skip to main content
10.1145/3448018.3458003acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Understanding Urban Devotion through the Eyes of an Observer

Published:25 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

If and how an individual’s social, economic, and cultural backgrounds affect their perception of the built environment, is a fundamental problem for architects, anthropologists, historians, and urban planners alike. Similar factors affect an individual’s religious beliefs and tendencies. Our research addresses the intersection of personal background and perception of sacred space by examining people’s responses to a virtual replica of a “madonella,” a street shrine in Rome. The shrine was virtually recreated using photogrammetry. It was optimized for user studies employing VIVE Pro Eye. The study looked at the gaze behavior of 24 participants and compared their gaze patterns with demographic background and social-communal responses. The study finds that certain religious habits of an individual could predict their fixational features, including the number and total duration of fixations, on pivotal areas of interest in the shrine environment (even though these areas were placed outside of immediate sight). These results are a promising start to our ongoing study of the perception and received meaning of sacred space.

References

  1. Virginio Cantoni, Lorenzo Merlano, Nahumi Nugrahaningsih, and Marco Porta. 2016. Eye tracking for cultural heritage: a gaze-controlled system for handless interaction with artworks. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies 2016. 307–314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sylvain Castagnos, Florian Marchal, Alexandre Bertrand, Morgane Colle, and Djalila Mahmoudi. 2019. Inferring Art Preferences from Gaze Exploration in a Museum. In Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. 425–430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Allan Charles Dawson. 2009. Shrines in Africa: history, politics, and society. (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. William Elison. 2018. The Neighborhood of Gods: The Sacred and the Visible at the Margins of Mumbai.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ralf Engbert and Reinhold Kliegl. 2003. Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision research 43, 9 (2003), 1035–1045.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dai-In Han, Timothy Jung, and Alex Gibson. 2013. Dublin AR: implementing augmented reality in tourism. In Information and communication technologies in tourism 2014. Springer, 511–523.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai-In Han, M. Claudia tom Dieck, and Timothy Jung. 2018. User experience model for augmented reality applications in urban heritage tourism. Journal of Heritage Tourism 13, 1 (jan 2018), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2016.1251931Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Tiffany C.K. Kwok, Peter Kiefer, Victor R Schinazi, Benjamin Adams, and Martin Raubal. 2019. Gaze-guided narratives: Adapting audio guide content to gaze in virtual and real environments. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. ACM, 12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300721 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Moayad Mokatren, Tsvi Kuflik, and I Shimshoni. 2016. Exploring the Potential Contribution of Mobile Eye-tracking Technology in Enhancing the Museum Visit Experience.. In AVI* CH. 23–31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alice Paladini, Abhijit Dhanda, Miquel Reina Ortiz, Adam Weigert, Eslam Nofal, A Min, M Gyi, S Su, Koen Van Balen, and Mario Santana Quintero. 2019. Impact of virtual reality experience on accessibility of cultural heritage. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42 (2019), 929–936.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pew Research Center. 2018a. Being Christian in Western Europe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pew Research Center. 2018b. The Religious Typology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mattia Rainoldi, Barbara Neuhofer, and Mario Jooss. 2018. Mobile Eyetracking of Museum Learning Experiences. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2018. Springer, 473–485.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. John F Rauthmann, Christian T Seubert, Pierre Sachse, and Marco R Furtner. 2012. Eyes as windows to the soul: Gazing behavior is related to personality. Journal of Research in Personality 46, 2 (2012), 147–156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Titus von der Malsburg. 2015. Saccades: Detection of fixations in eye-tracking data. R package version 0.1-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Helene S Wallach, Marilyn P Safir, and Roy Samana. 2010. Personality variables and presence. Virtual Reality 14, 1 (2010), 3–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ittai Weinryb. 2016. Ex Voto: Votive giving across cultures. Bard Graduate Center.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Urban Devotion through the Eyes of an Observer
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ETRA '21 Short Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
            May 2021
            232 pages
            ISBN:9781450383455
            DOI:10.1145/3448018

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 May 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

            Upcoming Conference

            ETRA '24
            The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
            June 4 - 7, 2024
            Glasgow , United Kingdom
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format