research-article

IBRDM: An Intelligent Framework for Brain Tumor Classification Using Radiomics- and DWT-based Fusion of MRI Sequences

Authors:

Harkirat Singh Arora,

Balasubramanian RamanAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), Volume 22, Issue 1

Article No.: 9, Pages 1 - 30

https://doi.org/10.1145/3434775

Published: 28 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Brain tumors are one of the critical malignant neurological cancers with the highest number of deaths and injuries worldwide. They are categorized into two major classes, high-grade glioma (HGG) and low-grade glioma (LGG), with HGG being more aggressive and malignant, whereas LGG tumors are less aggressive, but if left untreated, they get converted to HGG. Thus, the classification of brain tumors into the corresponding grade is a crucial task, especially for making decisions related to treatment. Motivated by the importance of such critical threats to humans, we propose a novel framework for brain tumor classification using discrete wavelet transform-based fusion of MRI sequences and Radiomics feature extraction. We utilized the Brain Tumor Segmentation 2018 challenge training dataset for the performance evaluation of our approach, and we extract features from three regions of interest derived using a combination of several tumor regions. We used wrapper method-based feature selection techniques for selecting a significant set of features and utilize various machine learning classifiers, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Extra Randomized Tree for training the model. For proper validation of our approach, we adopt the five-fold cross-validation technique. We achieved state-of-the-art performance considering several performance metrics, 〈Acc, Sens, Spec, F1-score, MCC, AUC 〉 ≡ 〈 98.60%, 99.05%, 97.33%, 99.05%, 96.42%, 98.19% 〉, where Acc, Sens, Spec, F1-score, MCC, and AUC represents the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, Matthews correlation coefficient, and area-under-the-curve, respectively. We believe our proposed approach will play a crucial role in the planning of clinical treatment and guidelines before surgery.

References

[1]

WebMD. ([n. d.]). Retrieved from https://www.webmd.com/brain/picture-of-the-brain#2.

[2]

Haolun Li, Chi-Man Pun, Feng Xu, Longsheng Pan, Rui Zong, Hao Gao, and Huimin Lu. 2021. Hybrid feature selection algorithm based on discrete artificial bee colony for parkinson diagnosis. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 21, 3 (2021), 1–22.

Digital Library

[3]

Ya Zhang, Ao Li, Chen Peng, and Minghui Wang. 2016. Improve glioblastoma multiforme prognosis prediction by using feature selection and multiple kernel learning. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 13, 5 (2016), 825–835.

Digital Library

[4]

Chun-Hou Zheng, Lei Zhang, To-Yee Ng, Chi Keung Shiu, and De-Shuang Huang. 2011. Metasample-based sparse representation for tumor classification. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 8, 5 (2011), 1273–1282.

Digital Library

[5]

Nicki R. Colledge, Brian R. Walker, Stuart H. Ralston, et al. 2010. Davidson’s Principles and Practice of Medicine. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier Edinburgh/New York.

[6]

Freddie Bray, Jacques Ferlay, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Rebecca L. Siegel, Lindsey A. Torre, and Ahmedin Jemal. 2018. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 68, 6 (2018), 394–424.

[7]

Cancer.Net Editorial Board [n.d.]. Brain Tumor: Statistics.Retrieved from https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/brain-tumor/statistics.

[8]

American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Retrieved from https://www.aans.org/en/Patients/Neurosurgical-Conditions-and-Treatments/Brain-Tumors.

[9]

Patrick Y. Wen and Santosh Kesari. 2008. Malignant gliomas in adults. New England J. Med. 359, 5 (2008), 492–507.

[10]

David N. Louis, Arie Perry, Guido Reifenberger, Andreas Von Deimling, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Webster K. Cavenee, Hiroko Ohgaki, Otmar D. Wiestler, Paul Kleihues, and David W. Ellison. 2016. The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 6 (2016), 803–820.

[11]

Cancer.Net Editorial Board. Brain Tumor.[n. d.]. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/brain-tumor.

[12]

David N. Louis, Hiroko Ohgaki, Otmar D. Wiestler, Webster K. Cavenee, Peter C. Burger, Anne Jouvet, Bernd W. Scheithauer, and Paul Kleihues. 2007. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 114, 2 (2007), 97–109.

[13]

Antonio Omuro and Lisa M. DeAngelis. 2013. Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: A clinical review. JAMA. 310, 17 (2013), 1842–1850.

[14]

Pieter Wesseling and David Capper. 2018. WHO 2016 classification of gliomas. Neuropa. Appl. Neurob. 44, 2 (2018), 139–150.

[15]

Xi-Xun Qi, Da-Fa Shi, Si-Xie Ren, Su-Ya Zhang, Long Li, Qing-Chang Li, and Li-Ming Guan. 2018. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery. Eur. Radiol. 28, 4 (2018), 1748–1755.

[16]

Robert M. Haralick, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, and Its’ Hak Dinstein. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. SMC-3, 6 (1973), 610–621.

[17]

Patrik Brynolfsson, David Nilsson, Roger Henriksson, Jón Hauksson, Mikael Karlsson, Anders Garpebring, Richard Birgander, Johan Trygg, Tufve Nyholm, and Thomas Asklund. 2014. ADC texture—An imaging biomarker for high-grade glioma?Med. Phys. 41, 10 (2014), 101903.1–101903.7.

[18]

Young Jin Ryu, Seung Hong Choi, Sang Joon Park, Tae Jin Yun, Ji-Hoon Kim, and Chul-Ho Sohn. 2014. Glioma: Application of whole-tumor texture analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging for the evaluation of tumor heterogeneity. PloS One 9, 9 (2014), e108335.1–e108335.9.

[19]

Hwan-Ho Cho and Hyunjin Park. 2017. Classification of low-grade and high-grade glioma using multi-modal image radiomics features. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC’17). 3081–3084.

[20]

Richard W. Conners and Charles A. Harlow. 1980. A theoretical comparison of texture algorithms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3 (1980), 204–222.

Digital Library

[21]

Fritz Albregtsen et al. 2008. Statistical texture measures computed from gray level co-ocurrence matrices. Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo 5 (2008).

[22]

Changliang Su, Jingjing Jiang, Shun Zhang, Jingjing Shi, Kaibin Xu, Nanxi Shen, Jiaxuan Zhang, Li Li, Lingyun Zhao, Ju Zhang, et al. 2019. Radiomics based on multicontrast/usepackageMRI can precisely differentiate among glioma subtypes and predict tumour-proliferative behaviour. Eur. Radiol. 29, 4 (2019), 1986–1996.

[23]

Robert J. Gillies, Paul E. Kinahan, and Hedvig Hricak. 2015. Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278, 2 (2015), 563–577.

[24]

Jian Wu, Chunfeng Lian, Su Ruan, Thomas R. Mazur, Sasa Mutic, Mark A. Anastasio, Perry W. Grigsby, Pierre Vera, and Hua Li. 2018. Treatment outcome prediction for cancer patients based on radiomics and belief function theory. IEEE Trans. Rad. Plasma Med. Sci. 3, 2 (2018), 216–224.

[25]

Jian Wu, Victor S Sheng, Jing Zhang, Hua Li, Tetiana Dadakova, Christine Leon Swisher, Zhiming Cui, and Pengpeng Zhao. 2020. Multi-label active learning algorithms for image classification: Overview and future promise. ACM Comput. Surveys 53, 2 (2020), 1–35.

Digital Library

[26]

Philippe Lambin, Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez, Ralph Leijenaar, Sara Carvalho, Ruud G. P. M. Van Stiphout, Patrick Granton, Catharina M. L. Zegers, Robert Gillies, Ronald Boellard, André Dekker et al. 2012. Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur. J. Cancer 48, 4 (2012), 441–446.

[27]

E. J. Limkin, Roger Sun, Laurent Dercle, E. I. Zacharaki, Charlotte Robert, Sylvain Reuzé, Antoine Schernberg, Nikos Paragios, Eric Deutsch, and Charles Ferté. 2017. Promises and challenges for the implementation of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in oncology. Ann. Oncol. 28, 6 (2017), 1191–1206.

[28]

Hwan-Ho Cho, Seung-Hak Lee, Jonghoon Kim, and Hyunjin Park. 2018. Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis. Peer J. 6 (2018), e5982.

[29]

Pan Sun, Defeng Wang, Vincent Ct Mok, and Lin Shi. 2019. Comparison of feature selection methods and machine learning classifiers for radiomics analysis in glioma grading. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 102010–102020.

[30]

Yaping Wu, Huihui Hao, Jie Li, Weiguo Wu, Yusong Lin, and Meiyun Wang. 2019. Four-sequence maximum entropy discrimination algorithm for glioma grading. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 52246–52256.

[31]

Zahraa A. Al-Saffar and Tülay Yildirim. 2020. A novel approach to improving brain image classification using mutual information-accelerated singular value decomposition. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 52575–52587.

[32]

Kenneth Clark, Bruce Vendt, Kirk Smith, John Freymann, Justin Kirby, Paul Koppel, Stephen Moore, Stanley Phillips, David Maffitt, Michael Pringle et al. 2013. The cancer imaging archive (TCIA): Maintaining and operating a public information repository. J. Dig. Imag. 26, 6 (2013), 1045–1057.

[33]

Yudong Zhang, Zhengchao Dong, Shuihua Wang, Genlin Ji, and Jiquan Yang. 2015. Preclinical diagnosis of magnetic resonance (MR) brain images via discrete wavelet packet transform with Tsallis entropy and generalized eigenvalue proximal support vector machine (GEPSVM). Entropy 17, 4 (2015), 1795–1813.

[34]

Tanvi Gupta, Tapan K. Gandhi, R. K. Gupta, and B. K. Panigrahi. 2020. Classification of patients with tumor using MR FLAIR images. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 139 (2020), 112–117.

[35]

R. Kumar, A. Gupta, H. S. Arora, G. N. Pandian, and B. Raman. 2020. CGHF: A computational decision support system for glioma classification using hybrid radiomics-and stationary wavelet-based features. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 79440–79458.

[36]

A. Ratna Raju, P. Suresh, and R. Rajeswara Rao. 2018. Bayesian HCS-based multi-SVNN: A classification approach for brain tumor segmentation and classification using bayesian fuzzy clustering. Biocybernet. Biomed. Eng. 38, 3 (2018), 646–660.

[37]

Abdu Gumaei, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, Md Rafiul Hassan, Abdulhameed Alelaiwi, and Giancarlo Fortino. 2019. A hybrid feature extraction method with regularized extreme learning machine for brain tumor classification. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 36266–36273.

[38]

Jun Cheng. 2017. Brain tumor dataset. Figshare. Dataset. (2017).

[39]

Jun Cheng, Wei Yang, Meiyan Huang, Wei Huang, Jun Jiang, Yujia Zhou, Ru Yang, Jie Zhao, Yanqiu Feng, Qianjin Feng et al. 2016. Retrieval of brain tumors by adaptive spatial pooling and fisher vector representation. PloS One 11, 6 (2016), e0157112.

[40]

Bo Yin, Chao Wang, and Francis Abza. 2020. New brain tumor classification method based on an improved version of whale optimization algorithm. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 56 (2020), 101728.

[41]

Fusun Citak-Er, Zeynep Firat, Ilhami Kovanlikaya, Ugur Ture, and Esin Ozturk-Isik. 2018. Machine-learning in grading of gliomas based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. Comput. Biol. Med. 99 (2018), 154–160.

[42]

Shai Shrot, Moshe Salhov, Nir Dvorski, Eli Konen, Amir Averbuch, and Chen Hoffmann. 2019. Application of MR morphologic, diffusion tensor, and perfusion imaging in the classification of brain tumors using machine learning scheme. Neuroradiology 61, 7 (2019), 757–765.

[43]

Rishav Singh, Tanveer Ahmed, Abhinav Kumar, Amit Kumar Singh, Anil K Pandey, and Sanjay Kumar Singh. 2020. Imbalanced breast cancer classification using transfer learning. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 18, 1 (2020), 83–93.

[44]

Abhinav Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Sonal Saxena, Amit Kumar Singh, Sameer Shrivastava, K. Lakshmanan, Neeraj Kumar, and Raj Kumar Singh. 2020. CoMHisP: A novel feature extractor for histopathological image classification based on fuzzy SVM with within-class relative density. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 29, 1 (2020), 103–117.

Digital Library

[45]

Bjoern H. Menze et al. 2014. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 34, 10 (2014), 1993–2024.

[46]

Spyridon Bakas, Hamed Akbari, Aristeidis Sotiras, Michel Bilello, Martin Rozycki, Justin S. Kirby, John B. Freymann, Keyvan Farahani, and Christos Davatzikos. 2017. Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Sci. Data 4 (2017), article no. 170117.

[47]

Spyridon Bakas et al. 2018. Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge. Retrieved from https://ArXiv:1811.02629.

[48]

El-Sayed Ahmed El-Dahshan, Tamer Hosny, and Abdel-Badeeh M Salem. 2010. Hybrid intelligent techniques for MRI brain images classification. Digital Signal Process. 20, 2 (2010), 433–441.

Digital Library

[49]

Djamel Bouchaffra and Abbes Amira. 2008. Structural hidden Markov models for biometrics: Fusion of face and fingerprint. Pattern Recogn. 41, 3 (2008), 852–867.

Digital Library

[50]

Ali N. Akansu, Paul A. Haddad, Richard A. Haddad, and Paul R. Haddad. 2001. Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: Transforms, Subbands, and Wavelets. Academic press.

Digital Library

[51]

José Raniery Ferreira Junior, Marcel Koenigkam-Santos, Federico Enrique Garcia Cipriano, Alexandre Todorovic Fabro, and Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques. 2018. Radiomics-based features for pattern recognition of lung cancer histopathology and metastases. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 159 (2018), 23–30.

[52]

Stephen S. F. Yip, Ying Liu, Chintan Parmar, Qian Li, Shichang Liu, Fangyuan Qu, Zhaoxiang Ye, Robert J. Gillies, and Hugo J. W. L. Aerts. 2017. Associations between radiologist-defined semantic and automatically computed radiomic features in non-small cell lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 7, 1 (2017), 1–11.

[53]

William E. Lorensen and Harvey E. Cline. 1987. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. In ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, Vol. 21. 163–169.

Digital Library

[54]

Joost J. M. Van Griethuysen et al. 2017. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 77, 21 (2017), e104–e107.

[55]

Hugo J. W. L. Aerts et al. 2014. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nature Commun. 5 (2014), Article no. 4006.

[56]

Lifei Zhang, David V. Fried, Xenia J. Fave, Luke A. Hunter, Jinzhong Yang, and Laurence E. Court. 2015. IBEX: An open infrastructure software platform to facilitate collaborative work in radiomics. Med. Phys. 42, 3 (2015), 1341–1353.

[57]

David Legland, Kiên Kiêu, and Marie-Françoise Devaux. 2007. Computation of minkowski measures on 2D and 3D binary images. Image Anal. Stereo. 26, 2 (2007), 83–92.

[58]

Sebastian Echegaray, Olivier Gevaert, Rajesh Shah, Aya Kamaya, John Louie, Nishita Kothary, and Sandy Napel. 2015. Core samples for radiomics features that are insensitive to tumor segmentation: Method and pilot study using CT images of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Med. Imag. 2, 4 (2015), 041011.1–041011.10.

[59]

Robert M. Haralick and Linda G. Shapiro. 1992. Computer and Robot Vision, Vol. 1. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 28–48.

Digital Library

[60]

Moses Amadasun and Robert King. 1989. Textural features corresponding to textural properties. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 19, 5 (1989), 1264–1274.

[61]

Chengjun Sun and William G. Wee. 1983. Neighboring gray level dependence matrix for texture classification. Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 23, 3 (1983), 341–352.

[62]

M. M. Galloway. 1975. Texture classification using gray level run length. Comp. Graph. Ima. Proce. 4, 2 (1975), 172–179.

[63]

A. Chu, Chandra M. Sehgal, and James F. Greenleaf. 1990. Use of gray value distribution of run lengths for texture analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 11, 6 (1990), 415–419.

Digital Library

[64]

Dong-Hui Xu, Arati S. Kurani, Jacob D. Furst, and Daniela S. Raicu. 2004. Run-length encoding for volumetric texture. Heart 27, 25 (2004), 452–458.

[65]

Xiaoou Tang. 1998. Texture information in run-length matrices. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7, 11 (1998), 1602–1609.

Digital Library

[66]

Guillaume Thibault, Bernard Fertil, Claire Navarro, Sandrine Pereira, Pierre Cau, Nicolas Levy, Jean Sequeira, and Jean-Luc Mari. 2013. Shape and texture indexes application to cell nuclei classification. Int. J. Patt. Recogn. Art. Intell. 27, 01 (2013), 1357002.1–1357002.23.

[67]

James Kennedy and Russell Eberhart. 1995. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN’95), Vol. 4. IEEE, 1942–1948.

[68]

Riccardo Poli, James Kennedy, and Tim Blackwell. 2007. Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intell. 1, 1 (2007), 33–57.

[69]

Darrell Whitley. 1994. A genetic algorithm tutorial. Stat. Comput. 4, 2 (1994), 65–85.

[70]

Georges R. Harik, Fernando G. Lobo, and David E. Goldberg. 1999. The compact genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Evolution. Comput. 3, 4 (1999), 287–297.

Digital Library

[71]

Marco Dorigo, Mauro Birattari, and Thomas Stutzle. 2006. Ant colony optimization. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 1, 4 (2006), 28–39.

Digital Library

[72]

Tarfa Hamed, Rozita Dara, and Stefan C. Kremer. 2014. An accurate, fast embedded feature selection for SVMS. In 13th IEEE Int. Conf. Mach. Lear. App. IEEE, 135–140.

Digital Library

[73]

Isabelle Guyon, Jason Weston, Stephen Barnhill, and Vladimir Vapnik. 2002. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 46, 1-3 (2002), 389–422.

Digital Library

[74]

Lin-Kai Luo, Deng-Feng Huang, Ling-Jun Ye, Qi-Feng Zhou, Gui-Fang Shao, and Hong Peng. 2010. Improving the computational efficiency of recursive cluster elimination for gene selection. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 8, 1 (2010), 122–129.

Digital Library

[75]

David W. Hosmer and Stanley Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

[76]

Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik. 1995. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 3 (1995), 273–297.

Digital Library

[77]

Chih-Chung Chang and Chih-Jen Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 3 (2011), 1–27.

Digital Library

[78]

Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 1 (2001), 5–32.

Digital Library

[79]

J. Ross Quinlan. 1986. Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1, 1 (1986), 81–106.

[80]

Pierre Geurts, Damien Ernst, and Louis Wehenkel. 2006. Extremely randomized trees. Mach. Learn. 63, 1 (2006), 3–42.

Digital Library

[81]

Rich Caruana, Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil, Geoff Crew, and Alex Ksikes. 2004. Ensemble selection from libraries of models. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning. 18.

Digital Library

[82]

Brian W. Matthews. 1975. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Struct. 405, 2 (1975), 442–451.

[83]

Mark H. Zweig and Gregory Campbell. 1993. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem. 39, 4 (1993), 561–577.

[84]

A. Gupta, R. Kumar, H. Singh Arora, and B. Raman. 2020. MIFH: A machine intelligence framework for heart disease diagnosis. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 14659–14674.

[85]

James A. Hanley and Barbara J. McNeil. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology 143, 1 (1982), 29–36.

Cited By

Diao ZJiang H(2024)A multi-instance tumor subtype classification method for small PET datasets using RA-DL attention module guided deep feature extraction with radiomics featuresComputers in Biology and Medicine10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108461174(108461)Online publication date: May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108461
Verma AShivhare SSingh SKumar NNayyar A(2024)Comprehensive Review on MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Study from 2017 OnwardsArchives of Computational Methods in Engineering10.1007/s11831-024-10128-031:8(4805-4851)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10128-0
Perniciano ALoddo ADi Ruberto CPes B(2024)Insights into radiomics: impact of feature selection and classificationMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-20388-4Online publication date: 15-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20388-4
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

IBRDM: An Intelligent Framework for Brain Tumor Classification Using Radiomics- and DWT-based Fusion of MRI Sequences
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Machine learning
    1. Machine learning algorithms
      1. Feature selection

Recommendations

Brain tumour classification in MRI: self-improved osprey optimised U-Net model for segmentation and fused deepnet model-based classification

Tumours rank as the tenth most prevalent global cause of death, with brain tumours representing a particularly serious medical condition stemming from the uncontrolled proliferation of brain cells, disrupting normal brain functions. The causes of brain ...
MRI-based classification of brain tumor type and grade using SVM-RFE
ISBI'09: Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE international conference on Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro

The objective of this study is to investigate the use of pattern classification methods for distinguishing different types of brain tumors, such as primary gliomas from metastases, and also for grading of gliomas. A computer-assisted classification ...
MRI-based radiomics distinguish different pathological types of hepatocellular carcinoma
Abstract Object
To distinguish combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC) before operation using MRI radiomics.
Method
This study ...
Highlights
- MRI radiomics combined with machine learning can distinguish cHCC-CC, HCC and CC.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology Volume 22, Issue 1

February 2022

717 pages

ISSN:1533-5399

EISSN:1557-6051

DOI:10.1145/3483347

Editor:
Ling Liu
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 September 2021

Accepted: 01 November 2020

Revised: 01 October 2020

Received: 01 May 2020

Published in TOIT Volume 22, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Refereed

Funding Sources

Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India
Visvesvaraya Ph.D. Scheme for Electronics & IT

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

8
Total Citations
View Citations
290
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)26
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Diao ZJiang H(2024)A multi-instance tumor subtype classification method for small PET datasets using RA-DL attention module guided deep feature extraction with radiomics featuresComputers in Biology and Medicine10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108461174(108461)Online publication date: May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108461
Verma AShivhare SSingh SKumar NNayyar A(2024)Comprehensive Review on MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Study from 2017 OnwardsArchives of Computational Methods in Engineering10.1007/s11831-024-10128-031:8(4805-4851)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10128-0
Perniciano ALoddo ADi Ruberto CPes B(2024)Insights into radiomics: impact of feature selection and classificationMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-20388-4Online publication date: 15-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20388-4
Tabassum MSuman ASuero Molina EPan EDi Ieva ALiu S(2023)Radiomics and Machine Learning in Brain Tumors and Their Habitat: A Systematic ReviewCancers10.3390/cancers1515384515:15(3845)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153845
Xie CZhang JZhu YXiong BWang G(2023)How to improve the success of bank telemarketing? Prediction and interpretability analysis based on machine learningComputers and Industrial Engineering10.1016/j.cie.2022.108874175:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108874
Rana ADumka ASingh RPanda MPriyadarshi N(2022)A Computerized Analysis with Machine Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease: Past Studies and Future PerspectivesDiagnostics10.3390/diagnostics1211270812:11(2708)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112708
Lima AMridha MDas SKabir MIslam MWatanobe Y(2022)A Comprehensive Survey on the Detection, Classification, and Challenges of Neurological DisordersBiology10.3390/biology1103046911:3(469)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11030469
Tanveer MRashid AKumar RBalasubramanian R(2022)Parkinson’s disease diagnosis using neural networksInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2022.10290959:3Online publication date: 1-May-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102909

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents