toward a politics of disability: Definitions, disciplines, and policies. The Social Science Journal. Retrieved from https://www.independentliving.org/docs4/hahn2.html
[51]
Walter G. Hansen. 1959. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Planning Association 25, 2: 73--76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
[52]
Kotaro Hara, Christine Chan, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2016. The Design of Assistive Location-based Technologies for People with Ambulatory Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 1757--1768. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858315
[53]
Kotaro Hara and Jon E. Froehlich. 2015. Characterizing and visualizing physical world accessibility at scale using crowdsourcing, computer vision, and machine learning. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 113: 13--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/2850440.2850442
[54]
Kotaro Hara, Vicki Le, and Jon Froehlich. 2013. Combining crowdsourcing and google street view to identify street-level accessibility problems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, 631. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470744
[55]
Mike Harding, Bran Knowles, Nigel Davies, and Mark Rouncefield. 2015. HCI, civic engagement & trust. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2833--2842. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702255
[56]
David Harvey. 2003. The Fetish of Technology: Causes and Consequences. Macalester International 13, 1: 7.
[57]
Rob Imrie. 2000. Disabling Environments and the Geography of Access Policies and Practices. Disability and Society 15, 1: 5--24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590025748
[58]
Lyn Jongbloed and Anne Crichton. 1990. Difficulties in Shifting from Individualistic to Socio-political Policy regarding Disability in Canada. Disability, Handicap & Society 5, 1: 25--36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649066780021
[59]
US Department of Justice Civic Rights Division. Introduction to the ADA. Retrieved September 21, 2020 from https://www.ada.gov/ada_intro.htm
[60]
US Department of Justice. 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Retrieved December 19, 2019 from https://www.ada.gov/2010ADAstandards_index.htm
[61]
Naveena Karusala, Jennifer Wilson, Phebe Vayanos, and Eric Rice. 2019. Street-Level Realities of Data Practices in Homeless Services Provision. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359286
[62]
Rob Kitchin and Robert Wilton. 2003. Disability activism and the politics of scale. The Canadian Geographer/Le G?ographe canadien 47, 2: 97--115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0064.00005
[63]
Reinout Kleinhans, Maarten Van Ham, and Jennifer Evans-Cowley. 2015. Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and Self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance. Planning Practice and Research 30, 237--247. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1051320
[64]
Helen Larkin, Danielle Hitch, Valerie Watchorn, and Susan Ang. 2015. Working with policy and regulatory factors to implement universal design in the built environment: The Australian experience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12, 7: 8157--8171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120708157
[65]
Daniela Antunes Lessa, Carlos Lobo, and Leandro Cardoso. 2019. Accessibility and urban mobility by bus in Belo Horizonte/Minas Gerais -- Brazil. Journal of Transport Geography 77: 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.04.004
[66]
Arlene Mayerson. 1992. The History of ADA, a Movement Perspective. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://dredf.org/about-us/publications/the-history-of-the-ada/
[67]
Brian McInnis, Marta Poblet, Alissa Centivany, Karen Levy, Juho Kim, and Gilly Leshed. 2017. Crowdsourcing law and policy: A design-thinking approach to crowd-civic systems. In CSCW 2017 - Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 355--361. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022656
[68]
H. Filiz Alkan Meshur. 2013. Accessibility for people with disabilities in urban spaces: A case study of Ankara, Turkey. Archnet-IJAR 7, 2: 43--60. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v7i2.154
[69]
Allan R. Meyers, Jennifer J. Anderson, Donald R. Miller, Kathy Shipp, and Helen Hoenig. 2002. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: Substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Social Science and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277--9536(01)00269-6
[70]
Aditi Misra, Aaron Gooze, Kari Watkins, Mariam Asad, and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2014. Crowdsourcing and Its Application to Transportation Data Collection and Management. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2414, 1: 1--8. https://doi.org/10.3141/2414-01
[71]
Iva Mrak, Tiziana Campisi, Giovanni Tesoriere, Antonino Canale, and Margareta Cindri?. 2019. The role of urban and social factors in the accessibility of urban areas for people with motor and visual disabilities. 160008. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138076
[72]
Michael J Muller. 2002. Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA, 1051--1068.
[73]
Matti Nelimarkka. 2019. A Review of Research on Participation in Democratic Decision-Making Presented at SIGCHI Conferences. Toward an Improved Trading Zone Between Political Science and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359241
[74]
Kathe Newman and Philip Ashton. 2004. Neoliberal Urban Policy and New Paths of Neighborhood Change in the American Inner City. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 36, 7: 1151--1172. https://doi.org/10.1068/a36229
[75]
Patrick Olivier and Peter Wright. 2015. Digital civics: Taking a local turn. Interactions 22, 61--63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2776885
[76]
Horst W.J. Rittel and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4, 2: 155--169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
[77]
Manaswi Saha, Alexander J. Fiannaca, Melanie Kneisel, Edward Cutrell, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2019. Closing the Gap: Designing for the Last-Few-Meters Wayfinding Problem for People with Visual Impairments. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS '19, 222--235. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353776
[78]
Manaswi Saha, Michael Saugstad, Hanuma Teja Maddali, Aileen Zeng, Ryan Holland, Steven Bower, Aditya Dash, Sage Chen, Anthony Li, Kotaro Hara, and Jon Froehlich. 2019. Project Sidewalk: A Web-based Crowdsourcing Tool for Collecting Sidewalk Accessibility Data At Scale. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300292
[79]
Jorge Saldivar, Cristhian Parra, Marcelo Alcaraz, Rebeca Arteta, and Luca Cernuzzi. 2018. Civic Technology for Social Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal 27, 3-6: 1215--1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9311-7
[80]
Kelly Shigeno, Sergio Borger, Diego Gallo, Ricardo Herrmann, Mateus Molinaro, Carlos Cardonha, Fernando Koch, and Priscilla Avegliano. 2013. Citizen sensing for collaborative construction of accessibility maps. In W4A 2013 - International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2461121.2461153
[81]
Lisa Stafford and Claudia Baldwin. 2018. Planning Walkable Neighborhoods: Are We Overlooking Diversity in Abilities and Ages? Journal of Planning Literature 33, 1: 17--30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217704649
[82]
Kentaro Toyama. 2015. Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology.
[83]
Katherine VanHoose and Federico Savini. 2017. The social capital of urban activism. City 21, 3-4: 293--311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1325207
[84]
Raquel Velho. 2019. Transport accessibility for wheelchair users: A qualitative analysis of inclusion and health. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 8, 2: 103--115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.04.005
[85]
Anthony J Viera, Joanne M Garrett, and others. 2005. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37, 5: 360--363. Retrieved from http://www.stfm.org/FamilyMedicine/Vol37Issue5/Viera360
[86]
Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Eric Gordon, Pete Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2016. Digital civics: Citizen empowerment with and through technology. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1096--1099. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2886436
[87]
Amy Voida, Lynn Dombrowski, Gillian R. Hayes, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2014. Shared values/conflicting logics: working around e-government systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3583--3592. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288
[88]
Martin Wachs and T. Gordon Kumagai. 1973. Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 7, 5: 437--456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(73)90041--4
[89]
Lingjing Wang, Cheng Qian, Philipp Kats, Constantine Kontokosta, and Stanislav Sobolevsky. 2017. Structure of 311 service requests as a signature of urban location. PLoS ONE 12, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186314
[90]
Sacoby Wilson, Malo Hutson, and Mahasin Mujahid. 2008. How Planning and Zoning Contribute to Inequitable Development, Neighborhood Health, and Environmental Injustice. Environmental Justice 1, 4: 211--216. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2008.0506
[91]
Sacoby M. Wilson, Christopher D. Heaney, John Cooper, and Omega Wilson. 2008. Built Environment Issues in Unserved and Underserved African-American Neighborhoods in North Carolina. Environmental Justice 1, 2: 63--72. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2008.0509
[92]
Miriam Zuk, Ariel H. Bierbaum, Karen Chapple, Karolina Gorska, and Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris. 2018. Gentrification, Displacement, and the Role of Public Investment. Journal of Planning Literature 33, 1: 31--44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217716439
[93]
The New Urban Agenda - Habitat III. Retrieved May 10, 2020 from http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/
[94]
Public Rights-of-Way - United States Access Board. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/streets-sidewalks/public-rights-of-way
[95]
Chapter 5"Model Sidewalks - United States Access Board. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/streets-sidewalks/public-rights-of-way/guidance-and-research/accessible-public-rights-of-way-planning-and-design-for-alterations/chapter-5-model-sidewalks
[96]
Proposed Rights-of-Way Guidelines - United States Access Board. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/streets-sidewalks/public-rights-of-way/proposed-rights-of-way-guidelines
[97]
Part II of II: Best Practices Design Guide - Sidewalk - Publications - Bicycle and Pedestrian Program | US FHWA. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/publications/sidewalk2/sidewalks204.cfm
[98]
Architectural Barriers Act - United States Access Board. Retrieved December 2, 2019 from https://www.access-board.gov/the-board/laws/architectural-barriers-act-aba
[99]
Denver agrees to install curb ramps to comply with federal rules -- The Denver Post. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://www.denverpost.com/2016/03/15/denver-agrees-to-install-curb-ramps-to-comply-with-federal-rules/
[100]
Settlement: Seattle to build thousands of sidewalk curb ramps over next 18 years | The Seattle Times. Retrieved July 10, 2019 from https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/settlement-seattle-to-build-thousands-of-sidewalk-curb-ramps-over-next-18-years/
[101]
Curb Ramp Construction | City of Columbus. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://www.columbus.gov/publicservice/Design-and-Construction/document-library/Curb-Ramp-Construction/
[102]
Increasing Accessibility City by City -- Curb Ramps | CREEC. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://creeclaw.org/increasing-accessibility-city-by-city-curb-ramps/
[103]
3 Cities Taking On ADA Compliant Curb Ramps | Tekway High Performance ADA Tiles by StrongGo. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://www.stronggo.com/blog/3-cities-taking-ada-compliant-curb-ramps
[104]
ADA Lawsuits Target Poorly Maintained Sidewalks - CityLab. Retrieved July 10, 2019 from https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/08/crumbling-sidewalks-become-a-legal-battleground/567562/
[105]
Opinion | New York Has a Great Subway, if You're Not in a Wheelchair - The New York Times. Retrieved December 5, 2019 from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/29/opinion/new-york-has-a-great-subway-if-youre-not-in-a-wheelchair.html
[106]
Los Angeles ADA Settlement: Willits v. City of Los Angeles. Retrieved July 10, 2019 from http://www.losangelesadasettlement.org/
[107]
Willits v. City of LA Sidewalk Settlement Announced | Office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti. Retrieved July 10, 2019 from https://www.lamayor.org/willits-v-city-la-sidewalk-settlement-announced
[108]
Lan Remme V. City of Seattle and State of Washington / 2013 ? Keith Kessler. Retrieved November 7, 2019 from https://www.keithkesslerlaw.com/cases/2018/8/28/lan-remme-v-city-of-seattle-and-state-of-washington-2013
[109]
Sidewalk Repair Program - Transportation | seattle.gov. Retrieved December 20, 2019 from https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/maintenance-and-paving/sidewalk-repair-program
[110]
DDOT Guidelines for Comprehensive Transportation Review (CTR) Requirements | ddot. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://ddot.dc.gov/publication/ddot-guidelines-comprehensive-transportation-review-ctr-requirements
[111]
pathVu | Pedestrians. Retrieved February 17, 2020 from http://www.pathvu.com/solutions_byrole_pedestrians
[112]
Beyond Tech: Policymaking in a Digital Age - Code for America Blog - Medium. Retrieved January 10, 2020 from https://medium.com/code-for-america/beyond-tech-policymaking-in-a-digital-age-2776b9a17b69
[113]
The Right Way to Make Cities Smart - The Atlantic. Retrieved November 23, 2019 from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/05/the-right-way-to-make-cities-smart/370900/
[114]
Cory Booker calls for tech-empowered open democracy | Pando. Retrieved January 11, 2020 from https://pando.com/2013/03/10/cory-booker-calls-for-tech-empowered-open-democracy/
[115]
What Is 311? Retrieved November 24, 2019 from https://www.govtech.com/dc/articles/What-is-311.html
[116]
SeeClickFix | 311 Request and Work Management Software. Retrieved March 21, 2018 from https://en.seeclickfix.com/
[117]
Street Bump. Retrieved March 22, 2018 from http://www.streetbump.org/
[118]
Find It, Fix It - Service Request Mobile App - Customer Service Bureau | seattle.gov. Retrieved November 24, 2019 from https://www.seattle.gov/customer-service-bureau/find-it-fix-it-mobile-app
[119]
MRSC - City and Town Forms of Government. Retrieved March 19, 2020 from http://mrsc.org/Home/Explore-Topics/Legal/General-Government/City-and-Town-Forms-of-Government.aspx
[120]
Neighborhood walk-throughs help Rome officials witness problems firsthand - News - Uticaod - Utica, NY. Retrieved March 6, 2020 from https://www.uticaod.com/news/20160720/neighborhood-walk-throughs-help-rome-officials-witness-problems-firsthand
[121]
Data Collection App | Collector for ArcGIS - Capture Field Data. Retrieved August 9, 2019 from https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/collector-for-arcgis/overview
[122]
Cyclomedia. Retrieved May 31, 2020 from https://www.cyclomedia.com/us
[123]
Service Requests (311) - Datasets - US City Open Data Census. Retrieved November 24, 2019 from http://us-city.census.okfn.org/dataset/service-requests
[124]
How Civic Technology Can Help Stop a Pandemic | Foreign Affairs. Retrieved May 14, 2020 from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2020-03--20/how-civic-technology-can-help-stop-pandemic?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter_cta&utm_campaign=cta_share_buttons
[125]
Property Owners? Responsibilities - Transportation | seattle.gov. Retrieved May 14, 2020 from https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/maintenance-and-paving/property-owners-responsibilities
[126]
NYC DOT - New York City Administrative Code Sidewalk Rules. Retrieved May 14, 2020 from https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/infrastructure/19-152.shtml
[127]
Sidewalk Repair | ddot. Retrieved February 14, 2020 from https://ddot.dc.gov/node/544192
[128]
Shovel Your Sidewalk | ddot. Retrieved May 14, 2020 from https://ddot.dc.gov/page/shovel-your-sidewalk
[129]
Lawmakers approve 'block the box' bill allowing Seattle to ticket drivers for blocking crosswalks, bus lanes | Q13 FOX News. Retrieved May 18, 2020 from https://q13fox.com/2020/03/10/lawmakers-approve-block-the-box-bill-allowing-seattle-to-ticket-drivers-for-blocking-crosswalks-bus-lanes/
[130]
Don't Block the Box Bill Passes State Legislature | The Urbanist. Retrieved May 18, 2020 from https://www.theurbanist.org/2020/03/09/dont-block-the-box-bill-passes-state-legislature/
[131]
How Mesa is Using Data to Guide CARES Relief -- CitiesSpeak. Retrieved April 30, 2020 from https://citiesspeak.org/2020/04/27/how-mesa-is-using-data-to-guide-cares-relief/
[132]
Technology Is Not the Answer - The Atlantic. Retrieved April 1, 2020 from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/03/technology-is-not-the-answer/73065/
[133]
How Congress turns citizens? voices into data points. Retrieved May 8, 2020 from https://theconversation.com/how-congress-turns-citizens-voices-into-data-points-120869
[134]
Rock Spring and White Flint 2 Design Guidelines | Montgomery Planning. Retrieved May 16, 2020 from https://montgomeryplanning.org/planning/communities/area-2/rock-spring-and-white-flint-2-design-guidelines/
[135]
Chapter 4: Ramps and Curb Ramps - United States Access Board. Retrieved May 14, 2020 from https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/guide-to-the-ada-standards/chapter-4-ramps-and-curb-ramps
[136]
2019. Delivery-driven Policy, Policy designed for the digital age. Retrieved from http://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/codeforamerica-cms1/documents/delivery-driven-policy-code-for-america.pdf

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Justice-centered best practices for accessibility to public buildings in a tier II city: Insights from a Delphi expert consensusF1000Research10.12688/f1000research.156920.113(1145)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Whose Participation Counts? Towards Technology-Mediated Equitable Futures of Development WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869798:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Not a “Typical Expat”: An Autoethnographic Account on Accessible RelocationProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3688546(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Urban Accessibility as a Socio-Political Problem: A Multi-Stakeholder Analysis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW3
    CSCW
    December 2020
    1825 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3446568
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 January 2021
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. advocacy
    2. civic engagement
    3. digital civics
    4. physical accessibility
    5. policymaking
    6. politics
    7. urban technology

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)207
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
    Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Justice-centered best practices for accessibility to public buildings in a tier II city: Insights from a Delphi expert consensusF1000Research10.12688/f1000research.156920.113(1145)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Whose Participation Counts? Towards Technology-Mediated Equitable Futures of Development WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869798:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Not a “Typical Expat”: An Autoethnographic Account on Accessible RelocationProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3688546(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Moving Towards Mobility Justice: Challenges and Considerations for Supporting AdvocacyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373738:CSCW1(1-22)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)“I never realized sidewalks were a big deal”: A Case Study of a Community-Driven Sidewalk Accessibility Assessment using Project SidewalkProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642003(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Migrants’ community building in two Montenegrin informal neighborhoodsCommunity Development10.1080/15575330.2024.232963055:5(730-753)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Fostering Inclusive Urban Design and Planning: Enhanced Trust and Reliability through Descriptive Instructions for Digital Citizen ParticipationJournal of Urban Technology10.1080/10630732.2024.242172931:4-5(25-48)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2024
    • (2023)Multiple-Stakeholder Perspectives on Accessibility Data and the Use of Socio-Technical Tools to Improve Sidewalk AccessibilityDisabilities10.3390/disabilities30400403:4(621-638)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Mental health challenges and digital platform opportunities in patients and families affected by pediatric neuromuscular diseases - experiences from SwitzerlandDIGITAL HEALTH10.1177/205520762312137009Online publication date: 16-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Eliciting Empathy towards Urban Accessibility IssuesProceedings of the 15th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter10.1145/3605390.3605416(1-13)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media