skip to main content
10.1145/3445970.3451153acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodaspyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EMPAware: Analyzing Changes in User Perceptions of Mobile Privacy on iOS with Enhanced Awareness

Published:26 April 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smartphones contain intimate details of users that are inferred from collected data or explicitly stored on the device. These details include daily travel patterns including most frequently visited locations, private photos, addresses and birthdays of their contacts, and more. Consumers have a general awareness that services they use without a financial payment are paid for in part by advertisements. Additionally, they have a general awareness that these services collect detailed information while they use the service. In iOS, applications must provide a detailed description in how they will use data that requires permission from the user. However, the provided description often only tells part of the story. Behind the scenes, consumers are unable to see how applications share information or which part of data the application utilizes. Additionally, consumers are unable to see how often applications communicate with advertisement services and if they share data gathered through permissions from the application. In this paper we created EMPAware, a system that provides users an enhanced awareness in how applications use their data. Users are able to view in real-time through a web portal how applications use their data and how they communicate with advertisement servers. Using EMPAware, we performed a study measuring the impact that an enhanced awareness has on the perception of mobile privacy with 32 participants. From this study, users became more concerned with privacy where 79% believe applications misuse data and 89% believe they have little control of their data. EMPAware demonstrates that when users have a better understanding in how applications use their data, they become more concerned with the privacy.

References

  1. 2018. Several Popular Apps Share Data With Facebook Without User Consent. https://www.ft.com/content/62f74704-0abf-11e9--9fe8-acdb36967cfcGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2018. These Academics Spent the Last Year Testing Whether Your Phone Is Secretly Listening to You. https://gizmodo.com/these-academics-spent-the-last-year-testing-whether-you-1826961188Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2019. 18,000 Android Apps Track Users by Violating Advertising ID Policies. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/18-000-android-apps-track-users-by-violating-advertising-id-policies/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2019. Americans and Privacy: Concerned, Confused and Feeling Lack of Control Over Their Personal Information. https://pewrsr.ch/38l7HeMGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2019. Permission-greedy apps delayed Android 6 upgrade so they could harvest more user data. https://zd.net/2Lp3ygEGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2019. Popular Weather App Collects Too Much User Data, Security Experts Say. https://on.wsj.com/2XgNDnfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2019. 'Privacy matters' in Apple's latest iPhone ad. https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/14/18266276/apple-iphone-ad-privacy-facetime-bugGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 2019. Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/19/opinion/location-tracking-cell-phone.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=HomepageGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 2020. Age Distribution of Undergraduate Students by Type of Institution. https://www.hamiltonproject.org/charts/age_distribution_of_undergraduate_students_by_type_of_institutionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 2020. EasyList. https://easylist.toGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hala Assal, Stephanie Hurtado, Ahsan Imran, and Sonia Chiasson. 2015. What's the Deal with Privacy Apps? A Comprehensive Exploration of User Perception and Usability(MUM '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2836041.2836044Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hala Assal, Stephanie Hurtado, Ahsan Imran, and Sonia Chiasson. 2015. What's the Deal with Privacy Apps? A Comprehensive Exploration of User Perception and Usability(MUM '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2836041.2836044Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Erika Chin, Adrienne Porter Felt, Vyas Sekar, and David Wagner. 2012. Measuring User Confidence in Smartphone Security and Privacy(SOUPS '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Article 1, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2335356.2335358Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Marian Harbach, Markus Hettig, Susanne Weber, and Matthew Smith. 2014. Using Personal Examples to Improve Risk Communication for Security and Privacy Decisions(CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA,2647--2656. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556978Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Qatrunnada Ismail, Tousif Ahmed, Kelly Caine, Apu Kapadia, and Michael K. Reiter. 2017. To Permit or Not to Permit, That is the Usability Question: Crowdsourcing Mobile Apps' Privacy Permission Settings. PoPETs 2017, 4 (2017), 119--137. https://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2017-0041Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ajay Kumar Jha, Seungmin Lee, and Woo Jin Lee. 2015. Permission-based Security in Android Application: From Policy Expert to End User(RACS). ACM, New York,NY, USA, 319--320. https://doi.org/10.1145/2811411.2811493Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. Krupp, D. Jesensky, and A. Szampias. 2017. SPEProxy: Enforcing fine grained security and privacy controls on unmodified mobile devices. In2017 IEEE 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference(UEMCON). 520--526. https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON.2017.8248985Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Michael Lutaaya. 2018. Rethinking App Permissions on iOS(CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article SRC 13, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3180284Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirsten Martin and Katie Shilton. 2016. Putting mobile application privacy in context: An empirical study of user privacy expectations for mobile devices. The Information Society 32 (05 2016), 200--216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1153012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kristopher Micinski, Daniel Votipka, Rock Stevens, Nikolaos Kofinas, Michelle L. Mazurek, and Jeffrey S. Foster. 2017. User Interactions and Permission Use on Android(CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 362--373. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025706Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Anthony Peruma, Jeffrey Palmerino, and Daniel E. Krutz. 2018. Investigating User Perception and Comprehension of Android Permission Models(MOBILESoft'18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 56--66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197231.3197246Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Asaf Shabtai, Uri Kanonov, and Yuval Elovici. 2010. Intrusion Detection for Mobile Devices Using the Knowledge-based, Temporal Abstraction Method. J. Syst. Softw. 83, 8 (Aug. 2010), 1524--1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.046Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Statista. 2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/300402/smartphone-usage-in-the-uk-by-age/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tilo Westermann and Ina Wechsung. 2015. Empowering Users to Make Informed Permission Request Choices(MobileHCI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1123--1125. https://doi.org/10.1145/2786567.2794333Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Verena M. Wottrich, Eva A. van Reijmersdal, and Edith G. Smit. 2019. App Users Unwittingly in the Spotlight: A Model of Privacy Protection in Mobile Apps. Journal of Consumer Affairs 53, 3 (2019), 1056--1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12218 arXiv: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/joca.12218Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong, Yong Ge, and Enhong Chen. 2014. Mobile App Recommendations with Security and Privacy Awareness(KDD '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 951--960. https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623705Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. EMPAware: Analyzing Changes in User Perceptions of Mobile Privacy on iOS with Enhanced Awareness

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IWSPA '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy Analytics
          April 2021
          88 pages
          ISBN:9781450383202
          DOI:10.1145/3445970

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 April 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate18of58submissions,31%

          Upcoming Conference

          CODASPY '24
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader