Teodora Petkova
ABSTRACT
This research explores the content of marketing communications on the Web in their dialogic and data aspects. Bringing together theories from the fields of digital marketing communications and the Semantic Web, the work investigates how web marketing content is used for building semantic relationships between data nodes (by using schema.org) and across semiotic interpretative routes (by adhering to dialogic principles for communication).
- Elisabetta Adami. 2015. What’s in a click? A social semiotic framework for the multimodal analysis of website interactivity. Visual Communication 14, 2 (2015), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357214565583 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357214565583Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Dieter Fensel, Wolfgang Wahlster, and Henry Lieberman. 2002. Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
- Dieter Fensel, Umutcan Şimşek, Kevin Angele, Elwin Huaman, Elias Kärle, Oleksandra Panasiuk, Ioan Toma, Jürgen Umbrich, and Alexander Wahler. 2020. Knowledge Graphs: Methodology, Tools and Selected Use Cases. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6 OCLC: 1140153769.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fabien Gandon. 2002. Distributed Artificial Intelligence And Knowledge Management: Ontologies And Multi-Agent Systems For A Corporate Semantic Web. Ph.D. Dissertation. Doctoral School of Sciences and Technologies of Information and Communication (S.T.I.C.).Google Scholar
- Jose Manuel Gomez-Perez and Honghan Wu. 2016. Exploiting linked data and knowledge graphs in large organisations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Christian Grönroos. 2004. The relationship marketing process: communication, interaction, dialogue, value. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 19, 2 (March 2004), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620410523981Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thorsten Hennig-Thurau and Ursula Hansen. 2000. Relationship marketing: gaining competitive advantage through customer satisfaction and customer retention. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, United Kingdom. http://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3100721 OCLC: 861706291.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donna L. Hoffman and Thomas P. Novak. 1996. Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing 60, 3 (July 1996), 50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251841Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael L Kent and Maureen Taylor. 1998. Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review 24, 3 (Sept. 1998), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-XGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Atanas Kiryakov, Borislav Popov, Ivan Terziev, Dimitar Manov, and Damyan Ognyanoff. 2004. Semantic annotation, indexing, and retrieval. Journal of Web Semantics 2, 1 (2004), 49–79.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew Miller, Jeff Walloch, and M. Pattuelli. 2012. Visualizing Linked Jazz: A web-based tool for social network analysis and exploration. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49 (01 2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901295Google Scholar
- A. Sheth, C. Bertram, D. Avant, B. Hammond, K. Kochut, and Y. Warke. 2002. Managing semantic content for the Web. IEEE Internet Computing 6, 4 (July 2002), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2002.1020330Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amit Sheth, Swati Padhee, Amelie Gyrard, and Amit Sheth. 2019. Knowledge Graphs and Knowledge Networks: The Story in Brief. IEEE Internet Computing 23, 4 (July 2019), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2019.2928449Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tabea Tietz, Joscha Jäger, Jörg Waitelonis, and Harald Sack. 2016. Semantic Annotation and Information Visualization for Blogposts with refer. In Proc. of 2nd. Int. Workshop on Visualization and Interaction for Ontologies and Linked Data 2016, co-located with ISWC 2016. CEUR-WS, Aachen, Germany.Google Scholar
- Richard J. Varey. 2002. Relationship marketing: dialogue and networks in the e-commerce era. Wiley, Chichester. OCLC: ocm50055771.Google Scholar
- Alladi Venkatesh. 1998. Cybermarketscapes and consumer freedoms and identities. European Journal of Marketing 32, 7/8 (Aug. 1998), 664–676. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569810224065Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrea Volpini, David Riccitelli, and Gennaro Cuofano. 2017. Is Semantic Markup Really Helping Websites Improve their Online Visibility?. In Proceedings of the Posters and Demos Track of the 13th International Conference on Semantic Systems - SEMANTiCS2017 co-located with the 13th International Conference on Semantic Systems (SEMANTiCS 2017), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 11-14, 2017(CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2044), Javier D. Fernández and Sebastian Hellmann (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org, Aachen, Germany. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2044/paper13/Google Scholar
- David Wood, Marsha Zaidman, Luke Ruth, and Michael Hausenblas. 2014. Linked data: structured data on the Web. Manning, Shelter Island, NY. OCLC: ocn828182162.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Semantic Web Mining
Semantic Web Mining aims at combining the two fast-developing research areas Semantic Web and Web Mining. This survey analyzes the convergence of trends from both areas: More and more researchers are working on improving the results of Web Mining by ...
The W3C's Semantic Web Activity: An Update
Eric discusses the W3C's Semantic Web Activity's progress, including approving approval of two key Semantic Web technologies: the revised RDF and OWL. The group also chartered two new working groups: the Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment ...
Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services: Father and Son or Indivisible Twins?
The Semantic Web is, without a doubt, gaining momentum in both industry and academia. Unfortunately, Semantic Web services -- annotating computational functionality rather than data -- are underrepresented. Most Semantic Web researchers dedicate their ...
Comments