Oleksandra Poquet
ABSTRACT
Peer effects, an influence that peers can have on one’s learning and development, have been shown to affect student achievement and attitudes. A large-scale analysis of social influences in digital online interactions showed that students interact in online university forums with peers of similar performance. Mechanisms driving this observed similarity remain unclear. To shed light as to why similar peers interact online, the current study examined the role of organizing factors in the formation of similarity patterns in online university forums, using four-years of forum interaction data of a university cohort. In the study, experiments randomized the timing of student activity, relationship between student activity levels within specific courses, and relationship between student activity and performance. Analysis suggests that similarity between students interacting online is shaped by implications of the course design on individual student behaviour, less so by social processes of selection. Social selection may drive observed similarity in later years of student experience, but its role is relatively small compared to other factors. The results highlight the need to consider what social influences are enacted by the course design and technological scaffolding of learner behaviour in online interactions, towards diversifying student social influences.
- John D Bransford, Ann L Brown, Rodney R Cocking, 2000. How people learn. Vol. 11. Washington, DC: National academy press.Google Scholar
- Oskar Casquero, Ramón Ovelar, Jesús Romo, and Manuel Benito. 2015. Reviewing the differences in size, composition and structure between the personal networks of high-and low-performing students. British Journal of Educational Technology 46, 1 (2015), 16–31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bodong Chen and Tianhui Huang. 2019. It Is about Timing: Network Prestige in Asynchronous Online Discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35 (April 2019), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12355Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shane Dawson. 2010. ‘Seeing’the learning community: An exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking. British Journal of Educational Technology 41, 5 (2010), 736–752.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott Feld and Bernard Grofman. 2009. Homophily and the focused organization of ties. The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology(2009), 521–543.Google Scholar
- Josh Gardner and Christopher Brooks. 2018. Coenrollment networks and their relationship to grades in undergraduate education. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 295–304.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dragan Gašević, Amal Zouaq, and Robert Janzen. 2013. “Choose your classmates, your GPA is at stake!”. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 10 (2013), 1460–1479.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elizabeth A Hobson, Matthew J Silk, Nina H Fefferman, Daniel B Larremore, Puck Rombach, Saray Shai, and Noa Pinter-Wollman. 2020. A guide to choosing and implementing reference models for social network analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04720(2020).Google Scholar
- Caroline Hoxby. 2000. Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Carmel Kent, Amit Rechavi, and Sheizaf Rafaeli. 2019. Networked Learning Analytics: A Theoretically Informed Methodology for Analytics of Collaborative Learning. In Learning In a Networked Society. Springer, 145–175.Google Scholar
- JT Mayes. 2015. Still to learn from vicarious learning. E-Learning and Digital Media 12, 3-4 (2015), 361–371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology 27, 1 (2001), 415–444.Google Scholar
- Quan Nguyen, Oleksandra Poquet, Christopher Brooks, and Warren Li. 2020. Exploring Homophily in Demographics and Academic Performance Using Spatial-Temporal Student Networks. In Proceedings of the EDM Conference. ERIC.Google Scholar
- Fan Ouyang and Cassandra Scharber. 2017. The influences of an experienced instructor’s discussion design and facilitation on an online learning community development: A social network analysis study. The Internet and Higher Education 35 (2017), 34–47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oleksandra Poquet and Jelena Jovanovic. 2020. Intergroup and Interpersonal Forum Positioning in Shared-Thread and Post-Reply Networks. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. ACM, Frankfurt Germany, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375533Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oleksandra Poquet, Quan Nguyen, Vitomir Kovanovic, Christopher Brooks, Shane Dawson, and Alexandre Biotteau. 2020. Social architectures of University forums: Grade-based similarity in online interaction. Paper presented at the NetSciEd 2020: The Symposium on Network Science and Education, Online. https://sites.google.com/view/netscied2020/home-pageGoogle Scholar
- Oleksandra Poquet, Liubov Tupikina, and Marc Santolini. 2020. Are forum networks social networks? A methodological perspective. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. 366–375.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Isabel J Raabe, Zsófia Boda, and Christoph Stadtfeld. 2019. The social pipeline: how friend influence and peer exposure widen the stem gender gap. Sociology of Education 92, 2 (2019), 105–123.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruce Sacerdote. 2011. Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far?In Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol. 3. Elsevier, 249–277.Google Scholar
- Mohammed Saqr, Uno Fors, and Jalal Nouri. 2018. Using social network analysis to understand online Problem-Based Learning and predict performance. PloS one 13, 9 (2018), e0203590.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ivan Smirnov and Stefan Thurner. 2017. Formation of homophily in academic performance: Students change their friends rather than performance. PloS one 12, 8 (2017), e0183473.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vincent Tinto. 1975. Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of educational research 45, 1 (1975), 89–125.Google Scholar
- Hannes Weber, Marc Schwenzer, and Steffen Hillmert. 2020. Homophily in the formation and development of learning networks among university students. Network Science 8, 4 (2020), 469–491.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ian AG Wilkinson, John A Hattie, Judy M Parr, Michael AR Townsend, Irene Fung, Charlotte Ussher, Martin Thrupp, Hugh Lauder, and Tony Robinson. 2000. Influence of Peer Effects on Learning Outcomes: A Review of the Literature.(2000).Google Scholar
- Why Birds of a Feather Flock Together: Factors Triaging Students in Online Forums
Recommendations
Grade-based similarity prevails in online course forums at scale
AbstractDiscussion forums are the primary medium for supporting in-course student interactions in digital learning settings. Despite the significant uptake of discussion forums, questions remain as to how the tool can be used to initiate, ...
Highlights- This study is the first large-scale multi-site analysis of university online course forums.
How active are students in online discussion forums?
ACE '11: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference - Volume 114The role of discussion forums is an essential part of online courses in tertiary education. Activities in discussion forums help learners to share and gain knowledge from each other. In fully online courses, discussion forums are often the only medium ...
Comparison of the Impact of Two Online Learning Promotion Strategies on Group Interaction Activities
EITT '14: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference of Educational Innovation through TechnologyThis paper uses log data of teaching and learning activities in a web-based learning platform, selects two universities implementing different online learning promotion strategies as the cases, and conducts the group differences analysis based on the ...
Comments