skip to main content
10.1145/3437959.3459250acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespadsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

COSIDIA: An Approach for Real-Time Parallel Discrete Event Simulations Tailored for Wireless Networks

Published:01 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hardware in the Loop (HIL) simulation is the de facto standard for system tests in the automotive industry. However, when it comes to Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) based applications, current simulators are not able to simulate sufficiently large test scenarios in real time. Thus, this paper introduces "Concurrent Simulation of Discrete Actions" (COSIDIA), a parallel simulation framework tailored for, but not limited to, wireless networks with many highly mobile nodes. COSIDIA is a Discrete Action Simulation (DAS) framework which extends the Discrete Event Simulation (DES) principle by assigning a duration to every event. This enables parallel execution of events by design, without the need for complex synchronisation algorithms. COSIDIA combines this concept with fibers, lightweight threads handled entirely in userspace. Preliminary results show that COSIDIA performs significantly better than a comparable singlecore DES simulation in terms of real-time execution.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

SIGSIM-PADS21-pads179s.mp4

mp4

42.6 MB

References

  1. D. S. Buse, M. Schettler, N. Kothe, P. Reinold, C. Sommer, and F. Dressler. 2018. Bridging worlds: Integrating hardware-in-the-loop testing with large-scale VANET simulation. In 2018 14th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS). 33--36. https://doi.org/10.23919/WONS.2018.8311659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). 2010. EN 302 665 Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Communications Architecture.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. H. K. Fathy, Z. S. Filipi, and J. L. Stein. 2006. Review of hardware-in-the-loop simulation and its prospects in the automotive area. Modeling and Simulation for Military Applications, Vol. 6228 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.667794Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. M. Fujimoto. 2000. Parallel and Distributed Simulation Systems. Wiley-Interscience. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Julius Higiro, Meseret Gebre, and Dhananjai M. Rao. 2017. Multi-Tier Priority Queues and 2-Tier Ladder Queue for Managing Pending Events in Sequential and Optimistic Parallel Simulations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation (SIGSIM-PADS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064911.3064921 event-place: Singapore, Republic of Singapore. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Georg Kunz, Mirko Stoffers, Olaf Landsiedel, Klaus Wehrle, and James Gross. 2016. Parallel Expanded Event Simulation of Tightly Coupled Systems. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul., Vol. 26, 2 (Jan. 2016), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2832909 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ioannis Mavromatis, Andrea Tassi, Robert J. Piechocki, and Andrew R. Nix. 2018. Poster: Parallel Implementation of the OMNeT+INET Framework for V2X Communications. In Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC). IEEE, 2 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mohammad Abu Obaida and Jason Liu. 2017. On Improving Parallel RealTime Network Simulation for Hybrid Experimentation of Software Defined Networks. In Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques (SIMUTOOLS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 63--71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173519.3173535 event-place: Hong Kong, China. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Obermaier, R. Riebl, and C. Facchi. 2018. Fully Reactive Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation for VANET Devices. In 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). 3755--3760. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569663Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Christina Obermaier, Raphael Riebl, Christian Facchi, Ali Al-Bayatti, and Sarmadullah Khan. 2019. Limitations of HIL Test Architectures for Car2X Communication Devices and Applications. In ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium (CSCS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359999.3360493 event-place: Kaiserslautern, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Shah, R. Valiente, N. Gupta, S. M. O. Gani, B. Toghi, Y. P. Fallah, and S. D. Gupta. 2019. Real-Time Hardware-In-the-Loop Emulation Framework for DSRC-Based Connected Vehicle Applications. In 2nd Connected and Automated Vehicles Symposium (CAVS). IEEE, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAVS.2019.8887797Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGSIM-PADS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation
    May 2021
    181 pages
    ISBN:9781450382960
    DOI:10.1145/3437959

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate398of779submissions,51%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader