skip to main content
10.1145/3434780.3436623acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

School effectiveness and PISA tests. Factors of school success

Published:22 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The academic performance's assessment has always been a topic of great interest in the field of educational research. For this reason, for some decades now, different international organisations have been trying to measure academic performance in order to adjust educational policies in the search for improved performance and school efficiency.

One of the international bodies that has devoted a great deal of time and effort to the assessment of academic performance has been the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) with the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), aimed at evaluating the acquisition of key competences by 15-year-old students.

This thesis is proposed with the objective of generating a common framework of best practices in education related to the effectiveness of schools at an international level based on the analysis of the results obtained by students in the PISA 2018 tests. To this end, we will apply a mixed model integrating a quantitative approach of multilevel analysis and a qualitative approach. The quantitative approach will help us to detect those aspects that have the greatest influence on school performance, by developing a statistical model for each of the key competences measured in PISA. In addition, we will seek to highlight those contextual factors associated with school effectiveness by going deeper through the collection of qualitative data and their analysis.

We include here the first results regarding the factors associated with academic performance based on the 2018 PISA report, as well as an approach to the state-of-the-art and the basic concepts on which the thesis will be built.

References

  1. OECD. PISA 2003 Technical Report; 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. OECD. PISA 2000 Technical Report; 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. OECD. PISA 2006 Technical Report; 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. OECD. PISA 2009 Technical Report; 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. OECD. PISA 2012 Technical Report; 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. OECD. PISA 2015 Technical Report; 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gamazo, A.; Olmos Migueláñez, S.; Martínez Abad, F. Factores Asociados al Rendimiento y a La Eficacia Escolar: Un Estudio Basado En Métodos Mixtos a Partir de PISA 2015, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Edel Navarro, R. Factores asociados al rendimiento académico. Rev. Iberoam. Educ.2003, No. Extra 33, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. González Barberá, C.; Caso Niebla, J.; Díaz López, K.; López Ortega, M. Rendimiento académico y factores asociados: aportaciones de algunas evaluaciones a gran escala. Bordón Rev. Pedagog.2012, 64 (2), 51–68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Murillo Torrecilla, F. J.; Martínez Garrido, C. A. ¿Qué nos dice la investigación? Factores de aula eficaz. Educ. Rev. Renov. Pedagógica 2018, No. 266, 4–14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. El estudio de evaluación PIRLS. In PIRLS 2016. Estudio internacional de progreso en comprensión lectora. IEA. Informe español. Versión preliminar, 2017, págs. 11-25; Subdirección General de Documentación y Publicaciones, 2017; pp 11–25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sáez-Rosenkranz, I. Una aproximación a la investigación en educación desde las pruebas estandarizadas. In Historia e identidades culturales, 2014, ISBN 978-989-8525-23-9, págs. 220-228; Universidade do Minho, 2014; pp 220–228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Schleicher, A. Desafíos para PISA. Relieve Rev. ELectrónica Investig. Eval. Educ.2016, 22 (1), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. PISA - PISA https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaenespaol.htm (accessed Sep 14, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en;jsessionid=AGhC2rmacYwl-8SwXtnShYcR.ip-10-240-5-35 (accessed Sep 14, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Secretaría General Técnica. Centro de Publicaciones. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. PISA 2018. Programa para la Evaluación Internacional de los Estudiantes. Informe español https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/pisa-2018-programa-para-la-evaluacion-internacional-de-los-estudiantes-informe-espanol/evaluacion-examenes/23505 (accessed Sep 14, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pajares Box, R. Resultados en España del estudio PISA 2000: conocimientos y destrezas de los alumnos de 15 años; Instituto Nacional de Evaluación y Calidad del Sistema Educativo, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia: Madrid, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cano Sánchez-Serrano, J. S. Rendimiento escolar y sus contextos. Rev. Complut. Educ.2001, 12 (1), 15–80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gamazo, A.; Martínez Abad, F.; Olmos Migueláñez, S.; Rodríguez Conde, M. J. Evaluación de factores relacionados con la eficacia escolar en PISA 2015. Un análisis multinivel. Rev. Educ.2018, No. 379, 56–84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Murillo, F. J. Hacia un Modelo de Eficacia Escolar. Estudio Multinivel sobre los Factores de Eficacia de las Escuelas Españolas. REICE Rev. Iberoam. Sobre Calid. Efic. Cambio En Educ.2008, 6 (1), 4–28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Coleman, J. S.; And Others. Equiality of Educational Opportunity.1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Murillo Torrecilla, F. J. La investigación sobre eficacia escolar en Iberoamérica. Revisión internacional sobre el estado del arte https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/la-investigacion-sobre-eficacia-escolar-en-iberoamerica-revision-internacional-sobre-el-estado-del-arte/educacion/14324 (accessed Sep 15, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lizasoain, L.; Angulo, A.; Azpillaga, V.; Bartau, I.; Damborenea, M. D.; del Frago, R.; ...; Valadez, C. La Eficacia Escolar En Los Centros Del País Vasco. Informe Final 2011-2015; Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto Vasco de Evaluación e Investigación Educativa.: País Vasco, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Creswell, J. W. Revisiting Mixed Methods and Advancing Scientific Practices. Oxf. Handb. Multimethod Mix. Methods Res. Inq.2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.013.39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Greene, J. C. Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? J. Mix. Methods Res.2008, 2 (1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Petticrew, M.; Roberts, H. Why Do We Need Systematic Reviews? In Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008; pp 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887.ch1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Huffman, J. B.; Pankake, A.; Munoz, A. The Tri-Level Model in Action: Site, District, and State Plans for School Accountability in Increasing Student Success. Journal of School Leadership. 2006, pp 569–582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. García Peñalvo, F. J.; García Holgado, A.; Ramírez Montoya, M. S. Track 16: TEEM 2019 Doctoral Consortium. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality; Conde González, M. Á., Rodríguez Sedano, F. J., Fernández Llamas, C., García Peñalvo, F. J., Eds.; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp 920–924. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. García Peñalvo, F. J. Education in Knowledge Society: A New PhD Programme Approach. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’13) (Salamanca, Spain, November 14-15, 2013); García Peñalvo, F. J., Ed.; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp 575–577. https://doi.org/10.1145/2536536.2536624.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
    October 2020
    1084 pages
    ISBN:9781450388504
    DOI:10.1145/3434780

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 January 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format