skip to main content
10.1145/3447527.3474849acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fostering digital literacy through a mobile demo-kit development: Co-designing didactic prototypes with older adults

Published:27 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Developing toolkits as a support of participatory design is a common approach when designing with and for older adults. The key aspect in designing digital tools is digital literacy of the participants and how to sustain it during the project but also after its end. Yet, not enough attention has been paid to how to use such toolkits to make PD projects results sustainable. To address this issue, we are developing a mobile demo-kit, a set of didactic prototypes, which aims to foster older participants’ digital literacy and hence make findings sustainable. We illustrate it on a practice-based study, during which we conducted participatory observation, a series of interviews and organized a series of participatory workshops online with older adults. Our preliminary findings contribute to discussion on making PD with and for older adults sustainable by focusing on what older adults can learn during the PD, how to support this process but also how to communicate the findings further on.

References

  1. F. Güldenpfennig, “Tailor-made Accessible Computers: An Interactive Toolkit for Iterative Co-Design,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Stockholm, Sweden, Mar. 2018, pp. 231–236, Accessed: May 20, 2021. [Online].Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Y. Rogers, J. Paay, M. Brereton, K. L. Vaisutis, G. Marsden, and F. Vetere, “Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Apr. 2014, pp. 3913–3922, Accessed: Feb. 22, 2021. [Online].Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Berger, A. H. Ambe, A. Soro, D. De Roeck, and M. Brereton, “The Stories People Tell About The Home Through IoT Toolkits,” in Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, Jun. 2019, pp. 7–19, Accessed: May 16, 2021. [Online].Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Jelen, A. Freeman, M. Narayanan, K. M. Sanders, J. Clawson, and K. A. Siek, “Craftec: Engaging Older Adults in Making through a Craft-Based Toolkit System,” in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Tempe, Arizona, USA, Mar. 2019, pp. 577–587, Accessed: Apr. 28, 2020. [Online].Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Scheepmaker, K. Kender, C. Frauenberger, and G. Fitzpatrick, “Leaving the Field: Designing a Socio-Material Toolkit for Teachers to Continue to Design Technology with Children,” in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan, May 2021, pp. 1–14, Accessed: May 10, 2021. [Online].Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Findsen and M. Formosa, Lifelong Learning in Later Life A Handbook on Older Adult Learning. Sense Publishers, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Sackmann and O. Winkler, “Technology generations revisited: The internet generation,” Gerontechnology, vol. 11, no. 4, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.4017/gt.2013.11.4.002.00.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Gregor, A. F. Newell, and M. Zajicek, “Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people,” in Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies, Edinburgh, Scotland, Jul. 2002, pp. 151–156, Accessed: May 20, 2021. [Online].Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Meurer, C. Müller, C. Simone, I. Wagner, and V. Wulf, “Designing for Sustainability: Key Issues of ICT Projects for Ageing at Home,” Comput. Support. Coop. Work, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 495–537, Dec. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Hill, L. R. Betts, and S. E. Gardner, “Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 48, pp. 415–423, Jul. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Hawthorn, “Interface design and engagement with older people,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 333–341, Jul. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Cerna and C. Müller, “Making online participatory design work: Understanding the digital ecologies of older adults,” 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, Eds., Routledge International Handbookof Participatory Design. Routledge, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. Cerna, J. Lundin, A. S. Islind, and G. Steineck, “Supporting appropriation of self-monitoring tools in clinical settings: the case of pain in cancer rehabilitation,” 2019, doi: 10.18420/ecscw2019_p01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. G. Joshi and T. Bratteteig, “Designing for Prolonged Mastery. On involving old people in Participatory Design,” Scandinavian J. Inf. Systems, 2016, Accessed: Oct. 11, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5dd476c28cc8e2e06ed870d3d400c9e94bc23b0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Redstrom, Making Design Theory. MIT Press, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. Cerna , “Nurses’ work practices in design: managing the complexity of pain,” J. Workplace Learn., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 135–146, Jan. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. D. J. Blomberg and H. Karasti, “Ethnography: Positioning ethnography within participatory design,” in Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Routledge, 2012, pp. 106–136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Reuter, J. Liddle, and T. Scharf, “Digitalising the Age-Friendly City: Insights from Participatory Action Research,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 21, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MobileHCI '21: Adjunct Publication of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction
    September 2021
    150 pages
    ISBN:9781450383295
    DOI:10.1145/3447527

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 September 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format