skip to main content
10.1145/3443279.3443293acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnlpirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Categorical Perception of Mandarin Tones Based on Acoustic Features by Japanese Learners

Published:01 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Based on acoustic features of four Mandarin tones, this study investigated the perceptual pattern between Tone1 (T1) and Tone4 (T4), Tone2 (T2) and Tone3 (T3) which are considered difficult for Japanese learners and Chinese native speakers to distinguish. We compared the performance of Mandarin and Japanese Listeners on the perception of Mandarin tones in a classical categorical perception experiment that employed identification and discrimination tasks. Experiments on T1 and T4 were designed using the fundamental frequency (fo) of endpoint as the acoustic cue, while experiments on T2 and T3 were designed using continual sound stimuli, which gradually changed from T2 to T3 varying in the timing of turning point (inflection point of the tone), Δfo (pitch difference between onset and turning point) or both acoustic dimensions. The results showed that when endpoint pitch was taken as the acoustic parameter, categorical perception was found between T1 and T4 by both Chinese native speakers and Japanese learners. And when the timing of turning point and Δfo were both taken as the acoustic parameters, both advanced Chinese learners and beginners demonstrated quasi-categorical perception of T2 and T3 whereas timing of turning point was used as a sole parameter, only a categorical perception tendency is observed.

References

  1. Liberman, A., Cooper, F., Shankweiler, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431--461. DOI=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/18994638Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Abramson, A.S. 1977. Noncategorical Perception of Tone Categories in Thai. J.Acoust.Soc.Am.61. S66. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2015837Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Francis, A.L., Ciocca, V. & Brenda, K.C.2003. On the (Non) Categorical Perception of Lexical Tones. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 1029--1044. DOI= https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194832Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Wang.W.S.-Y. 1976. Language Change. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 28, 61--72.DOI= https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25472.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hallé, P., Chang, Y.H.& Best, C.T. 2004. Identification and Discrimination of Mandarin Chinese Tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 395--421.DOI=http://phalle.free.fr/papers/H-B-Ch_JPhon-inpress.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Xu, Y. S., Gandour, J. & Francis, A. L. 2006. Effects of Language Experience and Stimulus Complexity on the Categorical Perception of Pitch Direction, J.Acoust.Soc.Am, 120, 1063--1074. DOI= 10.1121/1.2213572Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jing Shen, Diana Deutsch, & Keith Rayner. 2013. On-line perception of Mandarin Tones2 and 3: Evidence from eye movements. J.Acoust.Soc.Am. 133(5), 3016--3029. DOI= https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4795775Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Zhuang, Qiuhong. 1975. Acoustic features of standard Chinese Monosyllabic four tones. Acoustical Science and Technology of Japan, 31(6), 369--380. DOI=https://doi.org/10.20697/jasj.31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, T. 2001. The interplay of perception and phonology in Tone3 sandhi in Chinese Putonghua. In E, Hume and K.Johnson (eds.) Studies on the Interplay of Speech Perception and Phonology, Ohio State University working papers in Linguisitics, 55, 23--42. DOI=http://hdl.handle.net/1811/80880Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. So, C.K. 2005. The influence of L1 prosodic background on the learning of mandarin tones: patterns of Tonal confusion by cantonese and Japanese Native listeners. Proceedings of the 2005 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1--7. DOI=http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/36356Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, C.-Y., Tao, L., & Bond, Z.S. 2008. Identification of acoustically modified Mandarin tones by native listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 537--563. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.01.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Shen, X-N.S., & Lin, M-C. 1991. A perceptual study of Mandarin tones2 and 3. Lang. Speech, 34(2), 145--156. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002383099103400202Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Shen, X.-S., Lin, M., & Yan, J. 1993. F0 turning point as an F0 cue to tonal contrast: A case study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. J.Acoust.Soc.Am. 93, 2241--2243. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406688Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Zhang, Linjun. 2010. Categorical Perception of Chinese Tones by Japanese Students Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language. Chinese Teaching in the World, 13, 9--15. DOI=CNKI:SUN:YYJX.0.2010-03-005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Chao, Y.-R. 1948. Mandarin primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore, C.B. & Jongman.A. 1997. Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese. J.Acoust.Soc.Am. 102.1864-1876. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hong Zhu, Peng Zhang & Kei Yoshimoto. The Acquisition of Mandarin Tones by Japanese Learners. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (Nanjing, China, May 26 - 29, 2012). DOI=https://isca-speech.org/archive/tal_2012/papers/tl12_S2-02.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Best, C.T., McRoberts, G.W., & Goodell, E. 2001. Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system, J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 109, 775--794. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1332378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Categorical Perception of Mandarin Tones Based on Acoustic Features by Japanese Learners

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NLPIR '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval
      December 2020
      217 pages
      ISBN:9781450377607
      DOI:10.1145/3443279

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 February 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader