skip to main content
10.1145/3443467.3443770acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Influence of Bandwagon Effects on Rumor Spreading in Heterogeneous Network

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The spread of rumors in various complex network structures is discussed based on agent modeling in this paper. In addition to infection rate, cure rate and immune rate adopted in the epidemic model, we specially consider the influence of psychological bandwagon effects on rumor spreading. According to the state differences among network individuals, there are three different bandwagon effects: negative bandwagon effect, conscious bandwagon effect and positive bandwagon effect. The results show that the negative bandwagon effect will promote the spread of rumors, while the conscious bandwagon effect will restrain the rumor spreading to a certain extent in the regular network. However, the most important one is the positive bandwagon effect. When the recovered population reaches a certain proportion, the positive bandwagon effect can greatly inhibit the rumor spreading. And the inhibition effect increases with the increase of network heterogeneity. Especially in the scale-free network, the spread of rumors is completely inhibited by the positive bandwagon effect in spite of the initial state of infection.

References

  1. Layton F Rikkers, 2002. The bandwagon effect. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 6, 6, 787--794. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00054-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Gove, P.B. 1981. Webster's Third new international dictionary of the english language unabridged. Springtield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. H. Leibenstein, 1950. Bandwagon, snob, and veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, 2, 183--207. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/1882692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jeffrey H. Rohlfs. 2003. Bandwagon effects in high-technology industries. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1509.001.0001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. William Goffman and Vaun A. Newill. 1964. Generalization of epidemic theory: an application to the transmission of ideas. Nature, 204, 225--228. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1038/204225a0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jure Leskovec, Mary McGlohon, Christos Faloutsos, Natalie Glance and Matthew Hurst. 2007. Patterns of cascading behavior in large blog graphs. Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. New York: ACM Press, 7, 551--556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972771.60Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Sun-Ho Choi, Hyowon Seo and Minha Yoo. 2020. A Multi-Stage SIR model for rumor spreading. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series B, 25, 6, 2351--2372. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2020124Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Okada Y, Ikeda K, Shinoda K, etc. 2014. SIR-Extended information diffusion model of false rumor and its prevention strategy for Twitter. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 18, 4, 598--607. DOI: http://doi.org/10.20965/jaciii.2014.p0598Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. L. Zhao, J. Wang, Y. Chen, Q. Wang, J. Cheng, H. Cui. 2012. SIHR rumor spreading model in social networks. Physica A, 391, 2444--2453. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.12.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Sathe. 2008. Rumor spreading in LiveJournal, Mini-Project Report. Dynamical Networks, July 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Komi Afassinou. 2014. Analysis of the impact of education rate on the rumor spreading mechanism. Physica A, 414, 43--52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.07.041Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Daley D., Kendall D. 1964. Epidemics and rumours. Nature, 204, 1118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2041118a0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ruan Z Y. 2020. Epidemic spreading in complex networks. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 50, 010507. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1360/SSPMA-2019-0128Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Qiping Zhou, Fang Yang. 2019. Unsupervised alert mechanism for message propagation based on SIS model. Information Science, 37, 8, 51--55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13833/j.issn.1007-7634.2019.08.008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H. 1998. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393, 440--442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/30918Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Barabasi, A.L., and Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 5439, 509--512. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Influence of Bandwagon Effects on Rumor Spreading in Heterogeneous Network

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EITCE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
      November 2020
      1202 pages
      ISBN:9781450387811
      DOI:10.1145/3443467

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 February 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EITCE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate214of441submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate508of972submissions,52%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader