skip to main content
10.1145/3436369.3437428acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TU-Net: A Precise Network for Tongue Segmentation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Tongue diagnosis is a valuable clinical experience accumulated by Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) through long-term research. In TCM, tongue body reflects the most sensitive indicators of the physiological function and pathological changes, which can help doctors to determine the strategy of syndrome differentiation. Therefore, tongue segmentation is particularly important for intelligent tongue diagnosis. With the development of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in image processing, some popular networks such as U-shape Network (U-Net), Fully Convolutional Networks (FCN) and their variants have been used in medical image segmentation. It is challenging to segment tongue because the pixels of human lips, chin, and other parts in the tongue images are the same as the tongue. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end network called Tongue U-Net (TU-Net) which combines the classical U-Net structure with Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) block, Dense Atrous Convolution (DAC) block and Residual Multi-kernel Pooling (RMP) block. The model is inspired from Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks (SENet) and Context Encoder Network (CE-Net) that can capture more useful information. Applied to a tongue dataset with 300 images, TU-Net performs better than the four segmentation methods (FCN, U-Net, Attention U-Net and U2 -Net) in the evaluation of Dice coefficient, Intersection over Union and Hausdorff distance.

References

  1. Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, and Trevor Darrell. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3431--3440, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Zijun Deng, Xiaowei Hu, Lei Zhu, Xuemiao Xu, Jing Qin, Guoqiang Han, and Pheng-Ann Heng. R3net: Recurrent residual refinement network for saliency detection. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 684--690, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Guanbin Li and Yizhou Yu. Visual saliency detection based on multiscale deep cnn features. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25(11): 5012--5024, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Zhiming Luo, Akshaya Mishra, Andrew Achkar, Justin Eichel, Shaozi Li, and Pierre-Marc Jodoin. Non-local deep features for salient object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6593--6601, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Tiantian Wang, Lihe Zhang, Shuo Wang, Huchuan Lu, Gang Yang, Xiang Ruan, and Ali Borji. Detect globally, refine locally: A novel approach to saliency detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3127--3135, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770--778, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens van der Maaten, and Kilian Q Weinberger. Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2261--2269, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pages 234--241, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jie Hu, Li Shen, Samuel Albanie, Gang Sun, and Enhua Wu. Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7132--7141, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kebin Wu, David Zhang. Robust tongue segmentation by fusing region-based and edge-based approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21): 8027--8038, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hongzhi Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, Kuanquan Wang, and David Zhang. A snake-based approach to automated segmentation of tongue image using polar edge detector. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 16(4): 103--112, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yishuan Huang, Qi Zhang, and Zhanpeng Huang. Tongue Image Segmentation Based on the Sub-Block Region Growing Algorithm. In 2018 5th International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering, pages 578--581, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ozan Oktay, Jo Schlemper, Loic Le Folgoc, Matthew Lee, Mattias Heinrich, Kazunari Misawa, Kensaku Mori, Steven McDonagh, Nils Y Hammerla, Bernhard Kainz, and Ben Glocker, Daniel Rueckert. Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03999, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zaiwang Gu, Jun Cheng, Huazhu Fu, Kang Zhou, Huaying Hao, Yitian Zhao, Tianyang Zhang, Shenghua Gao, and Jiang Liu. CE-Net: Context Encoder Network for 2D Medical Image Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 38(10): 2281--2292, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Xuebin Qin, Zichen Zhang, Chenyang Huang, Masood Dehghan, Osmar R.Zaiane, and Martin Jagersand. U2-Net: going deeper with nested u-structure for salient object detection. Pattern Recognition, 106: 107404, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Huimin Huang, Lanfen Lin, Ruofeng Tong, Hongjie Hu, Qiaowei Zhang, Yutaro Iwamoto, Xianhua Han, Yen-Wei Chen, and Jian Wu. UNet 3+: A Full-Scale Connected UNet for Medical Image Segmentation. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 1055--1059, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Varun Kannadi Valloli and Kinal Mehta. W-Net: Reinforced U-Net for Density Map Estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11249, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fabian Isensee, Jens Petersen, Andre Klein, David Zimmerer, Paul F. Jaeger, Simon Kohl, Jakob Wasserthal, Gregor Koehler, Tobias Norajitra, Sebastian Wirkert, and Klaus H. Maier-Hein. nnU-Net: Self-adapting Framework for U-Net-Based Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10486, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pengzhao Sun, Xiaoping Yang, and Yuhong Ban. Tongue segmentation algorithm for traditional Chinese medicine based on convolutional neural network. AOPC 2019: Optical Sensing and Imaging Technology. 11338: 113380Z, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Changen Zhou, Haoyi Fan, and Zuoyong Li. Tonguenet: Accurate Localization and Segmentation for Tongue Images Using Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Access, 7: 148779--148789, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Bingqian Lin, Junwei Xie, Cuihua Li, and Yanyun Qu. Deeptongue: Tongue Segmentation Via Resnet. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 1035--1039, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jianhang Zhou, Qi Zhang, Bob Zhang, and Xiaojiao Chen. TongueNet: A Precise and Fast Tongue Segmentation System Using U-Net with a Morphological Processing Layer. Applied Sciences, 9(15): 3128, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. TU-Net: A Precise Network for Tongue Segmentation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCPR '20: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition
      October 2020
      552 pages
      ISBN:9781450387835
      DOI:10.1145/3436369

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 January 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader