skip to main content
10.1145/3436829.3436863acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating the Interplay of User Experience Facets in the Context of Social Web Applications

Published:05 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

When the evaluation of social Web applications is tackled, significantly more attention is being paid to examination of various aspects of their acceptance as well as to measuring pragmatic aspects of usability rather than hedonic dimensions of user experience. With an aim to fill that void, this paper introduces a model composed solely of user experience facets. An interplay among attributes that constitute a model was assessed by means of the partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) technique. The study presented in the paper is the first one, to our knowledge, that examined the impact of uniqueness on both satisfaction and loyalty. Study findings revealed effect size and predictive validity of all exogenous latent variables in the model.

References

  1. Roto, V., Law, E.L-C. Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Hoonhout, J. 2011. User experience white paper - Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience, http://www.allaboutux.org/files/UX-WhitePaper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargas-Avila, J.A., Hornbæk, K. 2011. Old Wine in New Bottles or Novel Challenges? A Critical Analysis of Empirical Studies of User Experience. In 29th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2689--2698. ACM, Vancouver.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Orehovački, T., Bubaš, G., Kovačić, A. 2012. Taxonomy of Web 2.0 applications with educational potential. In Transformation in Teaching: Social Media Strategies in Higher Education, C. Cheal, J. Coughlin, S. Moore, Ed. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa, 43--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Huang, W.H.D., Hood, D.W., Yoo, SJ. 2013. Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 16, 57--65. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Orehovački, T., Babić, S. 2014. Predicting students' continuance intention related to the use of collaborative Web 2.0 applications. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems Development, pp. 112--122. Faculty of Organization and Informatics, Varaždin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Pang, M., Suh, W., Hong, J., Kim, J., Lee, H., 2010. A new web site quality assessment model for the Web 2.0 Era. In Handbook of Research on Web 2.0, 3.0, and X. 0: Technologies, Business, and Social Applications, S. Murugesan, Ed. IGI Global, Hershey, 387--410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Orehovački, T., Etinger, D., Babić, S. 2019. Modelling an interplay of adoption determinants with respect to social Web applications used in massive online open courses. Universal Access in the Information Society 18, 3, 469--487. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00673-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Orehovački, T., Babić, S. 2018. Identifying the relevance of quality dimensions contributing to universal access of social Web applications for collaborative writing on mobile devices: an empirical study. Universal Access in the Information Society 17, 3, 453--473. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0555-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Orehovački, T., Granić, A., Kermek, D. 2013. Evaluating the perceived and estimated quality in use of Web 2.0 applications. Journal of Systems and Software 86, 12 (December 2013), 3039--3059. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.071Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tractinsky, N., Hassenzahl, M. 2005. Arguing for Aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction. I-com 4, 3, 66--68. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1524/icom.2005.4.3.66Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Schenkman, B.N., Jönsson, F.U. 2000. Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour & Information Technology 19, 5, 367--377. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1080/014492900750000063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. De Wulf, K., Schillewaert, N., Muylle, S., Rangarajan, D. 2006. The role of pleasure in web site success. Information & Management 43, 4 (June 2006), 434--446. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.10.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Xu, L., Lin, J., Chan, H. C. 2012. The Moderating Effects of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Information Technology Continuance. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 2, Article No. 12 DOI=https://doi.org/10.1145/2240156.2240160Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lin, C.S., Wu, S., Tsai, R.J. 2005. Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Information & Management 42, 4 (February 2001), 683--693. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.04.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Liaw, S-S. 2008. Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education 51, 2 (September 2008), 864--873. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bhattacherjee, A. 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25, 3 (September 2001), 351--370. DOI=https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tzou, R-C., Lu, H-P. 2009. Exploring the emotional, aesthetic, and ergonomic facets of innovative product on fashion technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology 28, 4, 311--322. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290701763454Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ahn, T., Ryu, S., Han, I. 2007. The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information & Management 44, 3 (April 2007), 263--275. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.12.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sánchez-Franco, M.J. 2006. Exploring the influence of gender on the web usage via partial least squares. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 1, 19--36. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500124536Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Moon, J-W., Kim, Y-G. 2001. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management 38, 4 (February 2001), 217--230. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tian, K.T., Bearden, W.O., Hunter, G.L. 2001. Consumers' Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Consumer Research 28, 1 (June 2001), 50--66. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1086/321947Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19, 2, 139--151. DOI=https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Haenlein, M., Kaplan, A.M. 2004. A Beginner's Guide to Partial Least Squares Analysis. Understanding Statistics 3, 4, 283--297. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328031us0304_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M. 2015. SmartPLS 3, Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smart pls.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Orehovački, T. Methodology of Evaluating the Quality in Use of Web 2.0 Applications. PhD Thesis. Universtiy of Zagreb, Faculty of Organization and Informatics, VaraždinGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating the Interplay of User Experience Facets in the Context of Social Web Applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICSIE '20: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software and Information Engineering
      November 2020
      251 pages
      ISBN:9781450377218
      DOI:10.1145/3436829

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 January 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader