skip to main content
10.1145/3434780.3436573acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pedagogical and user interface usability evaluation of an educational mobile app that promotes visual literacy

Published:22 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visual is a mobile app designed and developed to use as a resource to support a blended learning course of visual literacy for in-service teachers. The main goal of the Visual app is to help participants to achieve better comprehension about the theoretical content by doing the app activities. Hence, as a personal learning environment, the quality of this resource should be evaluated to identify flaws and to improve the educational content and the interface if necessary. In consequence, users will learn with the app and do not waste time learning how to use it or doing activities without an educational purpose.

This paper presents the results of the pedagogical and user interface usability evaluation of the Visual mobile app. Five judges were asked to assess the app by using a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of M-learning apps. This instrument assesses both pedagogical and user interface usability. Results confirm that the Visual app current version works as a minimum viable product, so it reaches the learning objectives set and has a user interface that makes easy the navigation and the usage.

References

  1. Box, C.A. and Cochenour, J. 1995. Visual Literacy: What Do Prospective Teachers Need To Know? Imagery and Visual Literacy: Selected Readings from the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association (26th, Tempe, Arizona, October 12-16, 1994). (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brantes, F.J. 2013. Mobile Learning: Definition, Uses and Challenges. Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Applications: Smartphones, Skype and Texting Technologies. L. A. Wankel and P. Blessinger, eds. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 47–82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brion, C. 2019. Keeping the learning going: using mobile technology to enhance learning transfer. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. 18, 3 (Oct. 2019), 225–240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-018-09243-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brumberger, E. 2011. Visual Literacy and the Digital Native: An Examination of the MillennialLearner. Journal of Visual Literacy. 30, 1 (Jan. 2011), 19–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674683.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Burden, K. and Kearney, M. 2016. Conceptualising Authentic Mobile Learning. Mobile Learning Design: Theories and Application. D. Churchill , eds. Springer. 27–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Churchill, D. 2016. Framework for Designing Mobile Learning Environments. Mobile Learning Design: Theories and Application. D. Churchill , eds. Springer Singapore. 3–25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cisco Annual Internet Report - Cisco Annual Internet Report (2018–2023) White Paper: 2020. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/executive-perspectives/annual-internet-report/white-paper-c11-741490.html. Accessed: 2020-09-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cremades, R. 2017. Validación de un instrumento para el análisis y evaluación de webs de bibliotecas escolares mediante el acuerdo interjueces. Investigación bibliotecológica. 31, 71 (Apr. 2017), 127–149. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2017.71.57813.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. David, A. and Glore, P. 2010. The Impact of Design and Aesthetics on Usability, Credibility, and Learning in an Online Environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 13, 4 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Demmans Epp, C. and Phirangee, K. 2019. Exploring mobile tool integration: Design activities carefully or students may not learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 59, (Oct. 2019), 101791. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101791.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dousay, T.A. and Branch, R.M. 2013. Visual Competency. Encyclopedia of Terminology for Educational Communications and Technology. R.C. Richey, ed. Springer International Publishing. 319–321.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Emery, L. and Flood, A. 2019. Visual literacy. More than words can say. A view of literacy through the arts. J. Dyson, ed. National Advocates for Arts Education. 18–32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Enríquez, J.G. and Casas, S.I. 2014. Usabilidad en aplicaciones móviles. Informes Científicos - Técnicos UNPA. 5, 2 (Jun. 2014), 25–47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gómez Domingo, M. and Badia Garganté, A. 2016. Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers’ perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications’ use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior. 56, (Mar. 2016), 21–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hattwig, D. 2013. Visual Literacy Standards in Higher Education: New Opportunities for Libraries and Student Learning. portal: Libraries and the Academy. 13, 1 (Feb. 2013), 61–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2013.0008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Huilcapi-Collantes, C. 2019. A Mobile App for Developing Visual Literacy on In-Service Teachers. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (New York, NY, USA, 2019), 642–647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Huilcapi-Collantes, C. 2020. The Effect of a Blended Learning Course of Visual Literacy for In-service Teachers. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. 19, (Apr. 2020), 131–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.28945/4533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Klimova, B. 2019. Impact of Mobile Learning on Students’ Achievement Results. Education Sciences. 9, 2 (Jun. 2019), 90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020090.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lindsay, L. 2016. Transformation of teacher practice using mobile technology with one-to-one classes: M-learning pedagogical approaches. British Journal of Educational Technology. 47, 5 (2016), 883–892. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Matusiak, K. 2019. Visual Literacy in Practice: Use of Images in Students’ Academic Work. College & Research Libraries. 80, 1 (2019), 123–139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Navarro Cota, C.X. 2016. Framework para evaluar la usabilidad sistemas M-Learning: un enfoque tecnológico y pedagógico. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nuland, S.E.V. and Rogers, K.A. 2016. The anatomy of E-Learning tools: Does software usability influence learning outcomes? Anatomical Sciences Education. 9, 4 (2016), 378–390. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1589.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Scholtz, D. 2019. Visual and non-literal representations as academic literacy modalities. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. 37, 2 (Sep. 2019), 105–118. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2019.1617173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Schuh, G. 2018. Agile Prototyping for technical systems–Towards an adaption of the Minimum Viable Product principle. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th-17th August 2018. P. Ekströmer , eds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sutopo, H. and Pamungkas, W. 2017. Developing Mathematics Mobile Game to Enhance Learning for Children. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC) (Jul. 2017), 191–197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. UNESCO 2017. Supporting teachers with mobile technology: lessons drawn from UNESCO projects in Mexico, Nigeria, Senegal and Pakistan. UNESCO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Usability. What is usability? https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/usability. Accessed: 2020-08-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Pedagogical and user interface usability evaluation of an educational mobile app that promotes visual literacy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
      October 2020
      1084 pages
      ISBN:9781450388504
      DOI:10.1145/3434780

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 January 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format