ABSTRACT
Given the expansion of the Brazilian mobile development market and its dynamic context, it is essential to use interaction design and evaluation methods that suit the industry’s needs and allow companies to design high-quality applications while continuously evolving them. The present work reports our experience of developing the Mobili checklist and applying it within a software development project. Mobili offers guidance in conducting heuristic evaluations in mobile games and applications, and it was applied to assist in identifying priority corrections and evolutions for the software products developed in our project. Thus, this paper aims to share lessons that can be useful for teams in similar contexts.
- N Baber and C Stanton. 1996. Factors affecting the selection of methods and techniques prior to conducting a usability evaluation. Usability evaluation in industry(1996).Google Scholar
- Enrico Bertini, Tiziana Catarci, A Dix, Silvia Gabrielli, Stephen Kimani, and Giuseppe Santucci. 2009. Appropriating heuristic evaluation for mobile computing. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) 1, 1(2009), 20–41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nigel Bevan, Jim Carter, Jonathan Earthy, Thomas Geis, and Susan Harker. 2016. New ISO standards for usability, usability reports and usability measures. In International conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, 268–278.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruna CR Cunha, Kamila RH Rodrigues, and Maria da Graça C Pimentel. 2019. Synthesizing guidelines for facilitating elderly-smartphone interaction. In Proceedings of the 25th Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web. 37–44.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ruyther Parente Da Costa, Edna Dias Canedo, Rafael Timóteo De Sousa, Robson De Oliveira Albuquerque, and Luis Javier García Villalba. 2019. Set of usability heuristics for quality assessment of mobile applications on smartphones. IEEE Access 7(2019), 116145–116161.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ticianne Darin, Rossana Andrade, and Jaime Sánchez. 2018. CLUE: A Usability Evaluation Checklist for Multimodal Video Game Field Studies with Children Who Are Blind. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ticianne Darin, Nayana Carneiro, Rossana Andrade, Rute Castro, and Rodrigo Almeida. 2019. Integrating HCI Perspective into a Mobile Software Development Team: Strategies and lessons from the field. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- André de Lima Salgado and André Pimenta Freire. 2014. Heuristic evaluation of mobile usability: A mapping study. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 178–188.Google ScholarCross Ref
- André de Lima Salgado, Sandra S. Rodrigues, and Renata Pontin M Fortes. 2016. Evolving Heuristic Evaluation for multiple contexts and audiences: Perspectives from a mapping study. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication. 1–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giovanni Grano, Andrea Di Sorbo, Francesco Mercaldo, Corrado A Visaggio, Gerardo Canfora, and Sebastiano Panichella. 2017. Android apps and user feedback: a dataset for software evolution and quality improvement. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on App Market Analytics. 8–11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Setia Hermawati and Glyn Lawson. 2016. Establishing usability heuristics for heuristics evaluation in a specific domain: Is there a consensus?Applied ergonomics 56(2016), 34–51.Google Scholar
- Hartmut Hoehle, Ruba Aljafari, and Viswanath Venkatesh. 2016. Leveraging Microsoft’s mobile usability guidelines: Conceptualizing and developing scales for mobile application usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 89 (2016), 35–53.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ger Joyce, Mariana Lilley, Trevor Barker, and Amanda Jefferies. 2016. Mobile application usability: heuristic evaluation and evaluation of heuristics. In Advances in human factors, software, and systems engineering. Springer, 77–86.Google Scholar
- Ger Joyce, Mariana Lilley, Trevor Barker, and Amanda Jefferies. 2018. Heuristic evaluation for mobile applications: extending a map of the literature. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, 15–26.Google Scholar
- Aycan Kaya, Reha Ozturk, and Cigdem Altin Gumussoy. 2019. Usability measurement of mobile applications with system usability scale (SUS). In Industrial Engineering in the Big Data Era. Springer, 389–400.Google Scholar
- Ana Carolina Tomé Klock and Isabela Gasparini. 2015. A Usability Evaluation of Fitness-Tracking Apps for Initial Users. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 457–462.Google Scholar
- Hannu Korhonen. 2011. The explanatory power of playability heuristics. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. 1–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hannu Korhonen and Elina MI Koivisto. 2006. Playability heuristics for mobile games. In Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 9–16.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Caroline Krone. 2013. Validação de Heurísticas de Usabilidade para Celulares Touchscreen. Florianópolis (SC): Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Grupo de Qualidade de Software (2013).Google Scholar
- Mônica da Consolação Machado, Ronan Loschi Rodrigues Ferreira, and Lucila Ishitani. 2018. Heuristics and Recommendations for the Design of Mobile Serious Games for Older Adults. International Journal of Computer Games Technology 2018 (2018).Google Scholar
- Wes Martz. 2010. Validating an evaluation checklist using a mixed method design. Evaluation and program planning 33, 3 (2010), 215–222.Google Scholar
- Alice Mugisha, Victoria Nankabirwa, Thorkild Tylleskär, and Ankica Babic. 2019. A usability design checklist for Mobile electronic data capturing forms: the validation process. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 19, 1 (2019), 4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jakob Nielsen. 1995. 10 usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group 1, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
- Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich. 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 249–256.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mamta Pandey, Ratnesh Litoriya, and Prateek Pandey. 2019. Novel approach for mobile based app development incorporating MAAF. Wireless Personal Communications 107, 4 (2019), 1687–1708.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Freddy Paz, Daniela Villanueva, Cristian Rusu, Silvana Roncagliolo, and José Antonio Pow-Sang. 2013. Experimental evaluation of usability heuristics. In 2013 10th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations. IEEE, 119–126.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andraž Petrovčič, Sakari Taipale, Ajda Rogelj, and Vesna Dolničar. 2018. Design of mobile phones for older adults: An empirical analysis of design guidelines and checklists for feature phones and smartphones. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 34, 3(2018), 251–264.Google Scholar
- Deniese Pierotti. 1995. Heuristic evaluation-a system checklist. Xerox Corporation 12(1995).Google Scholar
- Luiz Henrique A Salazar, Thaísa Lacerda, Juliane Vargas Nunes, and Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim. 2013. A systematic literature review on usability heuristics for mobile phones. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) 5, 2(2013), 50–61.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luiz Henrique A Salazar, Thaísa Lacerda, Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim, and Rodrigo Araújo Barbalho. 2012. Customizando heurísticas de usabilidade para celulares. In Companion Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 37–38.Google ScholarDigital Library
- José Luis González Sánchez, Francisco Luis Gutiérrez Vela, Francisco Montero Simarro, and Natalia Padilla-Zea. 2012. Playability: analysing user experience in video games. Behaviour & Information Technology 31, 10 (2012), 1033–1054.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben Shneiderman. 1986. Eight golden rules of interface design. Disponible en (1986), 172.Google Scholar
- Doo Heon Song, Kwang Baek Kim, and Jong Hee Lee. 2019. Analysis and evaluation of mobile rhythm games: Game structure and playability. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9, 6(2019), 5263.Google Scholar
- Sarmad Soomro, Wan Fatimah Wan Ahmad, and Suziah Sulaiman. 2012. A preliminary study on heuristics for mobile games. In 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS), Vol. 2. IEEE, 1030–1035.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Penelope Sweetser, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Aiman Anwar, Yan Meng, and Anne Ozdowska. 2017. GameFlow in different game genres and platforms. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 15, 3 (2017), 1–24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kritpapon Thitichaimongkhol and Twittie Senivongse. 2016. Enhancing usability heuristics for android applications on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, Vol. 1. 19–21.Google Scholar
- Rosa Yáñez Gómez, Daniel Cascado Caballero, and José-Luis Sevillano. 2014. Heuristic evaluation on mobile interfaces: A new checklist. The Scientific World Journal 2014 (2014).Google Scholar
- Jisu Yi, Youseok Lee, and Sang-Hoon Kim. 2019. Determinants of growth and decline in mobile game diffusion. Journal of Business Research 99 (2019), 363–372.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Human-Centered Participatory Co-design of a Dosimetry-Quality Assurance Checklist in an Academic Cancer Center
Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Health, Operations Management, and DesignAbstractMost radiation oncology centers use in-house quality assurance (QA) checklists to ensure patient safety. Unfortunately, most of these QA checklists are often implemented in clinical settings without formal usability evaluation. We applied a human-...
Development of a Checklist for the Prevention of Intradialytic Hypotension in Hemodialysis Care: Design Considerations Based on Activity Theory
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHemodialysis is life-saving therapy for end-stage renal disease; yet, 20% of hemodialysis sessions are complicated by intradialytic hypotension ("IDH"). There is a need for approaches to preventing IDH that account for their implementation contexts. ...
Comments