skip to main content
10.1145/3436369.3436473acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-Target Stance Detection with Multi-Task Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Stance detection plays an important role in the field of online public opinion analysis. The majority of methods of stance detection are for a single target at a once. However, in some situations, multi-target to be analyzed are interrelated, such as several different candidates in an election and different brands of the same product. Detecting the stance of a single target in isolation may lose some information. Some studies have shown that using multi-task learning mechanism for multi-target performs better results than only using a single task. Considering the effectiveness of sentiment features for stance detection in existing researches, we propose a multi-task learning model with sentiment features and at the same time use background lexicon to guide the attention mechanism. We reduce the work of manual labeling and use automatic methods to obtain background knowledge and sentiment information. We use BiLSTM to extract the semantic features and use Multi-Kernel Convolution to get the local features. We use the widely accepted evaluation method and our experiments achieve state-of-the-art results on a benchmark dataset.

References

  1. AlDayel, A. and Magdy, W. 2020. Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trends. (Jun. 2020), 1--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bessi, A. et al. 2016. Homophily and polarization in the age of misinformation. European Physical Journal: Special Topics. 225, 10 (2016), 2047--2059. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2015-50319-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Campos, R. et al. 2020. YAKE! Keyword extraction from single documents using multiple local features. Information Sciences. 509, (Jan. 2020), 257--289. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Darwish, K. et al. 2017. Improved Stance Prediction in a User Similarity Feature Space. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017 (New York, NY, USA, Jul. 2017), 145--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Demszky, D. et al. 2019. Analyzing polarization in social media: Method and application to tweets on 21 mass shootings. NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference. 1, (2019), 2970--3005. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dey, K. et al. 2018. Assessing the Effects of Social Familiarity and Stance Similarity in Interaction Dynamics. Studies in Computational Intelligence. 843--855.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dey, K. et al. 2018. Topical stance detection for twitter: A two-phase LSTM model using attention. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2018), 529--536.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ebrahimi, J. et al. 2016. A joint sentiment-target-stance model for stance classification in tweets. COLING 2016 - 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of COLING 2016: Technical Papers. (2016), 2656--2665.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fréderic Godin 2019. Improving and Interpreting Neural Networks for Word-Level Prediction Tasks in Natural Language Processing. Ghent University, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu, M. and Liu, B. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD '04 (New York, New York, USA, 2004), 168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Li, Y. and Caragea, C. 2019. Multi-Task Stance Detection with Sentiment and Stance Lexicons. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019), 6298--6304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mohammad, S. et al. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016) (Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2016), 31--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Siddiqua, U.A. et al. 2019. Tweet stance detection using an attention based neural ensemble model. NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies -Proceedings of the Conference. 1, (2019), 1868--1873.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sobhani, P. et al. 2017. A Dataset for Multi-Target Stance Detection. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers (Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2017), 551--557.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tian, H. et al. 2020. SKEP: Sentiment Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Stroudsburg, PA, USA, May 2020), 4067--4076.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wang, P. et al. 2009. Using Wikipedia knowledge to improve text classification. Knowledge and Information Systems. 19, 3 (Jun. 2009), 265--281. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-008-0152-4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Wei, P. et al. 2018. Multi-target stance detection via a dynamic memory-augmented network. 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2018. July (2018), 1229--1232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multi-Target Stance Detection with Multi-Task Learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICCPR '20: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition
        October 2020
        552 pages
        ISBN:9781450387835
        DOI:10.1145/3436369

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 January 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader