skip to main content
10.1145/3442442.3453457acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Proposing a Broader Scope of Predictive Features for Modeling Refugee Counts

Published:03 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The world-wide refugee problem has a long history, but continues to this day, and will unfortunately continue into the foreseeable future. Efforts to anticipate, mitigate and prepare for refugee counts, however, are still lacking. There are many potential causes, but the published research has primarily focused on identifying ways to integrate already existing refugees into the various communities wherein they ultimately reside, rather than on preventive measures. The work proposed herein uses a set of features that can be divided into three basic categories: 1) sociocultural, 2) socioeconomic, and 3) economic, which refer to the nature of each proposed predictive feature. For example, corruption perception is a sociocultural feature, access to healthcare is a socioeconomic feature, and inflation is an economic feature. Forty-five predictive features were collected for various years and countries of interest. As may seem intuitive, the features that fell under the category of "economic" produced the highest predictive value from the regression technique employed. However, additional potential predictive features that have not been previously addressed stood out in our experiments. These include: the global peace index (gpi), freedom of expression (fe), internet users (iu), access to healthcare (hc), cost of living index (coli), local purchasing power index (lppi), homicide rate (hr), access to justice (aj), and women's property rights (wpr). Many of these features are nascent in terms of both their development and collection, as well as the fact that some of these features are not yet collected at a universal level, meaning that the data is missing for some countries and years. Ongoing work regarding these datasets for predicting refugee counts is also discussed in this work.

References

  1. UNHCR, 2019, “Global Trends: Forced displacement in 2019”. Accessed: January 27, 2021. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/5ee200e37.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang, Y., & Ling, C. (2018). A strategy to apply machine learning to small datasets in materials science. Npj Computational Materials, 4(1), 1-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Feng, S., Zhou, H., & Dong, H. (2019). Using deep neural network with small dataset to predict material defects. Materials & Design, 162, 300-310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jiang, J., Wang, R., Wang, M., Gao, K., Nguyen, D. D., & Wei, G. W. (2020). Boosting tree-assisted multitask deep learning for small scientific datasets. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 60(3), 1235-1244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Richmond, A. H. (1993). Reactive migration: Sociological perspectives on refugee movements. Journal of refugee Studies, 6(1), 7-24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Schmeidl, S., & Jenkins, J. C. (1996). Issues in quantitative modelling in the early warning of refugee migration. Refuge: Canada's Journal on Refugees, 4-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Schmeidl, S. (1997). Exploring the causes of forced migration: A pooled time-series analysis, 1971-1990. Social Science Quarterly, 284-308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Apodaca, C. (1998). Human rights abuses: precursor to refugee flight? J. Refugee Stud., 11, 80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Arango, J. (2000). Explaining migration: a critical view. International social science journal, 52(165), 283-296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Davenport, C., Moore, W., & Poe, S. (2003). Sometimes you just have to leave: Domestic threats and forced migration, 1964-1989. International Interactions, 29(1), 27-55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Larkin, J. (2003). Why refugees flee. Far Eastern Economic Review, 166(9), 14-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bijak, J. (2005). Bayesian methods in international migration forecasting. Central European Forum for Migration Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shellman, S. M., & Stewart, B. M. (2007). Predicting risk factors associated with forced migration: An early warning model of Haitian flight. Civil Wars, 9(2), 174-199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Martineau, J. S. (2010). Red flags: A model for the early warning of refugee outflows. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 8(2), 135-157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Black, R., Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., Dercon, S., Geddes, A., & Thomas, D. (2011). The effect of environmental change on human migration. Global environmental change, 21, S3-S11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mead, E. L., Hussain, M. N., Nooman, M., Al-khateeb, S., & Agarwal, N. (2017). Assessing situation awareness through blogosphere: a case study on Venezuelan socio-political crisis and the migrant influx. In The Seventh International Conference on Social Media Technologies, Communication, and Informatics (SOTICS 2017) (pp. 22-29).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mead, E. L., Hussain, M. N., Nooman, M., Al-khateeb, S., & Agarwal, N. Voices from Venezuela: Examining Blogs to Study the Socio-Politico-Economic Crisis and Consequent Emigration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ninković, V., & Keković, Z. (2017). DYNAMIC MIGRATION FLOW MODELLING. Security Dialogues, 8(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Abrishamkar, S., Khonsari, F., An, A., Huang, J. X., & McGrath, S. (2018). Mining Large-scale News Articles For Predicting Forced Migration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Carammia, M., & Dumont, J. C. (2018). Can we anticipate future migration flows. Migration Policy Debates, OECD/EASO, (16).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nair, R., Madsen, B. S., Lassen, H., Baduk, S., Nagarajan, S., Mogensen, L. H., ... & Urbak, S. (2019). A machine learning approach to scenario analysis and forecasting of mixed migration. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 64(1/2), 7-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hébert, G. A., Perez, L., & Harati, S. (2018). An agent-based model to identify migration pathways of refugees: the case of Syria. In Agent-Based Models and Complexity Science in the Age of Geospatial Big Data (pp. 45-58). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Campos, C. V., Suleimenova, D., & Groen, D. (2019, June). A Coupled Food Security and Refugee Movement Model for the South Sudan Conflict. In International Conference on Computational Science (pp. 725-732). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Andrews, D. F. (1974). A robust method for multiple linear regression. Technometrics, 16(4), 523-531.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WWW '21: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021
    April 2021
    726 pages
    ISBN:9781450383134
    DOI:10.1145/3442442

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 3 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    Upcoming Conference

    WWW '24
    The ACM Web Conference 2024
    May 13 - 17, 2024
    Singapore , Singapore
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format