skip to main content
10.1145/3443467.3443744acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Low-altitude targets estimation based on sparse reconstruction for Unfolded Co-prime MIMO radar

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this letter, we launch a novel idea for direction of arrival (DOA) of far-field narrowband and low-altitude targets with Co-prime MIMO radar. First, we propose an Unfolded Co-prime MIMO radar structure and analyze the virtual aperture of sum coarray. Refer to the conception of sum coarray, the degrees of freedom (DOF) of proposed Unfolded Co-prime MIMO radar have a great increase and can solve the angle ambiguity problem successfully and effectively. However, the traditional DOA estimation algorithm is insufficient for the angle estimation of low altitude targets, requiring prior knowledge and sacrificing the effective aperture of the array. With the development of compressed sensing theory, DOA estimation algorithm based on compressed sensing theory came into being. The paper proposed a new algorithm for DOA estimation of low altitude targets by combining compressed sensing theory with Unfolded Co-prime MIMO radar MIMO radar. As a result, the algorithm has a good performance in parameter estimation accuracy and a smaller operation. Simulation results show the superiority of the proposed algorithm.If the user is adding any new data, they should make sure to style it as per the instructions provided in previous sections.

References

  1. Moffet, and A. "Minimum-redundancy linear arrays." IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation 16.2(1968): 172--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Pal, Piya, and P. P. Vaidyanathan. "Coprime sampling and the music algorithm." international conference on digital signal processing (2011): 289--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Zhou, Z. Shi, Y. Gu, and X. Shen, "DECOM: DOA estimation with combined MUSIC for coprime array," in Proc. Int. Conf. Wireless Commun. Signal Process., Hangzhou, China, Oct. 2013, pp. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. BouDaher, Y. Jia, F. Ahmad, and M. G. Amin, "Multi-frequency coprime arrays for high-resolution direction-of-arrival estimation," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 14, pp. 3797--3808, Jul. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Qin, Y. D. Zhang, and M. G. Amin, "Generalized coprime array configurations for direction-of-arrival estimation," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1377--1390, Mar. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Li, D. Jiang, and X. Zhang, "DOA estimation based on combined unitary ESPRIT for coprime MIMO radar," IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 96--99, Jan. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. Zhou, Y. Gu, Y. D. Zhang, Z. Shi, T. Jin, and X. Wu, "Compressive sensing-based coprime array direction-of-arrival estimation," IET Commun., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1719--1724, Aug. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Zhou, Y. Gu, S. He, and Z. Shi, "A robust and efficient algorithm for coprime array adaptive beamforming," IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 1099--1112, Feb. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Boudaher, E., Ahmad, F., Amin, M. G., & Hoorfar, A.. "Mutual coupling effect and compensation in non-uniform arrays for direction-of-arrival estimation." Digital Signal Processing 61(2017): 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Lu, S. Ren, & S. Cao, "Augmented Nested Arrays With Enhanced DOF and Reduced Mutual Coupling." IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 65.21(2017): 5549--5563.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C.-L. Liu and P. P. Vaidyanathan, "Remarks on the spatial smoothing step in coarray MUSIC," IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1438--1442, Sep. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Z. Shi, C. Zhou, Y. Gu, N. A. Goodman, and F. Qu, "Source estimation using coprime array: A sparse reconstruction perspective," IEEE Sensors J., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 755--765, Feb. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Shi, G. Hu, X. Zhang, F. Sun, and H. Zhou, "Sparsity-based twodimensional DOA estimation for coprime array: From sum-difference coarray viewpoint," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 65, no. 21, pp. 5591--5604, Nov. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Shi, G. Hu, X. Zhang, F. Sun, W. Zheng, and Y. Xiao, "Generalized co-prime MIMO radar for DOA estimation with enhanced degrees of freedom," IEEE Sensors J., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1203--1212, Feb. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. BouDaher E, Ahmad F, Amin M. G. Sparsity-based direction finding of coherent and uncorrelated targets using active nonuniform arrays [J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2015, 22(10): 1628--1632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Liu J, Zhang Y, Wang W, et al. Generalized design method for the difference co-array of the sum co-array [C]. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), 2016: 385--387Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Junpeng S, Guoping H, Xiaofei Z, et al. Symmetric Sum Coarray Based Co-Prime MIMO Configuration for Direction of Arrival Estimation[J]. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 2018, 94: 339--347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Shi J, Hu G, Zhang X, et al. Sparsity-Based DOA Estimation of Coherent and Uncorrelated Targets With Flexible MIMO Radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2019: 1--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zheng W, Zhang X, Gong P, et al. DOA Estimation for Coprime Linear Arrays: An Ambiguity-Free Method Involving Full DOFs[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhou Wei. DOA estimation for momostatic MIMO radar based on unfolded coprime array [J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications: Natural Science Edition, 2019, 39(6): 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhou Wei, Wang Qiang, Tang Jun, et al. DOD and DOA reduced-dimension estimation algorithm for unfolded coprime array bistatic MIMO radar [J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications: Natural Science Edition, 2020, 40(2): 20--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Low-altitude targets estimation based on sparse reconstruction for Unfolded Co-prime MIMO radar

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EITCE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
      November 2020
      1202 pages
      ISBN:9781450387811
      DOI:10.1145/3443467

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 February 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EITCE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate214of441submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate508of972submissions,52%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader