skip to main content
10.1145/3447568.3448548acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Finding the best between the column store and row store Databases

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Row store databases are unavoidable to manage data in Information Systems. However, Web growth and consumer high-connectivity generate incredible amount of data and change ways to manage it. In a matter of fact, traditional Row Stores hardly satisfy new application needs they are faced with, especially for OLAP data processing and BI. Column Stores became to be an answer to this problematic but in a restricted area of features.

In this perspective, we propose a deep study that compares column stores and row stores databases to get an answer of the real impact of the physical design of column stores and row stores on the queries response, on small or big volume of data by using the TPCH benchmark in a unique centralized environment.

References

  1. Plattner, H. The Impact of Columnar In-memory Databases on Enterprise Systems: Implications of Eliminating Transaction-maintained Aggregates. Proc. VLDB Endow., 7, 13 (2014), 1722--1729. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Abadi, D. J., Madden, S. and Hachem, N. Column-stores vs. row-stores: how different are they really?, City, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaudhuri, S. and Dayal, U. An Overview of Data Warehousing and OLAP Technology. SIGMOD Rec., 26, 1 (1997), 65--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Abadi, D., Boncz, P. A., Harizopoulos, S., Idreos, S. and Madden, S. The Design and Implementation of Modern Column-Oriented Database Systems. Foundations and Trends in Databases, 5, 3 (2013), 197--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Abadi, D. J., Myers, D. S., DeWitt, D. J. and Madden, S. Materialization Strategies in a Column-Oriented DBMS. City, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Abadi, D., Madden, S. and Ferreira, M. Integrating Compression and Execution in Column-oriented Database Systems. ACM, City, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Iyer, B. R. and Wilhite, D. Data Compression Support in Databases. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., City, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lemke, C., Sattler, K.-U., Faerber, F. and Zeier, A. Speeding Up Queries in Column Stores. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, City, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Idreos, S., Kersten, M. L. and Manegold, S. Database Cracking. City, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Vermeij, M., Quak, W., Kersten, M. and Nes, N. Monetdb, a novel spatial columnstore dbms. City, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stonebraker, M., Abadi, D. J., Batkin, A., Chen, X., Cherniack, M., Ferreira, M., Lau, E., Lin, A., Madden, S., O'Neil, E., O'Neil, P., Rasin, A., Tran, N. and Zdonik, S. C-store: A Column-oriented DBMS. VLDB Endowment, City, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Valduriez, P. Join Indices. ACM Trans. Database Syst. (TODS'87), 12, 2 (1987), 218--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Chaalal, H. and Belbachir, H. An optimized vertical fragmentation approach. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE'13), 3, 4 (2013), 33--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Boissier, M., Spivak, A. and Meyer, C. Improving Tuple Reconstruction for Tiered Column Stores: A Workload-aware Ansatz Based on Table Reordering. ACM, City, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Petraki, E., Idreos, S. and Manegold, S. Holistic Indexing in Main-memory Column-stores. ACM, City, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Shrinivas, L., Bodagala, S., Varadarajan, R., Cary, A., Bharathan, V. and Bear, C. Materialization strategies in the Vertica analytic database: Lessons learned. City, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Boncz, P. A., Zukowski, M. and Nes, N. MonetDB/X100: Hyper-Pipelining Query Execution. City, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Idreos, S., Kersten, M. L. and Manegold, S. Self-organizing Tuple Reconstruction in Column-stores. City, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zukowski, M., Boncz, P. A., Nes, N. and Héman, S. MonetDB/X100 - A DBMS In The CPU Cache. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 28, 2 (2005), 17--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Finding the best between the column store and row store Databases

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICIST '20: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems and Technologies
          June 2020
          292 pages
          ISBN:9781450376556
          DOI:10.1145/3447568

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 March 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader