skip to main content
10.1145/3447450.3447485acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Image Super Resolution Reconstructed By Coupling Dictionary And Clustered Image Blocks

Published:09 April 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on the reconstruction of high resolution image blocks through low resolution image blocks, the reconstruction process takes advantage of the sharpness value of image has the property of scale invariance [1]. The image blocks with the same sharpness value are grouped into one class. For classes that are higher than a certain sharpness value will train coupling dictionary, then the sparse representation coefficient of the block is obtained by using the mapping function, Coupling dictionary and image feature blocks. Image super-resolution reconstruction will utilize coupling dictionary, mapping function and sparse representation coefficient. The class of have no training coupling dictionary, the corresponding block is reconstructed directly by using the same location of MR (middle resolution) image, MR image is obtained by the double cubic interpolation amplification of LR (lower resolution) image. The proposed algorithm is improved on the basis of [2]. With the image reconstruction performance basically unchanged, the time of image reconstruction is greatly reduced and the complexity of the algorithm is reduced.

References

  1. Dongwei Liu and Reinhard Klette. 2015. Sharpness and contrast measures on videos. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand. IEEE, Auckland, New Zealand, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ivcnz.2015.7761556Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Awais Ahmed and Junaid Ahmed. 2019.Clustering Oriented Scale Invariant Dictionaries for Single Image Super-Resolution. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies. IEEE, Boston, USA, 1-6. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ICOMET.2019.8673396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. L. Harris. 1964. Diffraction and resolving power. Journal of the optical society of America, Vol:54, Issue:7(1964),931-936. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.54.000931Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Goodman, J. W. 2005. Introduction to Fourier optics. Roberts and Company Publishers. Greenwood Village, CO, United States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jianchao Yang and John Wright. 2010. Image super-resolution via sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Volume: 19, Issue: 11 (Nov. 2010), 2861–2873. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2010.2050625Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Emamnuel J. Candès. 2006. Compressive sensing. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. EMS, Madrid, Spain, 1433–1452. https://doi.org/10.4171/022-3/69Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Boaz Ophir and Michael Lustig. 2011. Multiscale dictionary learning using wavelets. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, Volume: 5, Issue: 5 (Sept. 2011), 1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2011.2155032Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K Zhang, X Gao, D Tao and X Li. 2012. Multi-scale dictionary for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, Providence, RI, USA, 1114–1121. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247791Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Weisheng Dong and Lei Zhang. 2011. Image deblurring and super-resolution by adaptive sparse domain selection and adaptive regularization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Volume: 20, Issue: 7 (July. 2011), 1838–1857. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2011.2108306Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jianzhou Feng and Li Song. 2011. Learning dictionaries via subspace segmentation for sparse representation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE, Brussels, Belgium, 1245–1248. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2011.6115658Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Guoshen Yu, Guillermo Sapiro and Stéphane Mallat. 2010. Image modelling and enhancement via structured sparse model selection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE, Hong Kong, China, 1641–1644. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2010.5653853Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shuyuan Yang and Min Wang. 2012. Single image super-resolution reconstruction via learned geometric dictionaries and clustered sparse coding. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Volume: 21, Issue: 9 (Sept. 2012), 4016–4028. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2012.2201491Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fahime Farhadifard and Elham Abar. 2014. Single image super-resolution based on sparse representation via directionally structured dictionaries. In Proceedings of the Signal Processing Communication Applications Conference. IEEE, Trabzon, Turkey,1718–1721. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2014.6830580Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Michael Elad and Michal Aharon. 2006. Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Volume: 15, Issue: 12 (Dec. 2006), 3736–3745. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2006.881969Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jianchao Yang, Zhaowen Wang and Zhe Lin. 2012. Coupled dictionary training for image super-resolution. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Volume: 21, Issue: 8 (Aug. 2012), 3467–3478. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2012.2192127Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jian Xu, Chun Qi and Zhiguo Chang. 2014. Coupled K-SVD dictionary training for super-resolution. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE, Paris, France, 3910–3914. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2014.7025794Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jayant Kumar, Francine Chen and David Doermann. 2012. Sharpness estimation for document and scene images. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Patter Recognition, IEEE, Tsukuba, Japan, 3292–3295. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6460868Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jian Sun, Jian Sun and Zongben Xu. 2011. Gradient profile prior and its applications in image super-resolution and enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Volume: 20, Issue: 6(June. 2011) ,1529–1542. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2010.2095871Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. F Yeganli, M Nazzal and H Ozkaramanli. 2015. Image super-resolution via sparse representation over multiple learned dictionaries based on edge sharpness and gradient phase angle. Signal, Image and Video Processing volume 9(2015) ,285–293. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11760-015-0816-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Junaid Ahmed and Madad Ali Shah . 2016. Single image super-resolution by directionality structured coupled dictionary learning. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, Article number: 36 (2016). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13640-016-0141-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Shenlong Wang, Lei Zhang and Yan Liang. 2012. Semi-coupled dictionary learning with applications to image super-resolution and photo-sketch synthesis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, Providence, RI, USA, 2216–2223. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247930Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Trevor Hastie, Iain Johnstone and Robert Tibshirani. 2004. Least angle regression. Annals of statistics, Volume 32, Number 2 (2004), 407-499. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1083178935Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Meng Yang, Lei Zhang and Jian Yang. 2010. Metaface learning for sparse representation based face recognition. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE, Hong Kong, China, 1601–1604. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2010.5652363Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Zhou Wang, A.C. Bovik and H.R. Sheikh. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Volume: 13, Issue: 4, (April. 2004), 600 – 612. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICVIP '20: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Video and Image Processing
    December 2020
    255 pages
    ISBN:9781450389075
    DOI:10.1145/3447450

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 April 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format