Cited By
View all- Jiang XNamokel MWu JWang LWu X(2023)Research on Driverless VehicleAdvanced Manufacturing and Automation XII10.1007/978-981-19-9338-1_51(413-420)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2023
Back to the Future: Opinions of Autonomous Cars Over Time
Pages 157 - 161
Abstract
The aim of this research was to investigate whether preferences of U.S. adults regarding autonomous vehicles have changed in the past decade. We believe this to be indicative of the effect of cultural shifts over time in preferences regarding robots, similar to the effect of cultural and national differences on preferences regarding robots (e.g. [9],[14]). By replicating a 2009 survey regarding autonomous vehicle parking, we found that participants ranked four out of six parking and transportation options significantly differently now particularly for an autonomous vehicle with no override, a taxi, driving a standard vehicle, and being next to a vehicle driven by another person. Additionally, we found partial support that participants who were more informed about autonomous vehicle technology showed an increase in preferences for autonomous vehicles.
References
[1]
2019. California Autonomous Vehicles Disengagement Report. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/autonomous-vehicles/disengagement-reports/.
[2]
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. [n.d.]. The Grand Challenge. https://www.darpa.mil/about-us/timeline/-grand-challenge-for-autonomous-vehicles.
[3]
Victoria A Banks, Alexander Eriksson, Jim O'Donoghue, and Neville A Stanton. 2018. Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study. Applied ergonomics, Vol. 68 (2018), 138--145.
[4]
P. H. Batavia, D. E. Pomerleau, and C. E. Thorpe. 1997. Overtaking vehicle detection using implicit optical flow. In Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 729--734.
[5]
M. Conway, D. Salon, and D. King. 2018. Trends in Taxi Use and the Advent of Ridehailing, 1995--2017: Evidence from the US National Household Travel Survey. Urban Science, Vol. 2, 3 (2018), 79.
[6]
A. Davies. 2018. The WIRED Guide to Self-Driving Cars. https://www.wired.com/story/guide-self-driving-cars/.
[7]
Shuchisnigdha Deb, Lesley Strawderman, Daniel W. Carruth, Janice DuBien, Brian Smith, and Teena M. Garrison. 2017. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess pedestrian receptivity toward fully autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 84 (2017), 178--195.
[8]
M. Desai, K. Stubbs, A. Steinfeld, and H. Yanco. 2009. Creating Trustworthy Robots: Lessons and Inspirations from Automated Systems. In Proceedings of the AISB Convention: New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6552464.v1
[9]
V. Evers, H. Maldonado, T. Brodecki, and P. Hinds. 2008. Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI. In 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 255--262.
[10]
Lynn M Hulse, Hui Xie, and Edwin R Galea. 2018. Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science, Vol. 102 (2018), 1--13.
[11]
P. Ioannou. 1998. Evaluation and Analysis of Automated Highway System Concepts and Architectures. Technical Report UCB-ITS-PRR-98--12. University of Southern California.
[12]
M. Issit. 2019. Autonomous Car. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Science (2019).
[13]
T. Jochem. [n.d.]. TRIP COMPLETE !! https://www.cs.cmu.edu/tjochem/nhaa/nhaa_home_page.html.
[14]
T Nomura. 2017. Cultural differences in social acceptance of robots. In 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 534--538.
[15]
Weina Qu, Jing Xu, Yan Ge, Xianghong Sun, and Kan Zhang. 2019. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess public receptivity toward autonomous vehicles and its relation with the traffic safety climate in China. Accident Analysis |& Prevention, Vol. 128 (2019), 78--86.
[16]
Katta Spiel, Oliver L. Haimson, and Danielle Lottridge. 2019. How to Do Better with Gender on Surveys: A Guide for HCI Researchers. Interactions, Vol. 26, 4 (June 2019), 62--65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338283
[17]
Qualtrics Support. [n.d.]. Check Survey Accessibility. https://www.qualtrics.com/support/survey-platform/survey-module/survey-tools/check-survey-accessibility/.
[18]
JASP Team. 2020. JASP (Version 0.12.2). Computer Software.
[19]
Nathan L Tenhundfeld, Ewart J de Visser, Kerstin S Haring, Anthony J Ries, Victor S Finomore, and Chad C Tossell. 2019. Calibrating trust in automation through familiarity with the autoparking feature of a Tesla Model X. Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making, Vol. 13, 4 (2019), 279--294.
[20]
Nathan L Tenhundfeld, Ewart J de Visser, Anthony J Ries, Victor S Finomore, and Chad C Tossell. 2020. Trust and distrust of automated parking in a Tesla Model X. Human factors, Vol. 62, 2 (2020), 194--210.
[21]
K. Tomzcak, A. Pelter, C. Gutierrez, T. Stretch, D. Hilf, B. Donadio, N. L. Tenhundfeld, E. J. de Visser, and C. C. Tossell. 2019. Let Tesla Park Your Tesla: Driver Trust in a Semi-Automated Car. In 2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS). 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735647
[22]
V. Venkatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unifed View. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, 3 (2003), 425--478.
[23]
B. Vlasic and N.E. Boudette. 2016. Self-Driving Tesla Was Involved in Fatal Crash, U.S. Says. The New York Times (2016).
[24]
Scott R Winter, Joseph R Keebler, Stephen Rice, Rian Mehta, and Bradley S Baugh. 2018. Patient perceptions on the use of driverless ambulances: An affective perspective. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, Vol. 58 (2018), 431--441.
Index Terms
- Back to the Future: Opinions of Autonomous Cars Over Time
Recommendations
Autonomous Cars: Past, Present and Future
ICINCO 2015: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1The field of autonomous automation is of interest to researchers, and much has been accomplished in this
area, of which this paper presents a detailed chronology. This paper can help one understand the trends in
autonomous vehicle technology for the ...
Development the Cockpit of the Autonomous Cars
Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Thinking and Practice in Contemporary and Emerging TechnologiesAbstractThe evolution of cars has been notorious over the years, since the first four-wheeled car, that emerged in mid-1891 up to the present day, where it’s already possible to see semi-autonomous cars.
Currently, and with the constant automotive ...
Priming Drivers before Handover in Semi-Autonomous Cars
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSemi-autonomous vehicles occasionally require control to be handed over to the driver in situations where the vehicle is unable to operate safely. Currently, such handover requests require the driver to take control almost instantaneously. We ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2021
756 pages
ISBN:9781450382908
DOI:10.1145/3434074
- General Chairs:
- Cindy Bethel,
- Ana Paiva,
- Program Chairs:
- Elizabeth Broadbent,
- David Feil-Seifer,
- Daniel Szafir
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 08 March 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
Conference
HRI '21: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 8 - 11, 2021
CO, Boulder, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 197Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)11
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Jiang XNamokel MWu JWang LWu X(2023)Research on Driverless VehicleAdvanced Manufacturing and Automation XII10.1007/978-981-19-9338-1_51(413-420)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2023
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in