skip to main content
10.1145/3441417.3441425acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicaaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Comparative Study of Parkinson Disease Diagnosis in Machine Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a cumulative disorder in the nervous system. PD patients may experience difficulty in movement and speaking due to damages in certain parts in the brain. In this study, we propose using two types of Ensemble learning methods Stacking Classifier and voting classifier, which are potential methods of PD detection using machine learning. Then, we compared between the results of both of them. Stacking Classifier method outperformed voting classifier and the obtained accuracy was 92.2% and 83.57%, respectively. This comparative study would help come out with higher detection accuracy for medical applications such as this chronic disease.

References

  1. Pillon, B., Dubois, B., Cusimano, G., Bonnet, A.-M., Lhermitte, F., & Agid, Y. (1989). Does cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease result from non-dopaminergic lesions? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 52(2), 201-206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloem, B.R. and M. Munneke, Revolutionising management of chronic disease: The ParkinsonNet approach. Bmj, 2014. 348: p. g1838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. H.-L. Chen, G. Wang, C. Ma, Z.-N. Cai, W.-B. Liu, and S.-J. Wang, "An efficient hybrid kernel extreme learning machine approach for early diagnosis of Parkinson׳ s disease," Neurocomputing, vol. 184, pp. 131-144, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Calne, B. Snow, and C. Lee, "Criteria for diagnosing Parkinson's disease," Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society, vol. 32, no. S1, pp. S125-S127, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H.-L. Chen , "An efficient diagnosis system for detection of Parkinson's disease using fuzzy k-nearest neighbor approach," Expert systems with applications, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 263-271, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Sommer and D. W. Gerlich, "Machine learning in cell biology–teaching computers to recognize phenotypes," J Cell Sci, vol. 126, no. 24, pp. 5529-5539, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Nilashi, O. Bin Ibrahim, A. Mardani, A. Ahani, and A. Jusoh, "A soft computing approach for diabetes disease classification," Health Informatics Journal, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 379-393, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. Ozer , "Supervised and unsupervised methods for prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI," Medical physics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1873-1883, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nilashi, M., , A soft computing approach for diabetes disease classification. Health Informatics Journal, 2018. 24(4): p. 379-393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Polikar, R. (2006). Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and systems magazine, 6(3), 21-45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ö. Eskidere, F. Ertaş, and C. Hanilçi, "A comparison of regression methods for remote tracking of Parkinson's disease progression," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 5523-5528, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Hariharan, K. Polat, and R. Sindhu, "A new hybrid intelligent system for accurate detection of Parkinson's disease," Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 904-913, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. Peterek, P. Dohnálek, P. Gajdoš, and M. Šmondrk, "Performance evaluation of Random Forest regression model in tracking Parkinson's disease progress," in 13th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2013), 2013: IEEE, pp. 83-87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W.-L. Zuo, Z.-Y. Wang, T. Liu, and H.-L. Chen, "Effective detection of Parkinson's disease using an adaptive fuzzy k-nearest neighbor approach," Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 364-373, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. S. Islam, I. Parvez, H. Deng, and P. Goswami, "Performance comparison of heterogeneous classifiers for detection of Parkinson's disease using voice disorder (dysphonia)," in 2014 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV), 2014: IEEE, pp. 1-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. V. Despotovic, T. Skovranek, and C. Schommer, "Speech Based Estimation of Parkinson's Disease Using Gaussian Processes and Automatic Relevance Determination," Neurocomputing, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. Polat, "A Hybrid Approach to Parkinson Disease Classification Using Speech Signal: The Combination of SMOTE and Random Forests," in 2019 Scientific Meeting on Electrical-Electronics & Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science (EBBT), 2019: IEEE, pp. 1-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sakar, C. O., Serbes, G., Gunduz, A., Tunc, H. C., Nizam, H., Sakar, B. E., Apaydin, H. (2019). A comparative analysis of speech signal processing algorithms for Parkinson's disease classification and the use of the tunable Q-factor wavelet transform. Applied Soft Computing, 74, 255-263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Froelich, W., K. Wrobel, and P. Porwik, Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease using speech samples and threshold-based classification. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 2015. 5(6): p. 1358-1363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Logemann, J.A., , Frequency and cooccurrence of vocal tract dysfunctions in the speech of a large sample of Parkinson patients. Journal of Speech and hearing Disorders, 1978. 43(1): p. 47-57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Parisi, L., N. RaviChandran, and M.L. Manaog, Feature-driven machine learning to improve early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Expert Systems with Applications, 2018. 110: p. 182-190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Xie, Y., Y. Liu, and Q. Fu, Imbalanced data sets classification based on SVM for sand-dust storm warning. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2015. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research, 16, 321-357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsoumakas, G., Katakis, I., & Vlahavas, I. (2004). Effective voting of heterogeneous classifiers. Paper presented at the European Conference on Machine Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sikora, R. (2015). A modified stacking ensemble machine learning algorithm using genetic algorithms Handbook of Research on Organizational Transformations through Big Data Analytics (pp. 43-53): IGi Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. A. Tsanas, M. A. Little, P. E. McSharry, J. Spielman and L. O. Ramig, "Novel Speech Signal Processing Algorithms for High-Accuracy Classification of Parkinson's Disease," in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1264-1271, May 2012, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2183367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. B. Pittman, R. H. Ghomi and D. Si, "Parkinson's Disease Classification of mPower Walking Activity Participants," 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Honolulu, HI, 2018, pp. 4253-4256, doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. Magotra and K. Kumar, “Detection of HELLO flood attack on LEACH protocol,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC '14), pp. 193–198, Gurgaon, India, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. M.A. Little, P.E. McSharry, E.J. Hunter, J. Spielman, L.O. Ramig. Suitability of dysphonia measurements for telemonitoring of Parkinson‟s disease, IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering 56(4), 1015-1022, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. S. Sapir, L. Ramig, J. Spielman, C. Fox, Formant Centralization Ratio (FCR): A proposal for a new acoustic measure of dysarthric speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 53, 114-25, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. A. Tsanas, M.A. Little, P.E. McSharry, L.O. Ramig, Nonlinear speech analysis algorithms mapped to a standard metric achieve clinically useful quantification of average Parkinson‟s disease symptom severity, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Vol. 8, 842-855, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. I.R. Titze. Principles of Voice Production. National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa City, US, 2nd ed., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Aida-zade K, Xocayev A,Rustamov S. Speech recognition usingsupport vector machines. In: AICT’16.10th IEEE International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies; 2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Tirumala SS, Shahamiri SR,Garhwal AS, Wang R. Speaker identification features extraction methods: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications. 2017; 90:250-271Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. V. Nigam, S. Jain, and K. Burse, “Profile based scheme against DDoS attack in WSN,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT '14), pp. 112–116, Bhopal, India, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Krassovitskiy A, Mussabayev R. Energy-based centroid identification and cluster propagation with noise detection. In: Nguyen N, Pimenidis E, Khan Z, Trawiński B, editors. Computational Collective Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 11055. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 523-533. DOI: 10.1007/978-3- 319-98443-8_48. ICCCI 2018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. P. Yi, T. Zhu, Q. Zhang, Y. Wu, and J. H. Li, “A denial of service attack in advanced metering infrastructure network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '14), Sydney, Australia, June 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICAAI '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
    October 2020
    102 pages
    ISBN:9781450387842
    DOI:10.1145/3441417

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 February 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format