skip to main content
10.1145/3441417.3441429acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicaaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Transitioning from Traditional Learning to Blended Learning at Some Public Universities in Vietnam after the Covid-19 Pandemic

Published:04 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Covid-19 pandemic has addressed critical impacts leading to the nationwide social distancing measures in Vietnam. School closures were mandated by the Government in an attempt to control the transmission of the virus. Online teaching and learning was then temporarily adopted to ensure students’ continuous learning. However, the effectiveness of this method was far from expectation. Students showed their reluctance to engage in the virtual learning environment. In the meantime, they shared their negative feedback on the traditional teaching and learning method. As a result, lecturers desired to have a more effective approach conducted after the pandemic. Therefore, this study was carried out to investigate the feasibility of blended learning implementation at some public universities in Vietnam. The results revealed positive feedback from both students and teachers.

References

  1. Bonk, C. J. (2009). The world is open: How web technology is revolutionizing education (pp. 3371-3380). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. McGredie, J. (2003). Does IT matter to higher education?. Educause review, 38, 14-23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M. E., Nölting, K., Röser, M., & Voigt, D. (2004). Is e-Learning the Solution for Individual Learning?. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 2(2), 273-280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Souder, W. E. (1993). The effectiveness of traditional vs. satellite delivery in three management of technology master's degree programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 37-53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Beare, P. L. (1989). Media: The comparative effectiveness of videotape, audiotape, and telelecture in delivering continuing teacher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 57-66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning?. TechTrends, 63(5), 564-569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Oh, E., & Park, S. (2009). How are universities involved in blended instruction?. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 327-342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, H. C., & Fill, K. (2007). Embedding blended learning in a university's teaching culture: Experiences and reflections. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 817-828.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Azizan, F. Z. (2010). Blended learning in higher education institution in Malaysia. In Proceedings of regional conference on knowledge integration in ICT (Vol. 10, pp. 454-466).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. Journal of educators online, 4(1), n1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yuen, A. H. K. (2010). Blended learning in higher education: An exploration of teaching approaches. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education: Enhancing and Sustaining New Knowledge Through the Use of Digital Technology in Education, ICCE 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoang, N. T. (2015. EFL teachers’ perceptions and experiences of BL in a Vietnamese university. Office of Education Research; Faculty of Education. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/83945/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Joosten, T. M., Barth, D., Harness, L., & Weber, N. L. (2014). The impact of instructional development and training for blended teaching on course effectiveness. Blended learning: Research perspectives, 2, 173-189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Alebaikan, R., & Troudi, S. (2010). Blended learning in Saudi universities: challenges and perspectives. ALT-J, 18(1), 49-59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea?. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15-23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57-78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Betts, K. (2014). Factors influencing faculty participation & retention in online & blended education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(1), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Information and communication technology in teacher education in Vietnam: from policy to practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11(2), 89-103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICAAI '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
    October 2020
    102 pages
    ISBN:9781450387842
    DOI:10.1145/3441417

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 February 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format