skip to main content
10.1145/3442381.3450041acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fair Partitioning of Public Resources: Redrawing District Boundary to Minimize Spatial Inequality in School Funding

Published: 03 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Public schools in the United States offer tuition-free primary and secondary education to their students, and are divided into school districts funded by the local and state governments. Although the primary source of school district revenue is public money, several studies have pointed to the inequality in funding across different school districts. In this paper, we focus on the spatial geometry/distribution of such inequality, i.e., how the highly funded and lesser funded school districts are located relative to each other. Due to the major reliance on local property taxes for school funding, we find existing school district boundaries promoting financial segregation, with highly-funded school districts surrounded by lesser-funded districts and vice-versa.
To counter such issues, we formally propose the Fair Partitioning  problem to divide a given set of schools into k districts such that the spatial inequality in the district-level funding is minimized. However, the Fair Partitioning  problem turns out to be computationally challenging, and we formally show that it is strongly -complete. We further provide a greedy algorithm to offer practical solution to Fair Partitioning, and show its effectiveness in lowering spatial inequality in school district funding across different states in the United States.

References

[1]
Rediet Abebe, Jon Kleinberg, and David C Parkes. 2017. Fair Division via Social Comparison. In AAMAS. 281–289.
[2]
Konstantin Andreev and Harald Racke. 2006. Balanced graph partitioning. Theory of Computing Systems 39, 6 (2006), 929–939.
[3]
Anthony B Atkinson 1970. On the measurement of inequality. Journal of economic theory 2, 3 (1970).
[4]
Robert Bredereck, Andrzej Kaczmarczyk, and Rolf Niedermeier. 2018. Envy-free allocations respecting social networks. In AAMAS. 283–291.
[5]
Lauren Camera. 2019. White Students Get More K-12 Funding Than Students of Color: Report. https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2019-02-26/white-students-get-more-k-12-funding-than-students-of-color-report
[6]
Abhijnan Chakraborty, Nuno Mota, Asia J Biega, Krishna P Gummadi, and Hoda Heidari. 2019. On the Impact of Choice Architectures on Inequality in Online Donation Platforms. In WWW. 2623–2629.
[7]
Jiasi Chen, Mung Chiang, Jeffrey Erman, Guangzhi Li, KK Ramakrishnan, and Rakesh K Sinha. 2015. Fair and optimal resource allocation for LTE multicast (eMBMS): Group partitioning and dynamics. In IEEE INFOCOM.
[8]
Yiling Chen and Nisarg Shah. 2017. Ignorance is often bliss: Envy with incomplete information. Technical Report.
[9]
Yochi Cohen-Charash and Jennifer S Mueller. 2007. Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy?Journal of applied psychology 92, 3 (2007), 666.
[10]
Stephen Q. Cornman, Laura C. Nixon, Matthew J. Spence, Taylor Lori L., and Douglas E. Geverdt. 2019. American Community Survey Comparable Wage Index for Teachers (ACS-CWIFT). Technical Report.
[11]
Antonella Corsi-Bunker. 2015. Guide to the education system in the United States. University of Minnesota 23 (2015).
[12]
Frank Cowell and Udo Ebert. 2008. Inequality and envy. In Inequality and Opportunity: Papers From the Second Ecineq Society Meeting. Research on Economic Inequality, Vol. 16. 37–47.
[13]
Raghuveer Devulapalli. 2014. Geometric partitioning algorithms for fair division of geographic resources. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota.
[14]
Inderjit S Dhillon. 2001. Co-clustering documents and words using bipartite spectral graph partitioning. In ACM KDD. 269–274.
[15]
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012. Fairness through awareness. In ITCS. 214–226.
[16]
EdBuild. 2019. Non-white school districts get $23 Billion less than white districts, despite serving the same number of students. edbuild.org/content/23-billion
[17]
Sommer E Gentry, Allan B Massie, Sidney W Cheek, Krista L Lentine, EH Chow, Corey E Wickliffe, Nino Dzebashvili, Paolo R Salvalaggio, Mark A Schnitzler, David A Axelrod, 2013. Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting. American Journal of Transplantation 13, 8 (2013).
[18]
Vladimir Gimpelson and Daniel Treisman. 2018. Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics 30, 1 (2018), 27–54.
[19]
Corrado Gini. 1912. Variabilità e mutabilità. Reprinted in Memorie di metodologica statistica (Ed. Pizetti E, Salvemini, T). Rome: Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi (1912).
[20]
Chris Gray, Frank Kammer, Maarten Löffler, and Rodrigo I Silveira. 2012. Removing local extrema from imprecise terrains. Comp. Geometry 45, 7 (2012).
[21]
Adam Harris. 2019. The Whiter, Richer School District Right Next Door. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2019/08/segregated-school-districts-trapped-their-borders/595318/
[22]
Oliver P Hauser and Michael I Norton. 2017. (Mis) perceptions of inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology 18 (2017), 21–25.
[23]
C Kirabo Jackson, Rucker C Johnson, and Claudia Persico. 2015. The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131, 1 (2015).
[24]
David S Johnson and Michael R Garey. 1979. Computers and intractability: A guide to the theory of NP-completeness. WH Freeman.
[25]
George Karypis, Rajat Aggarwal, Vipin Kumar, and Shashi Shekhar. 1999. Multilevel hypergraph partitioning: applications in VLSI domain. IEEE Trans. on Very Large Scale Integration Systems 7, 1 (1999), 69–79.
[26]
Markus Knell and Helmut Stix. 2020. Perceptions of inequality. European Journal of Political Economy 65 (2020), 101927.
[27]
Julien Lafortune, Jesse Rothstein, and Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach. 2018. School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10, 2 (2018), 1–26.
[28]
Joel McFarland, Bill Hussar, Xiaolei Wang, Jijun Zhang, Ke Wang, Amy Rathbun, Amy Barmer, Emily Forrest Cataldi, and Farrah Bullock Mann. 2018. The Condition of Education 2018.National Center for Education Statistics(2018).
[29]
NCES. 2019. Comparable Wage Index for Teachers (CWIFT). https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Economic/TeacherWage
[30]
NCES. 2019. NCES Common Core of Data. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd
[31]
NCES. 2019. The School Attendance Boundary Survey (SABS). https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/SABS
[32]
Gourab K Patro, Arpita Biswas, Niloy Ganguly, Krishna P Gummadi, and Abhijnan Chakraborty. 2020. Fairrec: Two-sided fairness for personalized recommendations in two-sided platforms. In WWW. 1194–1204.
[33]
Maria Predari and Aurélien Esnard. 2016. A k-way greedy graph partitioning with initial fixed vertices for parallel applications. In IEEE PDP.
[34]
Tieyun Qian, Yang Yang, and Shuo Wang. 2010. Refining graph partitioning for social network clustering. In WISE. 77–90.
[35]
Chiara Assunta Ricci. 2016. Perceived Social Position and Objective Inequality: Do They Move Together? Evidence from Europe and the United States. Italian Economic Journal 2, 3 (2016), 281–303.
[36]
Meredith P Richards. 2014. The gerrymandering of school attendance zones and the segregation of public schools: A geospatial analysis. American Educational Research Journal 51, 6 (2014).
[37]
Debra Satz. 2007. Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics 117, 4 (2007), 623–648.
[38]
Genevieve Siegel-Hawley. 2013. Educational gerrymandering? Race and attendance boundaries in a demographically changing suburb. Harvard Educational Review 83, 4 (2013).
[39]
Till Speicher, Hoda Heidari, Nina Grgic-Hlaca, Krishna P. Gummadi, Adish Singla, Adrian Weller, and Muhammad Bilal Zafar. 2018. A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual and Group Unfairness via Inequality Indices. In ACM KDD. 2239–2248.
[40]
Ana-Andreea Stoica, Abhijnan Chakraborty, Palash Dey, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2020. Minimizing Margin of Victory for Fair Political and Educational Districting. In AAMAS. 1305–1313.
[41]
Adam Swift. 2003. How not to be a hypocrite: School choice for the morally perplexed parent. Routledge.
[42]
Henri Theil. 1967. Economics and information theory. Technical Report.
[43]
Pim van ’t Hof, Daniël Paulusma, and Gerhard J. Woeginger. 2009. Partitioning graphs into connected parts. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410, 47-49 (2009).
[44]
William Vickrey. 1961. On the prevention of gerrymandering. Political Science Quarterly 76, 1 (1961), 105–110.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Redrawing Attendance Boundaries to Promote Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Elementary SchoolsEducational Researcher10.3102/0013189X23117085852:6(348-364)Online publication date: 15-May-2023
  • (2023)FairAssign: Stochastically Fair Driver Assignment in Gig Delivery PlatformsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3593013.3594040(753-763)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WWW '21: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021
April 2021
4054 pages
ISBN:9781450383127
DOI:10.1145/3442381
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WWW '21
Sponsor:
WWW '21: The Web Conference 2021
April 19 - 23, 2021
Ljubljana, Slovenia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Redrawing Attendance Boundaries to Promote Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Elementary SchoolsEducational Researcher10.3102/0013189X23117085852:6(348-364)Online publication date: 15-May-2023
  • (2023)FairAssign: Stochastically Fair Driver Assignment in Gig Delivery PlatformsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3593013.3594040(753-763)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media