skip to main content
10.1145/3434074.3447130acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Perceptual Effects of Ambient Sound on an Artificial Agent's Rate of Speech

Published:08 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interactive robots are increasingly being deployed in public spaces that may differ in context from moment to moment. One important aspect of this context is the soundscape of the robot and human's shared environment, such as an airport that is noisy during a weekend rush hour, yet quiet on a weekday evening. Just as humans are adept at adapting their speech appropriately to their environment, robots should adjust their speech characteristics (e.g. speech rate, volume) to their context. We studied the effect of a shared auditory soundscape on the perceived ideal speech rate of an artificial agent. We tasked raters to listen to a combination of text-to-speech (TTS) samples with different speech rates and soundscape samples from freesound.org and to evaluate the appropriateness of the speech combination and social perception of artificial speech. Contrary to our expectations, faster artificial speech in louder environments and slower speech in quieter environments were not preferred by raters. This suggests that further research into how exactly to adapt artificial speech to background noise is necessary.

References

  1. M. L. Walters, D. S. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, R. Boekhorst, and K. L. Koay, "Avoiding the Uncanny Valley, Robot Appearance, Personality and Consistency of Behavior in an Attention Seeking Home Scenario for a Robot Companion," Autonomous Robots, Vol. 24, No.2, pp. 159--178, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Meyer von Wolff, S. Hobert, and M. Schumann, "How May I Help You? -- State of the Art and Open Research Questions for Chatbots at the Digital Workplace," In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp. 95--104, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Okuno, T. Kanda, M. Imai, H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita, "Providing Route Directions: Design of Robot's Utterance, Gesture, and Timing". In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 53--60, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. P. Fulford, and S. Zhang, "Perceptions of Interaction: The Critical Predictor in Distance Education". American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 8--21, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. T. Johnstone, and K. R. Scherer, "Vocal Communication of Emotion". The Handbook of Emotion, pp. 220--235, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. B. Buller, B. A. L. Poire , R. K. Aune, and S. V. Eloy, "Social Perceptions as Mediators of the Effect of Speech Rate Similarity on Compliance." Human Communication Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 286--311, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. B. K. Simonds, K. R. Meyer, M. M. Quinlan, and S. K. Hunt, "Effects of Instructor Speech Rate on Student Affective Learning." Recall, and Perceptions of Nonverbal Immediacy, Credibility, and Clarity. Communication Research Reports, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 187--197, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. A. Goodman, D. H. Robinson, S. L. Robinson, C. H. Skinner., and H. E. Sterling, "Effects of Advertisement Speech Rates on Feature Recognition,and Product and Speaker Rating." International Journal of Listening, Vol. 13, pp. 97--110, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. P. Fulford, "A Model of Cognitive Speed. International Journal of Instructional Media", Vo. 28, No. 1, pp. 31--41, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. W. Kraus, "Voice-only communication enhances empathic accuracy." American Psychologist Vol. 72, No. 7, pp. 644--654, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. Breazeal, "Emotive qualities in robot speech", In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJInternational Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1389--1394, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P.Taylor, "Text-to-Speech Synthesis", Cambridge university press, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. W. Frick, "Communicating emotion' The role of prosodic features", Psychological Bulletin, Vol.97, No.3, pp. 412--429, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. K. Scherer, "Vocal Affect Expression: A Review and a Model for Future Research," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 99, No. 2, pp.143, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. C.M. Carpinella,. A.B. Wyman, M.A. Perez and S.J. Stroessner, "The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS): Development and Validation," In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 6, No. 9, pp. 254--262, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. H. Lane and B. Tranel, "The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.677--709, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Perceptual Effects of Ambient Sound on an Artificial Agent's Rate of Speech

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '21 Companion: Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2021
      756 pages
      ISBN:9781450382908
      DOI:10.1145/3434074
      • General Chairs:
      • Cindy Bethel,
      • Ana Paiva,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Elizabeth Broadbent,
      • David Feil-Seifer,
      • Daniel Szafir

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 March 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate192of519submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader