skip to main content
10.1145/3434780.3436564acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Systems Thinking Approach to Reflective Practice in Blogs: Implications on Social-Emotional Learning and Resilience Building

Published:22 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the present paper, we propose a model for reflective practice in blogs based on Systems Thinking aiming to promote social-emotional learning, and we discuss its theoretical underpinnings. Reflective blogging can be an invaluable tool for peer learning and professional development, particularly in appreciative environments where people feel safe to share their experiences. The proposed model introduces Systems Thinking as an effective way to facilitate group reflective practice for social-emotional learning and resilience building in a blended learning environment. Participants practice how to acknowledge different perspectives and how to integrate them into a coherent group narrative, the collective story of their community. Systems thinking entails a shift of focus from the parts to the relationships between and treats any group of participants as a living network, a learning rhizome in the becoming. In this view, collective intelligence rises as an emergent system property. We provide the case of a recent implementation of the proposed model to reflect and elaborate further on practical aspects of the approach, such as how to cultivate reflective writing among the participants, how to synthesize a group meta-narrative, how to evaluate individual contributions, and how to nurture a learning organization. The aim is to present a concise and authentic account of this approach so as to enable other educators and practitioners to get inspiration, make necessary adaptations, and utilize it in their own practice.

References

  1. Arnold, M.B. 1962. Story Sequence Analysis: A New Method of Measuring Motivation and Predicting Achievement. Columbia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Beale, R. 2007. Blogs, reflective practice and student-centered learning. Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI... but not as we know it - Volume 2 (University of Lancaster, United Kingdom, 2007), 3–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Berkes, F. and Ross, H. 2013. Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach. Society & Natural Resources. 26, 1 (Jan. 2013), 5–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.736605.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bouldin, A.S. 2006. “Blogging” About Course Concepts: Using Technology for Reflective Journaling in a Communications Class. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 70, 4 (Sep. 2006), 84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brackett, M.A. 2019. RULER: A Theory-Driven, Systemic Approach to Social, Emotional, and Academic Learning. Educational Psychologist. 54, 3 (Jul. 2019), 144–161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1614447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brailas, A. 2016. Design and implementation of a web-based system to support collective reflective practice. International Journal of Designs for Learning. 7, 3 (2016), 95–104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v7i3.18864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Brailas, A. 2020. Designed to allow for Emergence: A Learning Rhizome. Research Catalogue. (Oct. 2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.22501/rc.782366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brailas, A. 2017. Experiential Learning in Action: A Collaborative Inquiry. The Qualitative Report. 22, 1 (2017), 271–288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Brailas, A. 2019. Group work, reflective practice and blogging in academic teaching: Developing peer learning networks. PsyArxiv. (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/stjv2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Brailas, A. 2017. Teaching to emerge: Toward a bottom-up pedagogy. Cogent Education. 4, 1 (Jan. 2017), 1377506. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1377506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Byrne, D. 2014. Thoughts on a Pedagogy OF complexity. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education. 11, 2 (2014), 40–50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Capra, F. 2010. Life and leadership for a sustainable community: Lessons on how to sustain life by building and nurturing community. Center For Ecoliteracy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Capra, F. 2003. The Hidden Connections: A Science for Sustainable Living. Flamingo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Capra, F. and Luisi, P.L. 2014. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, B. 2015. Engaging Minds: Cultures of Education and Practices of Teaching. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Feldman, D.P. 2012. Chaos and Fractals: An Elementary Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fletcher, D. and Sarkar, M. 2013. Psychological Resilience: A Review and Critique of Definitions, Concepts, and Theory. European Psychologist. 18, 1 (Jan. 2013), 12–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. von Foerster, H. and von Foerster, H. 2003. Notes on an Epistemology for Living Things. Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition. Springer New York. 247–259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Goleman, D. and Senge, P. 2014. The Triple Focus: A New Approach to Education. More Than Sound Productions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Holquist, M. 2002. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kajder, S. and Parkes, K. 2012. Examining Preservice Teachers’ Reflective Practice within and across Multimodal Writing Environments. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 20, 3 (2012), 229–249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kauffman, S. 1996. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenny, R.M. 2008. The Whole is Greater: Reflective Practice, Human Development and Fields of Consciousness and Collaborative Creativity. World Futures. 64, 8 (Nov. 2008), 590–630. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02604020802392195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Killeavy, M. and Moloney, A. 2010. Reflection in a social space: Can blogging support reflective practice for beginning teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education. 26, 4 (May 2010), 1070–1076. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ladyshewsky, R.K. and Gardner, P. 2008. Peer assisted learning and blogging: A strategy to promote reflective practice during clinical fieldwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 24, 3 (May 2008). DOI:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Levine, T.C. 2014. The Use of Blogging in Tertiary Healthcare Educational Settings to Enhance Reflective Learning in Nursing Leadership: Journal for Nurses in Professional Development. 30, 6 (2014), 287–295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Low, B. 2002. Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management? Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. C. Folke , eds. Cambridge University Press. 83–114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. McAdam, E. and Lang, P. 2003. Working in the Worlds of Children: Growing, Schools, Families, Communities Through Imagining. The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work. 2003, (2003), 48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. McAdam, E. and Mirza, K.A.H. 2009. Drugs, hopes and dreams: appreciative inquiry with marginalized young people using drugs and alcohol. Journal of Family Therapy. 31, 2 (2009), 175–193. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2009.00461.x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Moon, J.A. 2006. Learning journals: a handbook for reflective practice and professional development. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Moon, J.A. 2010. Using story: in higher education and professional development. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Osman, G. and Koh, J.H.L. 2013. Understanding management students’ reflective practice through blogging. The Internet and Higher Education. 16, (Jan. 2013), 23–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.07.001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Papadopoulos, R.K. 1999. Storied community as secure base: Rersponse to the paper by Nancy Caro Hollander “Exile: Paradoxes of loss and creativity.” British Journal of Psychotherapy. 15, 3 (Mar. 1999), 322–332. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.1999.tb00456.x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Polemi-Todoulou, M. 2018. Systemic-Dialectic- Multilevel-Multifocal Approach. Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. J. Lebow , eds. Springer International Publishing. 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Polemi-Todoulou, M. 2018. Vassiliou, George and Vasso. Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. J. Lebow , eds. Springer International Publishing. 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Polychroni, K. 2008. Actualizing Inner Voices and the Group Process: Experiential Training in Personal Development. Human Systems: The Journal of Therapy, Consultation & Training. 19, 1 (2008), 26–43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. 1997. The End of Certainty. Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Rheingold, H. and Weeks, A. 2012. Net Smart: How to Thrive Online. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Salichos, P. and Polychroni, K. 2018. Handbook of Training in the Systemic-Dialectic Approach to Working with Youth at Risk. Athenian Institute of Anthropos (AIA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Schön, D.A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Smidt, A. 2018. Transformative and troublesome: reflective blogging for professional learning about university teaching. Reflective Practice. 19, 4 (Jul. 2018), 474–489. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1525345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Sumara, D.J. and Davis, B. 1997. Enactivist theory and community learning: Toward a complexified understanding of action research. Educational Action Research. 5, (1997), 422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Vassiliou, G.A. and Vassiliou, V.G. 1985. Developing Jointly with the Family System the Therapeutic Process by Using Analogic Communication. Psychiatry the State of the Art: Volume 4 Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine. P. Pichot , eds. Springer US. 85–88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. A Systems Thinking Approach to Reflective Practice in Blogs: Implications on Social-Emotional Learning and Resilience Building

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
      October 2020
      1084 pages
      ISBN:9781450388504
      DOI:10.1145/3434780

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 January 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format