skip to main content
10.1145/3434074.3447176acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Psychosocial Impact of Collaborating with an Autonomous Mobile Robot: Results of an Exploratory Case Study

Published: 08 March 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The study was part of a confidential pilot project concerning the introduction of Autonomous Mobile Robots in an order picking process. The study assesses the impact of working with an AMR on logistics workers (hereinafter referred to as 'operators'). Two research questions were investigated. First, does working with an AMR lead to increased psychosocial workload? And second, what is the perception of the operators working with an AMR? Very little research, outside a lab context, has been done so far on the impact of working with an AMR. This study contributes to the understanding of the impact of working with robots, outside the lab in an industrial setting. The results of this study can be summarized as follows: 1) working with an AMR does not lead to extra psychosocial workload and 2) there is a positive perception and attitude versus working with an AMR.

References

[1]
PR Newswire, "The World's Autonomous Mobile Robots Industry, 2020--2030 - Increasing Demand for Automation Solutions and Flourishing e-Commerce Industry," 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-worlds-autonomous-mobile-robots-industry-2020--2030--increasing-demand-for-automation-solutions-and-flourishing-e-commerce-industry-301037410.html. [Accessed: 14-Dec-2020].
[2]
Boston Consulting Group, "Can Delivery Companies Keep Up with the E-Commerce Boom?" 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.bcg.com/en-be/publications/2020/can-delivery-companies-keep-up-with-the-ecommerce-boom. [Accessed: 14-Dec-2020].
[3]
"AGV vs. AMR - What's the Difference? | Mobile Industrial Robots." [Online]. Available: https://www.mobile-industrial-robots.com/en/insights/get-started-with-amrs/agv-vs-amr-whats-the-difference/. [Accessed: 21-Oct-2020].
[4]
J. O. Crawford et al., Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: from research to practice. What can be learnt? European Union. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work -- EU-OSHA, 2020.
[5]
P. A. Lasota, T. Fong, and J. A. Shah, "A Survey of Methods for Safe Human-Robot Interaction," Found. Trends Robot., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 261--349, 2017.
[6]
T. Arai, R. Kato, and M. Fujita, "Assessment of operator stress induced by robot collaboration in assembly," CIRP Ann., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 5--8, 2010.
[7]
I. El Makrini et al., "Design and Investigation of Social Robotic Coworkers in Factories I.," Int. J. People-Oriented Program., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19--38, 2016.
[8]
S. A. Elprama, I. El Makrini, B. Vanderborght, and A. Jacobs, "Acceptance of collaborative robots by factory workers?: a pilot study on the importance of social cues of anthropomorphic robots," Robot Hum. Interact. Commun. (ROMAN), 2016 25th IEEE Int. Sympoisium, no. December 2016.
[9]
S. A. Elprama, C. I. C. Jewell, A. Jacobs, I. El Makrini, and B. Vanderborght, "Attitudes of Factory Workers towards Industrial and Collaborative Robots," in Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2017, pp. 113--114.
[10]
A. D. B. Vizzotto, A. M. Oliveira, H. Elkis, Q. Cordeiro, and P. C. Buchain, "Psychosocial Characteristics," in Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine, New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013, pp. 1578--1580.
[11]
M. Van Veldhoven and T. Meijman, "Het meten van psychosociale arbeids-belasting met een vragenlijst: De Vragenlijst Beleving en Beoordeling van de Arbeid (VBBA) [Measuring psychosocial workload with a questionnaire]," Tijdschr. voor Bedrijfs- en Verzek., no. 2, pp. 229--230, 1994.
[12]
C. Bröhl, J. Nelles, C. Brandl, A. Mertens, and C. M. Schlick, "TAM Reloaded: A Technology Acceptance Model for Human-Robot Cooperation in Production Systems," in Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 617, Springer Verlag, 2016, pp. 97--103.
[13]
M. Rueben, S. A. Elprama, D. Chrysostomou, and A. Jacobs, "Introduction to (Re)Using Questionnaires in Human-Robot Interaction Research," in Human-Robot Interaction, Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 125--144.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Literature Review on Safety Perception and Trust during Human–Robot Interaction with Autonomous Mobile Robots That Apply to Industrial EnvironmentsIISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors10.1080/24725838.2023.228353712:1-2(6-27)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Vision-Based Mobile Collaborative Robot Incorporating a Multicamera Localization SystemIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2023.330030123:18(21853-21861)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Human–Robot Interaction in Industrial Settings: Perception of Multiple Participants at a Crossroad Intersection Scenario with Different Courtesy CuesRobotics10.3390/robotics1103005911:3(59)Online publication date: 13-May-2022

Index Terms

  1. Psychosocial Impact of Collaborating with an Autonomous Mobile Robot: Results of an Exploratory Case Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HRI '21 Companion: Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    March 2021
    756 pages
    ISBN:9781450382908
    DOI:10.1145/3434074
    • General Chairs:
    • Cindy Bethel,
    • Ana Paiva,
    • Program Chairs:
    • Elizabeth Broadbent,
    • David Feil-Seifer,
    • Daniel Szafir
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 March 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. autonomous mobile robots
    2. human robot interaction
    3. warehouse automation

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    HRI '21
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Literature Review on Safety Perception and Trust during Human–Robot Interaction with Autonomous Mobile Robots That Apply to Industrial EnvironmentsIISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors10.1080/24725838.2023.228353712:1-2(6-27)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Vision-Based Mobile Collaborative Robot Incorporating a Multicamera Localization SystemIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2023.330030123:18(21853-21861)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2023
    • (2022)Human–Robot Interaction in Industrial Settings: Perception of Multiple Participants at a Crossroad Intersection Scenario with Different Courtesy CuesRobotics10.3390/robotics1103005911:3(59)Online publication date: 13-May-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media