skip to main content
10.1145/3441000.3441033acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lessons Learnt from Designing a Smart Clothing Telehealth System for Hospital Use

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe the design journey of a smart clothing system, SoPhy from the research laboratory to finally being evaluated in the hospital setting. SoPhy is a smart socks-based system, designed to make physiotherapy video consultations effective for assessing lower limb issues. SoPhy is the result of a 3-year journey of development, study and refinement of a research prototype done in collaboration with a physiotherapist. Drawing on this journey, we present seven lessons that emphasize on the importance of fostering strong collaborations with clinicians to move beyond laboratory studies and reach the target health setting. We provide contextual narratives on how we designed a comfortable smart clothing for patients; how we created an intuitive mapping of sensor data for clinicians; how we integrated hospital practice in the system design, and how we managed the ethics clearance for the field evaluation. We hope that these lessons are useful for HCI and health researchers who aim to innovate the field of health but feel restricted with the little knowledge of design and electronics.

References

  1. Deepti Aggarwal, Bernd Ploderer, Frank Vetere, Mark Bradford, and Thuong Hoang. 2016. Doctor, Can You See My Squats?: Understanding Bodily Communication in Video Consultations for Physiotherapy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, 1197-1208. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901871Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Deepti Aggarwal, Weiyi Zhang, Thuong Hoang, Bernd Ploderer, Frank Vetere, and Mark Bradford. 2017. SoPhy: A Wearable Technology for Lower Limb Assessment in Video Consultations of Physiotherapy. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17), 3916–3928. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025489Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Deepti Aggarwal, Bernd Ploderer, Thuong Hoang, Frank Vetere, and Mark Bradford. 2020. Physiotherapy Over a Distance: The Use of Wearable Technology for Video Consultations in Hospital Settings. ACM Trans. Comput. Healthcare 1, 4, Article 21 (September 2020), 29 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Maayan Agmon, Cynthia K. Perry, Elizabeth Phelan, George Demiris, and Huong Q. Nguyen. 2011. A pilot study of Wii Fit exergames to improve balance in older adults. Journal of geriatric physical therapy 34, 4: 161–167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Swamy Ananthanarayan, Miranda Sheh, Alice Chien, Halley Profita, and Katie Siek. 2013. Pt Viz: Towards a Wearable Device for Visualizing Knee Rehabilitation Exercises. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13), 1247–1250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mobolaji Ayoade and Lynne Baillie. 2014. A Novel Knee Rehabilitation System for the Home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14), 2521–2530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tony Attridge. 2008. Fitness Trainer Essentials: For the Personal Trainer. Pearson Education Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Australian Physiotherapy Association. 2014. Rural and Remote Australia. A survey report, APA, Melbourne. Retrieved from https://www.physiotherapy.asn.au/DocumentsFolder/APAWCM/Advocacy/2014%20Rural%20and%20Remote%20Australia.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ann Blandford. 2019. HCI for health and wellbeing: Challenges and opportunities. International journal of human-computer studies 131: 41–51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ann Blandford. 2018. Lessons from working with researchers and practitioners in healthcare. Interactions, 72-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3292023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ann Blandford, Erik Berndt, Ken Catchpole, Dominic Furniss, Astrid Mayer, Helena Mentis, Aisling Ann O'Kane, Tom Owen, Atish Rajkomar, and Rebecca Randell. 2015. Strategies for conducting situated studies of technology use in hospitals. Cognition, technology & work, 17, 4: 489–502.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. J. Bongers, Stuart Smith, Victor Donker, Michelle Pickrell, Rebecca Hall, and Stefan Lie. 2014. Interactive Infrastructures: Physical Rehabilitation Modules for Pervasive Healthcare Technology. In Pervasive Health. Springer, London, 229–254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilsoo Cho. 2009. Smart Clothing: Technology and Applications. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ella Dagan, Elena Márquez Segura, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Miguel Flores, Robb Mitchell, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Design Framework for Social Wearables. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’19), 1001–1015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Julie Doyle, Cathy Bailey, Ben Dromey, and Cliodhna Ni Scanaill. 2010. BASE - An interactive technology solution to deliver balance and strength exercises to older adults. In Proceedings of the 4th International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth2010.8881Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Anne G. Ekeland, Alison Bowes, and Signe Flottorp. 2010. Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. International Journal of medical informatics 2010, 79(11), 736–771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Gunnar Ellingsen. 2013. A review of 25 years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 22, 4-6, 6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dominic Furniss, Rebecca Randell, Aisling Ann O'Kane, Svetlena Taneva, Helena Mentis, and Ann Blandford. 2014. Fieldwork for Healthcare: Guidance for Investigating Human Factors in Computing Systems. Synthesis Lectures on Assistive, Rehabilitative, and Health-Preserving Technologies 2, 1: 1–146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. F. Gemperle, C. Kasabach, J. Stivoric, M. Bauer, and R. Martin. 1998. Design for wearability. In Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 116–122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Trisha Greenhalgh, Joe Wherton, Sara Shaw, and Clare Morrison. 2020. Video consultations for covid-19. BMJ 368: m998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Linsey Griffin, Crystal Compton, and Lucy E. Dunne. 2016. An analysis of the variability of anatomical body references within ready-to-wear garment sizes. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 84–91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2971763.2971800Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jun-Da Huang. 2011. Kinerehab: A Kinect-based System for Physical Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study for Young Adults with Motor Disabilities. In The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’11), 319–320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Agnes W. K. Lam, Danniel Varona-Marin, Yeti Li, Mitchell Fergenbaum, and Dana Kulić. 2016. Automated Rehabilitation System: Movement Measurement and Feedback for Patients and Physiotherapists in the Rehabilitation Clinic. Human–Computer Interaction 31, 3-4: 294–334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Deborah Lupton. 2020. Digital media and health. In The Sage International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society. SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Steve Mann. 1996. Smart Clothing: The Shift to Wearable Computing. In Communications of the ACM 39, 23–24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sarah Mennicken, Oliver Sack, and Martina Ziefle. 2011. People and a virtual doctor's visit: learning about multiple acceptance aspects of a telemedical scenario. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, PervasiveHealth, 2011, 577-584.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Helena M. Mentis, Ahmed Rahim, and Pierre Theodore. 2016. Crafting the Image in Surgical Telemedicine. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ’16), 744–755.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Helena M. Mentis, Rita Shewbridge, Sharon Powell, Melissa Armstrong, Paul Fishman, and Lisa Shulman. 2016. Co-Interpreting Movement With Sensors: Assessing Parkinson's Patients’ Deep Brain Stimulation Programming. Human–Computer Interaction 31, 3-4: 227–260.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kenton O'Hara, Cecily Morrison, Abigail Sellen, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Cathy Craig. 2016. Body tracking in healthcare. Synthesis Lectures on Assistive, Rehabilitative, and Health-Preserving 5, no. 1 (2016): 1- 151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Bernd Ploderer, Justin Fong, Anusha Withana, Marlena Klaic, Siddharth Nair, Vincent Crocher, Frank Vetere, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2016. ArmSleeve: A Patient Monitoring System to Support Occupational Therapists in Stroke Rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’16), 700–711.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Aneesha Singh, Stefano Piana, Davide Pollarolo, Gualtiero Volpe, Giovanna Varni, Ana Tajadura-Jiménez, Amanda Cdec Williams, Antonio Camurri, and Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2016. Go-with-the-Flow: Tracking, Analysis and Sonification of Movement and Breathing to Build Confidence in Activity Despite Chronic Pain. Human–Computer Interaction 31, 3-4: 335–383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Duncan Roderick Stevenson. 2011. Tertiary-Level Telehealth: A Media Space Application. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 20: 61-92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sheila Rosenberg, Emily Rosario, Julia Yeung, Davis Catolico, Russell Daniel, Ryan Lovell, Niko Fullmer, Elise Pearson, and Ruiqi Tang. 2016. Evaluation of a Wearable “Smart Socks” Gait Monitoring System for Improving Rehabilitation. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 97, 10: e77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Diane M. Strong, Olga Volkoff, Sharon A. Johnson, Lori R. Pelletier, Bengisu Tulu, Isa Bar-On, John Trudel, and Lawrence Garber. 2014. A Theory of Organization-EHR Affordance Actualization. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 15, 2: 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Richard Tang, Xing-Dong Yang, Scott Bateman, Joaquim Jorge, and Anthony Tang. 2015. Physio@Home: Exploring Visual Guidance and Feedback Techniques for Physiotherapy Exercises. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4123–4132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. G. Tao, P. S. Archambault, and M. F. Levin. 2013. Evaluation of Kinect skeletal tracking in a virtual reality rehabilitation system for upper limb hemiparesis. In 2013 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR), 164–165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Liezl van Dyk. 2014. A review of Telehealth Service Implementation Frameworks. International journal of environmental research and public health 11, no. 2 (2014): 1279-1298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Clint Zeagler. 2017. Where to wear it: functional, technical, and social considerations in on-body location for wearable technology 20 years of designing for wearability. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC ’17), 150–157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '20: Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    December 2020
    764 pages

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 February 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format