research-article

Toward a Complete Data Valuation Process. Challenges of Personal Data

Authors:

Ludovico BorattoAuthors Info & Claims

Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), Volume 13, Issue 4

Article No.: 20, Pages 1 - 7

https://doi.org/10.1145/3447269

Published: 12 August 2021 Publication History

First page of PDF

References

[1]

Nicola Askham, Denise Cook, Martin Doyle, Helen Fereday, Mike Gibson, Ulrich Landbeck, Rob Lee, Chris Maynard, Gary Palmer, and Julian Schwarzenbach. 2013. The Six Primary Dimensions for Data Quality Assessment - Defining Data Quality Dimensions. Technical Report. DAMA UK.

[2]

Alexandros Bampoulidis, Ioannis Markopoulos, and Mihai Lupu. 2019. PrioPrivacy: A local recoding k-anonymity tool for prioritised quasi-identifiers. In 2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI’19) - Companion Volume. ACM, 314–317. https://doi.org/10.1145/3358695.3360918

Digital Library

[3]

Carlo Batini, Cinzia Cappiello, Chiara Francalanci, and Andrea Maurino. 2009. Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. Computing Surveys 41, 3 (July 2009), 16:1–16:52.

Digital Library

[4]

Behshid Behkamal, Mohsen Kahani, Ebrahim Bagheri, and Zoran Jeremic. 2014. A metrics-driven approach for quality assessment of linked open data. Journal of Theoretical and Applied E-commerce Research 9, 2 (2014), 11–27.

Digital Library

[5]

Antoon Bronselaer, Robin De Mol, and Guy De Tre. 2018. A measure-theoretic foundation for data quality. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 26, 2 (2018), 627–639.

[6]

Li Cai and Yangyong Zhu. 2015. The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Science Journal 14, 2 (2015), 1–10.

[7]

Jamie Davies. 2016. Consumers price their data at – Companies pay 45p. Retrieved July 20, 2020 from, https://telecoms.com/474623/consumers-price-their-data-at-2k-companies-pay-45p/.

[8]

European Parliament and Council. 2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council - of 27 April 2016 - on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).

[9]

Adir Even and Ganesan Shankaranarayanan. 2006. Value-driven data quality assessment. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Information Quality. MIT, Cambridge, MA, 221–236.

[10]

Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumé III, and Kate Crawford. 2018. Datasheets for datasets. CoRR(2018). arXiv:1803.09010.

[11]

Sarah Holland, Ahmed Hosny, Sarah Newman, Joshua Joseph, and Kasia Chmielinski. 2020. The dataset nutrition label: A framework to drive higher data quality standards. In Data Protection and Privacy: Data Protection and Democracy, D. Hallinan, R. Leenes, S. Gutwirth, and P. De Hert (Eds.). Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1–26.

[12]

Kalapriya Kannan, Rema Ananthanarayanan, and Sameep Mehta. 2018. What is my data worth? From data properties to data value. CoRR abs/1811.04665 (Nov. 2018).

[13]

Loudhouse. 2014. The Future of Digital Trust. A European Study on the Nature of Consumer Trust and Personal Data. Industry Report 2. Orange.

[14]

Saadia Madsbjerg. 2017. It’s Time to Tax Companies for Using Our Personal Data. The New York Times (Nov. 2017).

[15]

Chloe Mawer. 2015. Valuing Data Is Hard. Retrieved July 20, 2020 from https://www.svds.com/valuing-data-is-hard/.

[16]

Leo L. Pipino, Yang W. Lee, and Richard Y. Wang. 2002. Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM 45, 4 (2002), 211–218.

Digital Library

[17]

Baba Piprani and Denise Ernst. 2008. A model for data quality assessment. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008 Workshops, Robert Meersman, Zahir Tari, and Pilar Herrero (Eds.). Vol. 5333. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 750–759.

Digital Library

[18]

Elizabeth M. Renieris and Dazza Greenwood. 2018. Do we really want to “sell” ourselves? The risks of a property law paradigm for personal data ownership.Retrieved July 20, 2020 from, https://medium.com/@hackylawyER/do-we-really-want-to-sell-ourselves-the-risks-of-a-property-law-paradigm-for-data-ownership-b217e42edffa.

[19]

Winston Ross. 2014. Is Your Smartphone Privacy Worth $100 a Month? Retrieved July 20, 2020 from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/529686/how-much-is-your-privacy-worth/.

[20]

Laura Sebastian-Coleman. 2010. Data Quality Assessment Framework. In The 4th MIT Info. Qual. Ind. Symp.

[21]

Tom Simonite. 2013. Coming Soon: Take Your Own Personal Data to Market. Retrieved July 20, 2020 from, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/517356/if-facebook-can-profit-from-your-data-why-cant-you/.

[22]

Jenna Slotin. 2018. What Do We Know About the Value of Data?Technical Report. Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data.

[23]

Brian Stack. 2017. Here’s How Much Your Personal Information Is Selling for on the Dark Web. Retrieved July 20, 2020 from, https://www.experian.com/blogs/ask-experian/heres-how-much-your-personal-information-is-selling-for-on-the-dark-web/.

[24]

Besiki Stvilia and Les Gasser. 2008. Value-based metadata quality assessment. Library & Information Science Research 30, 1 (March 2008), 67–74.

[25]

Peter van Nederpelt and Piet Daas. 2012. 49 Factors That Influence the Quality of Secondary Data Sources(Paper Quality and Risk Management). Statistics Netherlands, Heerlen/The Hague.

[26]

Shoshana Zuboff. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. Profile Books Ltd., London, UK.

Digital Library

Cited By

Alorwu Avan Berkel NVisuri ASuryanarayana SYoshihiro THosio S(2024)Monetary valuation of personal health data in the wildInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103241185:COnline publication date: 25-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103241
Watson HGallifant JLai YRadunsky AVillanueva CMartinez NGichoya JHuynh UCeli L(2023)Delivering on NIH data sharing requirements: avoiding Open Data in Appearance OnlyBMJ Health & Care Informatics10.1136/bmjhci-2023-10077130:1(e100771)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100771

Index Terms

Toward a Complete Data Valuation Process. Challenges of Personal Data
1. Applied computing
  1. Law, social and behavioral sciences
    1. Economics
2. General and reference
  1. Cross-computing tools and techniques
    1. Estimation

Recommendations

Chinese Financial Market : Stock Valuation from a Data Analysis Perspective and Option Valuation Using Truncated Binomial Trees
Protecting Data Markets from Strategic Buyers
SIGMOD '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data

The growing adoption of data analytics platforms and machine learning-based solutions for decision-makers creates a significant demand for datasets, which explains the appearance of data markets. In a well-functioning data market, sellers share data in ...
Investor Overconfidence, Firm Valuation, and Corporate Decisions

Behavioral theory predicts that investor overconfidence leads to overpricing because overconfident investors overestimate the quality of their information and underestimate risk. We test this prediction by using a measure of investor overconfidence ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Data and Information Quality

Journal of Data and Information Quality Volume 13, Issue 4

December 2021

84 pages

ISSN:1936-1955

EISSN:1936-1963

DOI:10.1145/3477245

Editor:
Tiziana Catarci
Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 August 2021

Accepted: 01 January 2021

Revised: 01 January 2021

Received: 01 February 2020

Published in JDIQ Volume 13, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Refereed

Funding Sources

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
391
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)58
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Alorwu Avan Berkel NVisuri ASuryanarayana SYoshihiro THosio S(2024)Monetary valuation of personal health data in the wildInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103241185:COnline publication date: 25-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103241
Watson HGallifant JLai YRadunsky AVillanueva CMartinez NGichoya JHuynh UCeli L(2023)Delivering on NIH data sharing requirements: avoiding Open Data in Appearance OnlyBMJ Health & Care Informatics10.1136/bmjhci-2023-10077130:1(e100771)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100771

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents