ABSTRACT
This research aims to explore how tangible technology created through co-design can be designed in a way that invites social interaction for people with intellectual disability. We conducted co-design sessions with one participant to create a sensory musical blanket. As the trials were run in a collective environment, their peers were drawn to the developing design. The design method and unique interactions are key contributions of this research.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- Meryl Alper. 2021. Critical Media Access Studies: Deconstructing Power, Visibility, and Marginality in Mediated Space. International Journal of Communication 15, 0 (Jan. 2021), 22. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15274 Number: 0.Google Scholar
- Helen E. Andreae, Peter M. Andreae, Jason Low, and Deidre Brown. 2014. A study of auti: a socially assistive robotic toy. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children - IDC ’14. ACM Press, Aarhus, Denmark, 245–248. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610463Google ScholarDigital Library
- Filip Bircanin, Laurianne Sitbon, Benoit Favre, and Margot Brereton. 2020. Designing an IIR Research Apparatus with Users with Severe Intellectual Disability. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3378008Google ScholarDigital Library
- Filip Bircanin, Laurianne Sitbon, Bernd Ploderer, Andrew Azaabanye Bayor, Michael Esteban, Stewart Koplick, and Margot Brereton. 2020. The TalkingBox.: Revealing Strengths of Adults with Severe Cognitive Disabilities. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Virtual Event Greece, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3417025Google ScholarDigital Library
- Margot Brereton, Laurianne Sitbon, Muhammad Haziq Lim Abdullah, Mark Vanderberg, and Stewart Koplick. 2015. Design after design to bridge between people living with cognitive or sensory impairments, their friends and proxies. CoDesign 11, 1 (Jan. 2015), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1009471 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1009471.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julie Causton-Theoharis, Christine Ashby, and Meghan Cosier. 2009. Islands of Loneliness: Exploring Social Interaction Through the Autobiographies of Individuals With Autism. Intellectual and developmental disabilities 47 (May 2009), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.2.84Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pete Denman, Lama Nachman, and Sai Prasad. 2016. Designing for ”a” user: Stephen Hawking’s UI. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2(PDC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 94–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948076.2948112Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur. 2006. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124838Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony Hornof, Haley Whitman, Marah Sutherland, Samuel Gerendasy, and Joanna McGrenere. 2017. Designing for the ”Universe of One”: Personalized Interactive Media Systems for People with the Severe Cognitive Impairment Associated with Rett Syndrome. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17. ACM Press, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2137–2148. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025904Google ScholarDigital Library
- Micah O Mazurek. 2014. Loneliness, friendship, and well-being in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism 18, 3 (April 2014), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361312474121 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yvonne Rafferty and Kenneth W. Griffin. 2005. Benefits and Risks of Reverse Inclusion for Preschoolers with and without Disabilities: Perspectives of Parents and Providers. Journal of Early Intervention 27, 3 (April 2005), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510502700305 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karanya Sitdhisanguan, Nopporn Chotikakamthorn, Ajchara Dechaboon, and Patcharaporn Out. 2012. Using tangible user interfaces in computer-based training systems for low-functioning autistic children. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 2 (Feb. 2012), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0382-4Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gail Teachman, Peggy McDonough, Colin Macarthur, and Barbara E. Gibson. 2020. Interrogating inclusion with youths who use augmentative and alternative communication. Sociology of Health & Illness 42, 5 (2020), 1108–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13087 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9566.13087.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ilan Wiesel and Christine Bigby. 2014. Being Recognised and Becoming Known: Encounters between People with and without Intellectual Disability in the Public Realm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46, 7 (July 2014), 1754–1769. https://doi.org/10.1068/a46251 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cara Wilson, Margot Brereton, Bernd Ploderer, and Laurianne Sitbon. 2019. Co-Design Beyond Words: ’Moments of Interaction’ with Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300251Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cara Wilson, Laurianne Sitbon, Bernd Ploderer, Jeremy Opie, and Margot Brereton. 2020. Self-Expression by Design: Co-Designing the ExpressiBall with Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376171Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Expanding Designing for One to Invite Others Through Reverse Inclusion
Recommendations
Socially Connecting Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Through Inclusive Co-Design of Tangible and Visual Technology
ASSETS '22: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and AccessibilityPeople with intellectual disabilities experience difficulties developing social connections with others as it heavily relies on verbal and written communication. Co-designing tangible and visual technology with people with intellectual disabilities can ...
Co-designing with young adults with intellectual disability to develop social life skills
AfriCHI '18: Proceedings of the Second African Conference for Human Computer Interaction: Thriving CommunitiesParticipation in social media has become mainstream and accessible, especially among young people. Social media offer opportunities for social connectedness as well as content sharing and skills development. Developing social skills is an essential goal ...
Co-designing interactive applications with adults with intellectual disability: a case study
OzCHI '17: Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human InteractionCurrent and emerging participatory design practices are providing opportunities for people with intellectual disability to have a say in how technology can best support them and their individual needs. In this paper, we present lessons learnt from a co-...
Comments