skip to main content
10.1145/3443467.3443820acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-resolution Dense Network for Point Cloud Completion

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The task of 3D point cloud completion is to predict a complete point cloud from the incomplete partial point cloud. Generally, the encoder is used to extract the global shape features of the input incomplete point cloud, and then the decoder infers the complete point cloud. At present, some methods have been improved by multi-resolution encoders and multi-layer decoders, and achieved obvious results. However, these methods still cannot fully express the shape features. In order to solve this problem, we propose a feature fusion mechanism based on skip connection. The features extracted from each resolution point cloud are connected with the input of corresponding decoder. Then they are weighted and fused to obtain denser features, which can be decoded into a finer point cloud. In addition, the current loss function is still not a good measure of the similarity between two point clouds, so we also proposed a multi-stage local average Hausdroff Loss to form a joint reconstruction loss function to guide the generation of missing point clouds. Experimental results prove the effectiveness of our method in point cloud completion tasks, and show that it products better performance than existing methods.

References

  1. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770--778.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, et al. 2015. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 91--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. de Vos B D, Berendsen F F, Viergever M A, et al. 2017. End-to-end unsupervised deformable image registration with a convolutional neural network. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer, Cham, 204--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. He K, Gkioxari G, Dollár P, et al. 2017. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2961--2969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin T Y, Dollár P, Girshick R, et al. 2017. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2117--2125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang X, Guo Q, Zhao X. 2020. Multiple Spaces Deep Hashing for Image Retrieval. In 2020 12th International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI). IEEE, 397--401.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, et al. 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Ieee, 248--255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Qi C R, Su H, Mo K, et al. 2017. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 652--660.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Achlioptas P, Diamanti O, Mitliagkas I, et al. 2018. Learning representations and generative models for 3d point clouds. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 40--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yuan W, Khot T, Held D, et al. 2018. Pcn: Point completion network. In 2018 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV). IEEE, 728--737.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sarmad M, Lee H J, Kim Y M. 2019. Rl-gan-net: A reinforcement learning agent controlled gan network for real-time point cloud shape completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5898--5907.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Yang Y, Feng C, Shen Y, et al. 2018. Foldingnet: Point cloud auto-encoder via deep grid deformation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 206--215.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhao Y, Birdal T, Deng H, et al. 2019. 3D point capsule networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1009--1018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sung M, Kim V G, Angst R, et al. 2015. Data-driven structural priors for shape completion. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 34(6): 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Thanh Nguyen D, Hua B S, Tran K, et al. 2016. A field model for repairing 3d shapes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5676--5684.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalogerakis E, Chaudhuri S, Koller D, et al. 2012. A probabilistic model for component-based shape synthesis. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 31(4): 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dai A, Ruizhongtai Qi C, Nießner M. 2017. Shape completion using 3d-encoder-predictor cnns and shape synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5868--5877.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Su H, Maji S, Kalogerakis E, et al. 2015. Multi-view convolutional neural networks for 3d shape recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 945--953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Stutz D, Geiger A. 2018. Learning 3d shape completion from laser scan data with weak supervision. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1955--1964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Qi C R, Yi L, Su H, et al. 2017. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. Advances in neural information processing systems. 5099--5108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Yi L, Kim V G, Ceylan D, et al. 2016. A scalable active framework for region annotation in 3d shape collections. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 35(6): 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Gadelha M, Wang R, Maji S. 2018. Multiresolution tree networks for 3d point cloud processing. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 103--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Huang Z, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. 2020. PF-Net: Point Fractal Network for 3D Point Cloud Completion. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 7662--7670.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multi-resolution Dense Network for Point Cloud Completion

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        EITCE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
        November 2020
        1202 pages
        ISBN:9781450387811
        DOI:10.1145/3443467

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 February 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        EITCE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate214of441submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate508of972submissions,52%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader