skip to main content
10.1145/3447932.3490525acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How Content Drives Interaction With Public Displays

Published:14 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Existing research into user engagement with public displays tends to focus on aspects of visual and interaction design, with less thought given towards how the choice of content may influence user behavior. In this article, we survey the existing literature, particularly deployment studies of public displays, for lessons learned on the ramifications of content with different properties. We find that local and timely relevance of content, as well as user-driven content creation, have been independently shown to foster user engagement, but that few other solid conclusions can be drawn from the literature. On the whole, the aspect of content tends to be underspecified and not fully reflected in studies of public displays.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

Presentation.mp4

mp4

65.4 MB

References

  1. Florian Alt, Jorg Müller, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2012. Advertising on Public Display Networks. Computer 45, 5 (2012), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Florian Alt, Stefan Schneegass, Michael Girgis, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Cognitive Effects of Interactive Public Display Applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Mountain View, California) (PerDis ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491568.2491572Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kristi Bushman and Alexandros Labrinidis. 2019. Utility-Based Scheduling for Public Displays with Live Content. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Palermo, Italy) (PerDis ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324940Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jorge C. S. Cardoso and Rui José. 2009. A Framework for Context-Aware Adaptation in Public Displays. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009 Workshops, Robert Meersman, Pilar Herrero, and Tharam Dillon (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, 118–127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sarah Clinch, Mateusz Mikusz, Ivan Elhart, Nigel Davies, and Marc Langheinrich. 2019. Scheduling Content in Pervasive Display Systems. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 4, Article 129 (Dec. 2019), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jorgos Coenen, Sandy Claes, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2017. The Concurrent Use of Touch and Mid-Air Gestures or Floor Mat Interaction on a Public Display. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Lugano, Switzerland) (PerDis ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jorgos Coenen, Eslam Nofal, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2019. How the Arrangement of Content and Location Impact the Use of Multiple Distributed Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1415–1426. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nigel Davies, Sarah Clinch, and Florian Alt. 2014. Pervasive Displays: Understanding the Future of Digital Signage. Synthesis Lectures on Mobile and Pervasive Computing 8 (04 2014), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00558ED1V01Y201312MPC011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Trien V. Do, Keith Cheverst, and Nick Taylor. 2015. Content Analysis of a Rural Community’s Interaction with Its Cultural Heritage through a Longitudinal Display Deployment. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference(Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom) (British HCI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783446.2783567Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Guiying Du, Auriol Degbelo, and Christian Kray. 2017. Public Displays for Public Participation in Urban Settings: A Survey. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Lugano, Switzerland) (PerDis ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078810.3078825Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kazjon Grace, Rainer Wasinger, Christopher Ackad, Anthony Collins, Oliver Dawson, Richard Gluga, Judy Kay, and Martin Tomitsch. 2013. Conveying Interactivity at an Interactive Public Information Display. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Mountain View, California) (PerDis ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491568.2491573Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Marc Hassenzahl. 2009. Interaktive Produkte wahrnehmen, erleben, bewerten und gestalten. In Knowledge Media Design: Theorie, Methodik, Praxis, Frank Thissen (Ed.). Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, Munich, Germany, 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486593433.147Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Elaine M. Huang, Anna Koster, and Jan Borchers. 2008. Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays?. In Pervasive Computing, Jadwiga Indulska, Donald J. Patterson, Tom Rodden, and Max Ott (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, 228–243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rui Jose, Helder Pinto, Bruno Silva, and Ana Melro. 2013. Pins and Posters: Paradigms for Content Publication on Situated Displays. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 33, 2 (March 2013), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2013.16Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mohamed Khamis, Christian Becker, Andreas Bulling, and Florian Alt. 2018. Which One is Me? Identifying Oneself on Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dieter Michielsen, Andrew Vande Moere, Jorre Vannieuwenhuyze, Olga Tsoumani, Shenja Van Der Graaf, Sandy Claes, and Chaja Libot. 2020. Hyperlocal User-Generated Video Contributions on Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 9TH ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Manchester, United Kingdom) (PerDis ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393712.3395343Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mateusz Mikusz, Sarah Clinch, and Nigel Davies. 2015. Are You Feeling Lucky? Lottery-Based Scheduling for Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Saarbruecken, Germany) (PerDis ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757721Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jörg Müller, Florian Alt, Daniel Michelis, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2010. Requirements and Design Space for Interactive Public Displays. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Firenze, Italy) (MM ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.1145/1873951.1874203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jörg Müller, Dennis Wilmsmann, Juliane Exeler, Markus Buzeck, Albrecht Schmidt, Tim Jay, and Antonio Krüger. 2009. Display Blindness: The Effect of Expectations on Attention towards Digital Signage. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Nara, Japan) (Pervasive ’09). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chitu Okoli. 2015. A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 37, Article 43(2015), 879–910. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Callum Parker, Martin Tomitsch, and Judy Kay. 2018. Does the Public Still Look at Public Displays? A Field Observation of Public Displays in the Wild. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 2, Article 73 (July 2018), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3214276Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ronald Schroeter, Marcus Foth, and Christine Satchell. 2012. People, Content, Location: Sweet Spotting Urban Screens for Situated Engagement. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317980Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Fabius Steinberger, Marcus Foth, and Florian Alt. 2014. Vote With Your Feet: Local Community Polling on Urban Screens. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Copenhagen, Denmark) (PerDis ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ströer Media Deutschland GmbH. 2016. Hochwertiger Content für Public Video. Unknown author. Retrieved June 9th, 2021 from https://www.stroeer.de/konvergenz-konzepte/konzept-content/public-video-integrationen.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin Tomitsch, Christopher Ackad, Oliver Dawson, Luke Hespanhol, and Judy Kay. 2014. Who Cares about the Content? An Analysis of Playful Behaviour at a Public Display. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Copenhagen, Denmark) (PerDis ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ISS '21: Companion Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces
    November 2021
    49 pages
    ISBN:9781450383400
    DOI:10.1145/3447932

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 November 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate147of533submissions,28%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format